|
|
|
| Effectiveness of Industrial Policy:Evidence from Agricultural Products Processing Enterprises |
| Zhang Guangsheng1, Hu Quanshui2, Wang Zhenhua2 |
1. Business School,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110136,China;
2. The College of Economics and Management,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The debate over the effectiveness of industrial policies lacks evidence from Chinese agricultural products processing enterprises.This paper uses the data of agricultural products processing enterprises in china industry business performance data to characterize the high-quality development of agricultural product processing enterprises with total factor productivity (TFP),and uses DID model to empirically test the effectiveness of the agricultural product processing industrial policy.The study found that the agricultural product processing industry policy has a significant effect,increasing the TFP of the experimental group by about 3.7% over the control group.The policy effect of state-owned agricultural products processing enterprises is more significant.The policy effects of agricultural products processing enterprises in the eastern,central and western regions have been strengthened successively.Industrial policies can reduce taxes and ease their financing constraints,thereby promoting the high-quality development of agricultural products processing enterprises.In terms of specific policies,the effectiveness of tax policies for agricultural products processing enterprises is greater than that of financing policies.
|
|
Received: 31 May 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]MANKIW N.G,WEINZIERL M,The optimal taxation of height:a case study of utilitarian income redistribution[R].NBER working paper No.w14976,2010.
[2]丁志国,李泊祎.农产品价格波动对政策性农业保险的影响研究:基于主体博弈模型[J].中国农村经济,2020 (6):115-125.
[3]DIAO X,ZHANG Y,CHEN K Z.The global recession and China's stimulus package:a general equilibrium assessment of country level impacts[J].China economic review,2009,23 (1):1-17.
[4]MIN O A,YP B.The treatment-effect estimation:a case study of the 2008 economic stimulus package of China-science direct[J].Journal of econometrics,2015,188 (2):545-557.
[5]郑江淮,宋建,张玉昌,等.中国经济增长新旧动能转换的进展评估[J].中国工业经济,2018 (6):24-42.
[6]杨国超,芮萌.高新技术企业税收减免政策的激励效应与迎合效应[J].经济研究,2020,55 (9):174-191.
[7]宋凌云,王贤彬.重点产业政策、资源重置与产业生产率[J].管理世界,2013 (12):63-77.
[8]余明桂,范蕊,钟慧洁.中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J].中国工业经济,2016 (12):5-22.
[9]张任之.竞争中性视角下重点产业政策实施效果研究[J].经济管理,2019,41 (12):5-21.
[10]陈强远,林思彤,张醒.中国技术创新激励政策:激励了数量还是质量[J].中国工业经济,2020 (4):79-96.
[11]邱洋冬,陶锋.高新技术企业资质认定政策的有效性评估[J].经济学动态,2021 (2):16-31.
[12]王晓珍,蒋子浩,郑颖.风电产业创新政策有效性研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37 (7):1249-1257.
[13]毕重人,赵云,季晓南.基于GRA-DID方法的海洋产业政策有效性分析[J].科学决策,2019 (5):79-94.
[14]黄锐,谢朝武,李勇泉.中国文化旅游产业政策演进及有效性分析:基于2009—2018年政策样本的实证研究[J].旅游学刊,2021,36 (1):27-40.
[15]王海,尹俊雅.地方产业政策与行业创新发展——来自新能源汽车产业政策文本的经验证据[J].财经研究,2021,47 (5):64-78.
[16]SOLOW R M.Technical change and the aggregate production function[J].Review of economics and statistics,1957,39 (3):213-320.
[17]蔡昉.中国经济增长如何转向全要素生产率驱动型[J].中国社会科学,2013 (1):56-71,206.
[18]LEVINSOHN J,PETRIN A.Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables[J].Review of economic studies,2003,70 (2):317-341.
[19]OLLEY G S,PAKES A.The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry[J].Econometrica,1996,64 (6):1263-1297
[20]鲁晓东,连玉君.中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999—2007[J].经济学 (季刊),2012,11 (2):541-558.
[21]毛其淋.人力资本推动中国加工贸易升级了吗[J].经济研究,2019,54 (1):52-67.
[22]吴利学,叶素云,傅晓霞.中国制造业生产率提升的来源:企业成长还是市场更替[J].管理世界,2016 (6):22-39.
[23]苏丹妮,盛斌,邵朝对,等.全球价值链、本地化产业集聚与企业生产率的互动效应[J].经济研究,2020,55 (3):100-115.
[24]申广军,姚洋,钟宁桦.民营企业融资难与我国劳动力市场的结构性问题[J].管理世界,2020,36 (2):41-58,211.
[25]余涤非.国有农业企业的责任:技术创新与扩散的视角[J].农业经济问题,2010,31 (5):84-89,112.
[26]JACOBSON L,LALONDE R J,SULLIVAN D G.Earnings losses of displaced workers[J].American economic review,1993,83 (4):685-709.
[27]张国建,佟孟华,李慧,等.扶贫改革试验区的经济增长效应及政策有效性评估[J].中国工业经济,2019 (8):136-154.
[28]盛丹,刘灿雷.外部监管能够改善国企经营绩效与改制成效吗[J].经济研究,2016,51 (10):97-111. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 3 
