“双一流”高校科技成果转化激励政策评价研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2475 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The effective formulation of incentive policies for sci-tech achievements transformation is crucial to promote a high-quality transformation of sci-tech achievements in universities.In order to evaluate the incentive policies of sci-tech achievements transformation in universities,this paper takes 36“double first-class”universities as examples,proposes an evaluation framework of incentive policies under sci-tech achievements transformation system based on the policy contents.The evaluation model is constructed by applying the PMC method,and cluster analysis is conducted on the sample universities based on the evaluation results.The results show that the incentive policies are generally better in terms of policy guidance and motivation,but need to be strengthened in terms of innovative incentive combination and the whole process guarantee of incentive governance.It is suggested that universities should further improve the multi-agent & diversified incentive combination mechanism,optimize the incentive implementation path,and enhance the effectiveness of“five-in-one”sci-tech achievements transformation governance,including behavioral governance,rights governance,risk governance,capacity governance and collaborative governance.

Key words： Sci-tech achievement transformation in university Incentive policy Policy evaluation PMC index model

Received: 03 August 2022

PACS:

F204

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Hao Tao
	Lin Deming
	Ding Kun
	Kang Xudong

Cite this article:

Hao Tao,Lin Deming,Ding Kun, et al. Evaluation and Research on the Incentive Policy of Sci-Tech Achievements Transformation in“Double First-Class”Universities[J]. , 2023, 4(7): 21-32.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2023/V4/I7/21

[1]ARQUÉ-CASTELLS P,CARTAXO R M,GARCÍA-QUEVEDO J,et al.Royalty sharing,effort and invention in universities:evidence from Portugal and Spain[J].Research policy,2016,45(9):1858-1872.
[2]LAM A.What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization:gold,ribbon or puzzle[J].Research policy,2011,40(10):1354-1368.
[3]VAN DE BURGWAL L H M,DIAS A,CLAASSEN E.Incentives for knowledge valorisation:a European benchmark[J].The journal of technology transfer,2019,44(1):1-20.
[4]CALDERA A,DEBANDE O.Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer:an empirical analysis[J].Research policy,2010,39(9):1160-1173.
[5]LACH S,SCHANKERMAN M.Incentives and invention in universities[J].The rand journal of economics,2008,39(2):403-433
[6]WALTER T,IHL C,MAUER R,et al.Grace,gold,or glory? Exploring incentives for invention disclosure in the university context[J].The journal of technology transfer,2018,43(6):1725-1759.
[7]OUELLETTE L L,TUTT A.How do patent incentives affect university researchers[J].International review of law and economics,2020,61:105883.
[8]郑学党,汪春雨,赵乐祥.新时代推进高校科技成果转化的财税激励政策研究[J].高校教育管理,2019,13(2):68-77.
[9]陈敬根.公办高校科技成果转化股权奖励:制度安排、现实挑战与法律对策[J].复旦教育论坛,2018,16(5):39-45.
[10]郭英远,张胜.激励兼容的高校科技成果转化收益分配模式研究[J].科学管理研究,2018,36(4):17-20.
[11]罗茜,高蓉蓉,张丽娜.高校科技成果转化效率与收益分配激励效应的三角验证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(21):27-35.
[12]刘群彦.科技成果产权激励与科研人员成果转化行为的关系研究:基于高校及科研院所的实证分析[J].中国高校科技,2020(Z1):120-124.
[13]章熙春,江海,袁传思.产权激励对促进高校科技成果转化的影响研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(17):106-111.
[14]杨红斌,马雄德.基于产权激励的高校科技成果转化实施路径[J].中国高校科技,2021(7):82-86.
[15]吴洪富,姜佳莹.高校科研人员创新创业的职务科技成果产权激励:制度创新与未来展望[J].黑龙江高教研究,2021,39(11):80-84.
[16]李巧莎,吴宇.科技成果转化的政策优化策略[J].宏观经济管理,2021(10):69-76.
[17]杨月坤,周丽娟.成果转化类创新型科技人才评价研究[J].领导科学,2019(12):67-71.
[18]姜春,陈红喜,罗利华,等.科技成果转化政策在高校的传导阻滞与反阻滞:基于在宁24所高校的扎根情报[J].情报杂志,2018,37(6):197-207.
[19]龚敏,江旭,高山行.如何分好“奶酪”?基于过程视角的高校科技成果转化收益分配机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,42(6):141-163.
[20]刘鑫,杨曦.科研人员知识产权激励的复杂政策因果机制及其整体性治理[J].中国科技论坛,2021(9):143-152.
[21]顾志恒.如何调动高校教师转化科技成果的积极性:从科技成果转化人才激励机制谈起[J].中国高校科技,2018(3):64-66.
[22]WOLLMANN H.The development of a sustainable development model framework[J].Energy policy research,2007(13):69-75.
[23]刘纪达,麦强,王健.基于扎根理论和PMC模型的军民科技政策评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(23):38-47.
[24]钟卫,陈海鹏,姚逸雪.加大科技人员激励力度能否促进科技成果转化:来自中国高校的证据[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(7):125-133.
[24]李舒羽.安徽科技成果转化激励政策实施效果评价[J].科技创业月刊,2021,34(11):81-83.
[25]陈远燕,刘斯佳,宋振瑜.促进科技成果转化财税激励政策的国际借鉴与启示[J].税务研究,2019(12):54-59.
[26]张永安,郄海拓.国务院创新政策量化评价:基于PMC指数模型[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(17):127-136.
[27]杜宝贵,王欣.全面创新改革试验政策量化评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020(5):41-50.
[28]史童,杨水利,王春嬉,等.科技成果转化政策的量化评价:基于PMC指数模型[J].科学管理研究,2020,38(4):29-33.
[29]杜丹丽,原琳,高琨.2010—2017年京津冀中小企业科技创新政策评价[J].中国科技论坛,2019(10):100-109.
[30]宋亚萍.高校一流本科教育政策内容量化评价与优化:基于PMC指数模型的分析[J].教育发展研究,2021,41(9):12-20.
[31]卜令通,许亚楠,张嘉伟,等.2015—2020年中国众创空间政策量化评价[J].中国科技论坛,2021(7):46-56.
[32]赵立祥,汤静.中国碳减排政策的量化评价[J].中国科技论坛,2018(1):116-122.
[33]刘亭立,傅秋园.绿色能源产业创新政策的量化评价与优化路径探究[J].中国科技论坛,2018(10):82-92.
[34]郝涛,丁堃,林德明,等.高校科技成果转化政策工具的选择偏好与配置研究:36所“双一流”高校政策文本分析[J].情报杂志,2021,40(12):80-86.
[35]RUIZ ESTRADA M A,YAP S F,NAGARAJ S.Beyond the ceteris paribus assumption:modeling demand and supply assuming omnia mobilis[J].International journal of economics research,2008(2):185-194.
[36]孙吉贵,刘杰,赵连宇.聚类算法研究[J].软件学报,2008(1):48-61.
[37]赵振宇.神奇的杠杆——激励理论与方法[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2001.