国防科技研发人员职业使命感对创新行为的作用机制

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (1120 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the job demand-resource model and the cognitive evaluation theory of stress,a questionnaire survey was conducted among 404 national defense science and technology personnel.The results showed that there was a significant U-shaped relationship between career calling and emotional exhaustion,emotional exhaustion significantly and negatively predicted innovative behavior,and emotional exhaustion played a partial mediating role between career calling and innovative behavior.In addition,time pressure,challenge evaluation,and threat evaluation not only jointly moderated the curvilinear relationship between career calling and emotional exhaustion,but also jointly moderated the mediating effect of emotional exhaustion.Such that the curvilinear relationship between career calling and emotional exhaustion,and the mediating effect of emotional exhaustion were stronger under the conditions of high time pressure,low challenge evaluation and high time pressure,low threat evaluation.Finally,the theoretical contribution and practical implication of this study were discussed.

Key words： Career calling Innovative behavior Emotional exhaustion Stress cognitive evaluation Time pressure

Received: 30 June 2021

PACS:	E25
	F426.48
	F273.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhou Jie
	Zhang Jianwei
	Xuan Xingyu

Cite this article:

Zhou Jie,Zhang Jianwei,Xuan Xingyu. The Mechanism of Career Calling on Innovative Behavior for National Defense Science and Technology Personnel[J]. , 2022, 3(4): 58-67.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I4/58

[1]DOBROW S R,TOSTI-KHARAS J.Calling:the development of a scale measure[J].Personnel psychology,2011,64 (4):1001-1049.
[2]ZHOU J,ZHANG J W,XUAN X Y.The curvilinear relationship between career calling and work fatigue:a moderated mediating model[J].Frontiers in psychology,2020 (11):583-604.
[3]DEMEROUTI E,BAKKER A B,NACHREINER F,et al.The job demands-resources model of burnout[J].Journal of applied psychology,2001,86 (3):499-512.
[4]LEE A Y P,WANG Y H,YANG F R.Feeling exhausted? Let's play-how play in work relates to experienced burnout and innovation behaviors[J].Applied research in quality of life,2021 (16):629-648.
[5]OHLY S,FRITZ C.Work characteristics,challenge appraisal,creativity,and proactive behavior:a multi-level study[J].Journal of organizational behavior,2010,31 (4):543-565.
[6]LAZARUS R S,FOLKMAN S.Stress,appraisal,and coping[M].London:Springer Publishing Company,1984.
[7]江宇晖,尚玉钒,李瑜佳.时间压力是扼杀还是激发个体创造力？领导语言框架的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40 (7):121-135.
[8]FRONE M R,TIDWELL M C.The meaning and measurement of work fatigue:development and evaluation of the three-dimensional work fatigue inventory (3D-WFI).Journal of occupational health psychology,2015,20 (3):273-288.
[9]CREED P A,ROGERS M E,PRASKOVA A,et al.Career calling as a personal resource moderator between environmental demands and burnout in Australian junior doctors[J].Journal of career development,2014,41 (6):547-561.
[10]DUFFY R D,BOTT E M,ALLAN B A,et al.Perceiving a calling,living a calling,and job satisfaction:testing a moderated,multiple mediator model[J].Journal of counseling psychology,2012,59 (1):50-59.
[11]PENNEY L M,HUNTER E M,PERRY S J.Personality and counterproductive work behaviour:using conservation of resources theory to narrow the profile of deviant employees[J].Journal of occupational organizational psychology,2011,84 (1):58-77.
[12]刘云,石金涛.组织创新气氛与激励偏好对员工创新行为的交互效应研究[J].管理世界,2009 (10):88-101,114,188.
[13]张晓洁,刘新梅,屈晓倩.团队任务冲突如何影响个体创造力:一个跨层的中介调节模型[J].预测,2016,35 (1):22-27,61.
[14]DASGUPTA P.Effect of role ambiguity,conflict and overload in private hospitals nurses burnout and mediation through self-efficacy[J].Journal of health management,2012,14 (4):513-534.
[15]DASKIN M.Linking polychronicity to hotel frontline employees job outcomes[J].Euromed journal of business,2016,11 (2):162 180.
[16]徐云,陈相宇,张宇慧.特教教师的自我价值感对其职业倦怠的影响:教学创新意愿的中介作用[J].中国特殊教育,2019 (6):11-15.
[17]LURIA G,TORJMAN A.Resources and coping with stressful events[J].Journal of organizational behavior,2009,30 (6):685-707.
[18]张建卫,周洁,李海红,等.军工研发人员内部人身份感知对其离职意向及创新行为的作用机理:主动性人格与组织职业生涯管理的联合效应[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37 (12):108-117.
[19]LI F,CHEN T,LAI X.How does a reward for creativity program benefit or frustrate employee creative performance? The perspective of transactional model of stress and coping[J].Group & organization management,2018,43 (1):138-175.
[20]REIS D,HOPPE A,ARNDT C,et al.Time pressure with state vigour and state absorption:are they non-linearly related[J].European journal of work and organizational psychology,2017,26 (1):94-106.
[21]孙健敏,陈乐妮,尹奎.挑战性压力源与员工创新行为:领导-成员交换与辱虐管理的作用[J].心理学报,2018,50 (4):436-449.
[22]CHONG D S F,VAN EERDE W,CHAI K H,et al.A double-edged sword:the effects of challenge and hindrance time pressure on new product development teams[J].IEEE transactions on engineering management,2011,58 (1):71-86.
[23]WRZESNIEWSKI A,MCCAULEY C,ROZIN P,et al.Jobs,careers,and callings:people's relations to their work[J].Journal of research in personality,1997,31 (1):21-33.
[24]SCOTT S G,BRUCE R A.Determinants of innovative behavior:a path model of individual innovation in the work place[J].Academy of management journal,1994,37 (3):580-607.
[25]MASLACH C,JACKSONR S E.The measurement of experienced burnout[J].Journal of occupational behavior,1981,2 (2):99-113.
[26]DRACH-ZAHVY A,EREZ M.Challenge versus threat effects on the goal-performance relationship[J].Organizational behavior and human decision process,2002,88 (2):667-682.
[27]DURHAM C C,LOCKE E A,POON J M,et al.Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy,information-seeking strategy,and performance[J].Human performance,2000,13 (2):115-138.
[28]周洁,张建卫,宣星宇,等.双元视角下调节聚焦对国防研发人员创新行为的影响机制[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37 (23):124-133.
[29]ANDREWS P,MEYER R G.Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale and short form C:forensic norms[J].Journal of clinical psychology,2003,49 (4):483-492.