|
|
|
| Policy Essentials and Institutional Path of Co-ownership of the Job-Based Scientific and Technological Achievements |
| Chu Daowen1, Cong Peihu2, Yu Xiaolong3 |
1. Law School of Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China;
2. Shandong Science and Technology Service Development Promotion Center,Jinan 250101,China;
3. Western Environment and Resources Legal System Construction Research Center,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The separation of the right pattern of scientific researcher and the ownership of job-based scientific and technological achievements results in the negative conflict of rights,which is one of the main institutional obstacle to promote the transformation of job-based scientific and technological achievements.The co-ownership mode proposed in the pilot implementation plan for granting the ownership or long-term use right of scientific and technological achievements of scientific researchers provides specific operation guidance and strong policy support for scientific researcher and employer to jointly exercise the ownership of scientific research achievements.In the aspect of institutional path:firstly,the statutory original acquisition of the right of co-ownership is conducive to preventing improper restriction by the employer and balancing the interests between employer and researcher.Secondly,the proportion of employer entitled to control disposal rights based on the particularity of job-based scientific and technological achievements embodies the principle of fairness,while the restrictive income distribution mechanism based on the consultation of both parties is conducive to promoting the transformation of achievements and embodies the principle of efficiency.Thirdly,the long-term use right of scientific researchers is an inevitable extension of the system of co-ownership,and the ultimate embodiment of the concept of transformation of job-based scientific and technological achievements with scientific researchers as the core.
|
|
Received: 01 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]闭明雄.科技成果市场化中的产权问题及模式选择[J].科技创新与生产力,2017(7):1-6.
[2]李石勇.财政资助科技成果政府介入权法律制度探究[J].政法论丛,2018(4):82-92.
[3]冯晓青.知识产权法中专有权与公共领域的平衡机制研究[J].政法论丛,2019(3):55-71.
[4]李政刚.赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权的法律释义及实现路径[J].科技进步与对策,2020(5):124-130.
[5]刘凤,张明瑶,康凯宁,等.高校职务科技成果混合所有制分析——基于产权理论视角[J].中国高校科技,2017(9):16-20.
[6]孙振嘉,孙放,张晓辉.中日《专利法》比较研究[J].情报科学,2012(11):1617-1620.
[7]ZHANG H,ZHANG Y,ZHANG Y T.Conversion efficiency and countermeasures of China's scientific and technological achievements[J].Journal of convergence information technology,2012,7(19):1101-1115.
[8]李政刚.科技成果转化视野下职务技术成果制度的检视及完善——以《合同法》第326条为中心[J].科技与法律,2019(6):84-94.
[9]宋淑华.论“死船”是否构成船舶优先权客体[J].中国海商法研究,2018,29(2):54-63.
[10]李政刚.职务科技成果权属改革的法律障碍及其消解[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019(2):68-75.
[11]谢地.试析高校国有科技成果转化的产权配置问题[J].电子知识产权,2018(9):51-66.
[12]马波,何迎春.科技人员强制转化闲置职务科技成果的地方立法不足及完善对策[J].中国科技论坛,2020(1):16-24+49.
[13]翟晓舟.科技成果转化“三权”的财产权利属性研究[J].江西社会科学,2019(6):171-179. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 2 
