|
|
|
| Has the Innovation Factor Increased the Complexity of Export Technology ——Based on the Moderating Effect of Innovation-Driven Development Strategy |
| Tian Hui1, Liu Mengdie1, Cheng Qian1, Song Qing2 |
1. School of Business,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China;
2. School of Economics and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on China's inter-provincial panel data from 2007 to 2019,this paper uses global principal component analysis to extract three types of innovation factors including innovation subject,innovation input and innovation environment,and uses a fixed effects model to empirically test the impact of various innovation factors on exports technology complexity and the moderating effect of innovation-driven development strategies.The study found that innovation subject,innovation input and innovation environment can significantly increase exports technology complexity.Innovation-driven development strategies only have an enhanced moderating effect on the relationship between innovation subject,innovation input and export technology complexity.Further analysis of heterogeneity shows that in labor-intensive and capital-intensive industries,innovation-driven development strategies positively regulate the relationship between innovation input and export technology complexity.While in technology-intensive industries,innovation-driven development strategies positively regulate the relationship between innovation subject and export technology complexity.
|
|
Received: 17 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]李俊青,苗二森.不完全契约条件下的知识产权保护与企业出口技术复杂度[J].中国工业经济,2018(12):115-133.
[2]FONTAGNÉ L,GAULIER G,ZIGNAGO S.Specialization across varieties and north-south competition[J].Economic policy,2008,23(53):52-91.
[3]SAADI M.Remittance inflows and export complexity:new evidence from developing and emerging countries[J].Journal of development studies,2020(1):1-27.
[4]张艾莉,尹梦兰.技术创新、人口结构与中国制造业出口复杂度[J].软科学,2019,33(5):29-34.
[5]毛其淋,方森辉.创新驱动与中国制造业企业出口技术复杂度[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2018(2):1-24.
[6]孙天阳,成丽红.协同创新网络与企业出口绩效——基于社会网络和企业异质性的研究[J].金融研究,2020(3):96-114.
[7]刘琳,盛斌.全球价值链和出口的国内技术复杂度——基于中国制造业行业数据的实证检验[J].国际贸易问题,2017(3):3-13.
[8]郭铁成.创新驱动发展战略的基本问题[J].中国科技论坛,2016(12):5-9.[9]张伟,于良春.创新驱动发展战略下的国有企业改革路径选择研究[J].经济研究,2019,54(10):74-88.
[10]张再生,张奕野,杨庆.创新驱动发展战略实施效果评估及政策优化研究——以天津市为例[J].经济与管理研究,2019,40(3):107-116.
[11]宋林,郭玉晶.创新驱动发展战略下中国技术进步的路径选择[J].经济学家,2016(4):63-70.
[12]王谦,董玥,董艳玲.创新驱动发展战略下中国财政科技支出效率评价——基于三阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(5):23-33.
[13]邢斐,王书颖,何欢浪.从出口扩张到对外贸易“换挡”:基于贸易结构转型的贸易与研发政策选择[J].经济研究,2016,51(4):89-101.
[14]周青,陈畴镛.中国区域技术创新生态系统适宜度的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(S1):242-246+223.
[15]马宗国,丁晨辉.国家自主创新示范区创新生态系统的构建与评价——基于研究联合体视角[J].经济体制改革,2019(6):60-67.
[16]李晓娣,张小燕.区域创新生态系统对区域创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].预测,2018,37(5):22-28+55.
[17]XIE X,WANG H.How can open innovation ecosystem modes push product innovationforward? An fsQCA analysis[J].Journal of business research,2020,108:29-41.
[18]JIN M,GRANDA-MARULANDA N A,DOWN I.The impact of carbon policies on supply chain design and logistics of a major retailer[J].Journal of cleaner production,2014,85:453-461.
[19]郑烨,吴建南.内涵演绎、指标体系与创新驱动战略取向[J].改革,2017(6):56-67.
[20]李良成.政策工具维度的创新驱动发展战略政策分析框架研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(11):95-102.
[21]邵培樟.实施创新驱动发展战略的专利制度回应[J].知识产权,2014(3):85-89.
[22]周禄松,郑亚莉.出口技术复杂度升级对工资差距的影响:基于我国省级动态面板数据的系统GMM分析[J].国际贸易问题,2014(11):61-71.
[23]HAUSMANN R,HWANG J,RODRIK D.What you export matters[J].Journal of economic growth,2007,12(1):1-25.
[24]汤临佳,郑伟伟,池仁勇.智能制造创新生态系统的功能评价体系及治理机制[J].科研管理,2019,40(7):97-105.
[25]孙艳艳,苗润莲,李梅,等.京津冀创新生态系统资源整合模式、路径和机制研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020(6):112-122.
[26]陈旭,邱斌,刘修岩,等.多中心结构与全球价值链地位攀升:来自中国企业的证据[J].世界经济,2019,42(8):72-96.
[27]李平,杨慧梅.离岸服务外包与中国全要素生产率提升——基于发包与承包双重视角的分析[J].国际贸易问题,2017(9):95-106. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 2 
