基于三螺旋模型的国家实验室协同创新测度及启示

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5654 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the triple helix model,the collaborative innovation system of the scientific research ecology of the national laboratory is investigated,which provides effective verification and analysis cases for the practice of the triple helix model,and also provides analysis ideas and informatics foundation for the collaborative innovation model of big science projects.Three representative national laboratories of the United States and the state key laboratory clusters of biological sciences of China are selected as the research objects,this paper measure the collaborative innovation of national laboratories in the three-dimensional relationship of government-industry-scientific research institution,and take international collaboration into the quadruple helix model for further analysis.The collaborative innovation mechanism of scientific research institution-government-industry of the national laboratory is basically formed.The innovation entities interact to form a continuous innovation dynamic mechanism by their respective advantages.However,the multi-party collaborative relationship of the state key laboratory clusters of china's biological sciences is relatively loose,and industrial institutions and international institutions collaboration still needs to be further strengthened especially.

Key words： National laboratory Collaborative innovation Triple helix Measurement

Received: 09 December 2019

PACS:

G322

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	He Xiao
	Guo Lina
	Zhou Qun

Cite this article:

He Xiao,Guo Lina,Zhou Qun. Measurement and Inspiration of National Laboratory Collaborative Innovation Based on Triple Helix Model[J]. , 2020, 1(7): 52-59.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V1/I7/52

[1]国务院.国务院关于印发积极牵头组织国际大科学计划和大科学工程方案的通知[EB/OL] (2018-03-28)[2020-01-04].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-03/28/content_5278056.htm.
[2]METZGER N.Discussion of evaluation of federal laboratories[J].Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America,1997,94 (17):8923.
[3]LAWLER A.Department of energy-changes at Brookhaven Shock National Lab system[J].SCIENCE,1997,276 (5314):890.
[4]于冰,时勘.基于目标管理的国家实验室评价体系研究[J].科技管理研究,2012,32 (4):33-36.
[5]SODERSTROM J,COPENHAVER E,BROWN MA,et al.Improving technological innovation through laboratory/industry cooperative R&D[J].Review of policy research,2010,5 (1):133-144.
[6]DALPE R.International activities of public laboratories in Canada[J].Technology in society,1997,19 (2):127-143.
[7]HAGE J,JORDAN G,MOTE J,et al.Designing and facilitating collaboration in R&D:a case study[J].Journal of engineering and technology management,2008,25 (4):256-268.
[8]WYCKOFF JM.Meeting state and local government needs by transfer of federal laboratory technology[J].Journal of technology transfer,1981,5 (2):1-21.
[9]SHAMA A.Guns to butter:technology-transfer strategies in the national laboratories[J].Journal of technology transfer,1992,17 (1):18-24.
[10]STEPHEN T W,BRUCE A K.Technology transfer from government labs to entrepreneurs[J].Journal of enterprising culture,2008,10 (2):133-149.
[11]刘学之,马婧,彭洁,等.美国国家实验室成果转化路径解析与制度保障[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32 (11):20-25.
[12]庄越,叶一军.我国国家重点实验室与美国国家实验室建设及管理的比较研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003 (12):21-24.
[13]杨少飞,许为民.我国国家重点实验室与美国的国家实验室管理模式比较研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2005 (5):64-68.
[14]卞松保,柳卸林.国家实验室的模式、分类和比较——基于美国、德国和中国的创新发展实践研究[J].管理学报,2011,8 (4):567-576.
[15]周大民,练永宁.国家重点实验室同行评议的探讨[J].未来与发展,1993 (1):24-28.
[16]谢焕瑛.国家重点实验室评估体系研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2006.
[17]何莲.基于平衡记分卡的国家重点实验室绩效评估[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26 (18):152-155.
[18]王婉娟,危怀安.协同创新能力评价指标体系构建——基于国家重点实验室的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34 (3):471-480.
[19]JIN B H,ROUSSEAU R,SUN X X.Key labs and open labs in the chinese scientific research system:qualitative and quantitative evaluation indicators[J].Research evaluation,2005,14 (2):103-109.
[20]JIN B H,ROUSSEAU R,SUN X X.Key labs and open labs in the chinese scientific research system:their role in the national and international scientific arena[J].Scientometrics,2006,67 (1):3-14.
[21]AHLGREN P,YUE T,ROUSSEAU R,et al.The role of the chinese key labs in the international and national scientific arena revisited[J].Research evaluation,2017,26 (2):132-143.
[22]郑英姿,李洪云,何洁.论文产出分析在国家重点实验室评估中的应用——以三个物理类国家重点实验室论文产出分析为例[J].科学学研究,2011,29 (11):1638-1642.
[23]吴根,于敬鹏.国家重点实验室分类评价指标体系研究[J].实验技术与管理,2012,29 (9):180-183.
[24]徐志玮,罗春荣,冯春华.国家重点实验室的科研竞争力分析研究——以中山大学光电材料与技术国家重点实验室为例[J].科技管理研究,2013,33 (23):89-93.
[25]李旭彦,彭跃辉,徐扬.从SCI论文看电力领域三个国家重点实验室发展状况[J].统计与管理,2014 (12):40-43.
[26]田雅娟,杨志萍,周涛等.科研成果评价研究——国家重点实验室评价案例[J].科研管理,2016,37 (S1):264-269.
[27]ETZKOWITZ H,LEYDESDORFF L.The triple helix—university-industry-government relations:a laboratory for knowledge based economic development[J].EASST review,1995,14 (1):11-19.
[28]叶鹰,鲁特·莱兹多夫,武夷山.三螺旋模型及其量化分析方法研讨[J].中国软科学,2014(11):131-139.
[29]LEYDESDORFF L.The mutual information of university-industry-government relations:an indicator of the triple helix dynamics[J].Scientometrics,2003,58 (2):445-467.
[30]SHANNON CE.A mathematical theory of communication[J].Bell system technical journal,1948,27:379-423,623-656.
[31]ABRAMSON N.Information theory and coding[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1963.
[32]许海云,齐燕,岳增慧等.三螺旋模型在协同创新管理中的计量方法和应用研究[J].情报学报,2015,34 (3):236-246.
[33]LEYDESDORFF L,PARK HW,LENGYEL B.A routine for measuring synergy in university-industry-government relations:mutual information as a triple-helix and quadruple-helix indicator[J].Scientometrics,2014,99 (1):27-35.
[34]庄涛,吴洪.基于互信息的官产学研三螺旋国际合作测度研究[J].情报杂志,2013,32 (12):145-150,174.
[35]LEYDESDORFF L,SUN Y.National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan:university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations[J].Journal of the american society for information science and technology,2009,60 (4):778-788.