税收优惠、营商环境与企业创新绩效

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (976 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the panel data of 678 companies listed on GEM during 2009—2019 and combining with the classification of China's economic regions, this paper uses an empirical test on the ways in which the tax incentives of the total sample and the sub-sample affect the innovation performance of enterprises and the regulating effect of the business environment.The results are as follows.Firstly, tax incentives have a significant positive impact on enterprise innovation performance, and R&D investment plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between the two.Secondly, doing business plays an insignificant regulating role in the direct path of tax incentives affecting innovation performance, and plays a positive and negative regulating role in the front and back half paths of the mediating effect respectively.Thirdly, the effect of tax incentives on R&D investment and innovation performance varies from region to region.The eastern region is consistent with the analysis of the total sample, while the promotion effect of tax incentives on innovation performance of enterprises in central region is not significant, while that of western region is not significant.The research results of this paper have certain reference significance for increasing the intensity of tax incentives, optimizing the doing business and further improving the innovation performance of enterprises.

Key words： Tax incentive R& D investment Innovation performance Doing business Mediating and regulating effect

Received: 21 July 2020

PACS:

F276.6

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Song Qing
	Yang Xue

Cite this article:

Song Qing,Yang Xue. Doing Business, Tax Incentives and Enterprise Innovation Performance[J]. , 2021, 2(5): 99-107.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I5/99

[1] 陈红,张玉,刘东霞.政府补助、税收优惠与企业创新绩效——不同生命周期阶段的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2019,22 (3):187-200.
[2] 梅冰菁,罗剑朝.财政补贴、研发投入与企业创新绩效——制度差异下有调节的中介效应模型检验[J].经济经纬,2020,37 (1):167-176.
[3] 尚洪涛,黄晓硕.政府补贴、研发投入与创新绩效的动态交互效应[J].科学学研究,2018,36 (3):446-455+501.
[4] 刘学元,丁雯婧,赵先德.企业创新网络中关系强度、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2016,19 (1):30-42.
[5] 赵立雨.开放式创新对企业创新绩效影响研究——内部R&D与环境波动的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35 (6):119-127.
[6] 胡海青,王钰,魏薇.网络联结、知识产权保护与创新绩效[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35 (23):1-8.
[7] 张嘉望,彭晖,李博阳.实体资产配置、研发补贴与企业研发支出[J].软科学,2019,33 (12):80-85.
[8] LIN J Y,MONGA C.Growth identification and facilitation:the role of the state in the dynamics of structural change[J].Socialscience electronic publishing,2010,29 (3):259-310.
[9] XU E,XU K.A multilevel analysis of the effect of taxation incentives on innovation performance[J].IEEE transactions on engineering management,2013,60 (1):137-147.
[10] 夏力.税收优惠能否促进技术创新:基于创业板上市公司的研究[J].中国科技论坛,2012 (12):56-61.
[11] CAPPELEN A,RAKNERUD A,RYBALKA M.The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations[J].Research policy,2012,41 (2):334-345.
[12] EDWIN M,LORNE S.How effective are Canada's direct tax incentives for R&D[J].Canadian public policy,1985 (2):241-246.
[13] 肖文,林高榜.政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J].管理世界,2014 (4):71-80.
[14] 冯海红,曲婉,李铭禄.税收优惠政策有利于企业加大研发投入吗[J].科学学研究,2015,33 (5):665-673.
[15] THAI M T T,TURKINA E.Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship[J].Journal of business venturing.2014,29 (4):490-510.
[16] 马骆茹,朱博恩.需求波动、营商环境与企业的研发行为——以长三角和珠三角为例[J].北京工业大学学报 (社会科学版),2017,17 (2):47-57.
[17] 戴小勇,成力为.财政补贴政策对企业研发投入的门槛效应[J].科研管理,2014,35 (6):68-76.
[18] BRONWYN H H.R&D tax policy during the 1980s:Success or failure[J].Tax policy and the economy,1993 (7):1-35.
[19] HALL B,REENEN J V.How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence[J].Research policy,2000,29 (45):449-469.
[20] YANG C H,HUANG C H,HOU T C T.Tax incentives and R&D activity:firm-level evidence from Taiwan[J].Research policy,2012,41 (9):1578-1588.
[21] 周克清,景姣.税收优惠政策对R&D的激励效果检验:以创业板上市公司为例[J].税务研究,2012 (6):20-24.
[22] 宋清,魏雪.融资约束、加计扣除优惠强度与研发投入实证研究——基于创业板上市公司数据[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (11):106-115+157.
[23] 王红霞,高山行.基于资源利用的企业R&D投入与创新产出关系的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26 (2):567-572+517.
[24] 李维安,李浩波,李慧聪.创新激励还是税盾——高新技术企业税收优惠研究[J].科研管理,2016,37 (11):61-70.
[25] 孙莹.税收政策对企业创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].上海市经济管理干部学院学报,2015,13 (4):46-56.
[26] 夏后学,谭清美,白俊红.营商环境、企业寻租与市场创新——来自中国企业营商环境调查的经验证据[J].经济研究,2019,54 (4):84-98.
[27] 钱炳,周勤.降低 “违约责任保证金”有利于中小卖家吗——基于信号传递理论的博弈分析[J].软科学,2012,26 (9):60-65.
[28] 栗新,王铁男,郝凡浩.投资者对R&D投入的反应:企业财务状况的信号作用[J].中国软科学,2016 (12):121-131.
[29] 何凌云,陶东杰.营商环境会影响企业研发投入吗?——基于世界银行调查数据的实证分析[J].江西财经大学学报,2018 (3):50-57.
[30] 徐浩,祝志勇,李珂.营商环境优化、同群偏向性与技术创新[J].经济评论,2019 (6):17-30.
[31] 韩晨,高山行,王钦.政府支持提升企业财务绩效的机理——双核创新的多重中介效应[J].软科学,2018,32 (9):34-38.
[32] 郑春美,李佩.政府补助与税收优惠对企业创新绩效的影响——基于创业板高新技术企业的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32 (16):83-87.
[33] 谢众,张杰.营商环境、企业家精神与实体企业绩效——基于上市公司数据的经验证据[J].工业技术经济,2019,38 (5):89-96.
[34] 何冰,刘钧霆.非正规部门的竞争、营商环境与企业融资约束——基于世界银行中国企业调查数据的经验研究[J].经济科学,2018 (2):115-128.
[35] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005 (2):268-274.
[36] 王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏.中国分省份市场化指数报告 (2018)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.
[37] 俞红海.终极控制权、法制环境与上市公司现金持有[J].南方经济,2012 (11):55-66.