国家科技计划(专项)绩效评估研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (12)

Download: PDF (1108 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The performance evaluation of National Science and Technology Programs(Special Projects)usually involves the triple goals of grasping the progress and effectiveness of scientific research,pushing ahead with the management reform of Science and Technology programs,and putting forward constructive suggestions for the follow-up work.From perspectives such as task arrangement,task implementation,outcome,priority,marketization,effectiveness of management reform,new developments,and new challenges,this study aims to construct a framework of key indicators for performance evaluation,and to flesh out evaluation rules and standards underlain by multiple indicators.Through the typical performance evaluation case of“Smart Grid Technology and Equipment”key special project,this study elaborates on the application of the proposed evaluation workflow and indicator framework,outlines the“characteristic”indicators for evaluating technological advances in the electric power industry,and validates the feasibility of the proposed method with evaluation evidence available on hand.

Key words： National Science and Technology Program National Key R＆D Program Key special project Performance evaluation

Received: 15 September 2022

PACS:

F204

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Cong Lin
	Wei Linjun
	Li Yongliang
	Yan Dong
	Huo Zhu
	Gao Jan

Cite this article:

Cong Lin,Wei Linjun,Li Yongliang, et al. Research on National Science and Technology Programs (Special Project)Performance Evaluation[J]. , 2023, 4(7): 13-20.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2023/V4/I7/13

[1]国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.科技评估基本术语:GB/T 40148—2021[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021:3.
[2]宋健敏,丁元.绩效评估对政府预算决策的作用与局限:对布什政府项目评级工具(PART)的实证分析[J].中国行政管理,2010(9):108-112.
[3]赵南煜,梁冰,刘蔚.美国国家科学基金会绩效管理与评估实践研究[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2021(36):46-52.
[4]刘力,冯勇.美国国家科学基金(NSF)管理绩效评估体系及其启示[J].科技管理研究,2020(40):128-135.
[5]European Commission.Ex-post evaluation of the seventh framework programme[R].Brussels:EC,2016.
[6]European Commission.Horizon 2020 interim evaluation:maximizing the impact of EU research and innovation[R].Brussels:EC,2017.
[7]European Commission.A new horizon for europe-impact assesment of the 9th EU framework programme for research and innovation[R].Brussels:EC,2018.
[8]日本内閣総理大臣.国の研究開発評価に関する大綱的指針[R].东京:日本内阁府,2008.
[9]翟亚宁,李昂.科技计划评估理论研究回顾与展望[J].世界科技研究与发展,2020,42(6):667-676.
[10]田德录.我国政府科技计划绩效评估理论与实践[J].中国科技论坛,2010(4):37-40.
[11]蔡志刚,李海丽,翟亚宁,等.我国科技计划评估模式研究[J].科技管理研究,2017(13):47-51.
[12]张玉臣,王兆欢.公共科研项目的基本追求及绩效评价研究:基于科研项目绩效后评估实例[J].科技进步与对策,2014(31):119-123.
[13]刘华海.科研项目绩效评价模型和指标体系的构建[J].科研管理,2016(37):19-24.
[14]王忠,文宇峰,孙玉芳,等.创新质量和贡献导向下科研项目绩效评价体系研究[J].管理科学,2021(34):28-37.
[15]SHI Y,WANG D,ZHANG Z.Categorical evaluation of scientific research efficiency in Chinese universities:basic and applied research[J].Sustainability,2022(14):4402.
[16]李洪波,闫鑫,姚博文.基于集成学习的科研计划项目绩效预测研究[J].科技管理研究,2021(41):204-210.