论科研经费使用问题产生的权利配置结构因素

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6312 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract How to optimize the allocation structure of scientific and technological property rights,a deep-seated social and economic factor affecting the use of scientific research funds,to perfect the system mechanism of“do not want”to use scientific research funds illegally has become a policy focus of deepening the reform of scientific research management.Based on the public-private duality of the allocation of scientific and technological property rights,its principal-agent structure and right incentive mechanism,this paper analyzes the influence of the allocation structure of scientific and technological property rights on the use of scientific research funds.The results show that the public value-oriented right incentive system in the allocation structure of scientific and technological property right is not perfect,the incentive system of scientific research labor right is unreasonable,and the transformation costs of scientific and technological achievements are high,which are the deep economic right factors to induce the illegal use of scientific research funds.On this basis,the adjustment countermeasures of economic structure governance are put forward.

Key words： Illegal use of scientific research fund Rights allocation structure Economic structural governance

Received: 18 May 2020

PACS:

G301

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Huo Yutong
	Xu Zhili

Cite this article:

Huo Yutong,Xu Zhili. Discussion on the Allocation of Scientific and Technological Property Rights Caused by the Use of Scientific Research Funds[J]. , 2021, 2(3): 28-35.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I3/28

[1]徐治立,霍宇同.消解科技创新隐患,优化学术生态环境——科研经费违规使用问题的成因及治理[J].科技导报,2016,34(4):70-73.
[2]魏屹东.科学活动中的利益冲突及其控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[3]魏琼.美日高校职务成果转化的权利配置及启示[J].宁夏社会科学,2018(6):57-64.
[4]GUSTON D H.Between politics and science:assuring the integrity and productivity of research[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2000.
[5]付晔,孙巧萍.科研经费使用行为的关键影响因素分析[J].科学学研究,2017,35(5):729-736.
[6]徐治立.解析科学权利:科技产权理论与运作[M].北京:人民出版社,2008.
[7]GNEEZY U,RUSTICHINI A.Pay enough or don't pay at all[J].Quarterly journal of economics,2000,115(3):791-810.
[8]刘金伟,张荆,李君甫,等.北京高校教师薪酬满意度及其影响因素分析——基于北京地区18所高校教师的抽样调查[J].复旦教育论坛,2012(1):73-79.
[9]韩来平,杨丽丽,王烨.走向有机边界的常态化科研活动治理模式[J].科学管理研究,2018,36(2):12-15.
[10]卓泽林.大学知识生产范式的转向[J].教育学报,2016,12(2):9-17.
[11]李昕,卞欣悦.论我国公立大学职务科技成果权属分置制度的困境与完善[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2020,19(2):12-20.
[12]暴丽艳,李强,雷云云.深化科技体制改革背景下科研人员激励政策体系研究[J].科技和产业,2019,19(11):119-124.
[13]徐孝民.高校科研项目人力资本投入补偿的思考——基于科研经费开支范围的视角[J].中国软科学,2009(12):32-38.
[14]贺德方.对科技成果及科技成果转化若干基本概念的辨析与思考[J].中国软科学,2011(11):1-7.
[15]高振,陈红喜,陈晓歌,等.高校科技成果转化政策变动效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019(12):31.
[16]COASE R H.The problem of social cost[J].Journal of law and economics,1960(3):1-44.
[17]国务院.《国务院关于优化科研管理提升科研绩效若干措施的通知》国发〔2018〕25号[EB/OL].[2020-03-14].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/24/content_5308787.htm.
[18]李政刚.赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权的法律释义及实现路径[J].科技进步与对策,2020(1):15.
[19]吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析(二十五)——新修订的《事业单位国有资产管理暂行办法》导读[J].科技中国,2019(6):52-57.
[20]邓志红.高校职务科技成果的权利配置规则研究[J].科学学研究,2020,38(2):259-265.
[21]万丽华.高校科研经费腐败风险的防范及其内在逻辑[J].教育评论,2015(1):7-10.
[22]刘婉,严金海.我国科研经费管理存在的问题及对策[J].科技管理研究,2018(2):23-27.
[23]国有科研事业单位科研人员激励机制研究课题组.国有科研事业单位科研人员激励机制研究[J].财政科学,2018,26(2):51-59.
[24]北京市人民代表大会常务委员会.北京市促进科技成果转化条例[EB/OL].[2020-01-01].http://www.beijing.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengcefagui/201912/t20191205_868149.html.