|
|
|
| Influence of the Knowledge Base and Knowledge Integration on Enterprises' Innovation Performance under Different Technology M&A Modes |
| Wu Jie1, Liu Shasha1, Sheng Yongxiang1, Wang Jiangang1, Liu Peng1, Shi Qinfen2 |
1. School of Economics and Management,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang 212003,China;
2. School of Business,Suzhou University of Science and Technology,Suzhou 215009,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Technology M&A is an important way for enterprises to achieve knowledge resource.It is of great significance to study the influence of knowledge base and knowledge integration on innovation performance under different M&A modes.Based on the analysis of the mechanism of enterprise innovation after technology M&A,this paper constructs the enterprise M&A innovation performance model,and explores the influence of knowledge base and knowledge integration on innovation performance.The result shows that:①The dimensions of knowledge base after enterprise technology M&A influence innovation performance:there is a positive relationship between knowledge depth and innovation performance,and an inverted U-shaped relationship between knowledge breadth and innovation performance.②Different M&A modes have different impacts on the knowledge base,which leads to different knowledge integration time adjustment strategies.That is,under the enhanced technology M&A mode,the knowledge depth is increased,increasing knowledge integration time within the threshold can promote innovation performance;under the complementary technology M&A mode,the knowledge breadth is increased,enterprises can reduce knowledge integration time and increase the knowledge application time to improve innovation performance;under the hybrid technology M&A mode,both knowledge breadth and knowledge depth are increased,but knowledge breadth plays a leading role in knowledge integration.Adjusting the knowledge integration time incrementally can improve innovation performance significantly.
|
|
Received: 06 September 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]赵黎明,陈妍庆.创新存量、技术互补性与跨国并购技术创新绩效[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40 (2):68-83.
[2]HUSSINGER K.On the importance of technological relatedness:SMEs versus large acquisition targets[J].Technovation,2010,30 (1):57-64.
[3]FRANKORT H T W.When does knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances increase new product development? The moderating roles of technological relatedness and product-market competition[J].Research policy,2016,45 (1):291-302.
[4]王磊,刘海邻,贺学会.私募股权投资与企业并购——基于创业板市场的证据[J].管理评论,2019,31 (1):27-38.
[5]刘洪伟,冯淳.基于知识基础观的技术并购模式与创新绩效关系实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32 (16):69-75.
[6]张弛,余鹏翼.并购类型会影响中国企业技术并购绩效吗——对横向、纵向和混合并购的比较研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34 (7):76-81.
[7]MAKRI M,HITT M A,LANE P J.Complementary technologies,knowledge relatedness,and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions[J].Strategic management journal,2010,31 (6):602-628.
[8]AHUJA G,KATILA R.Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms:A longitudinal study[J].Strategic management journal,2001,22 (3):197-220.
[9]MARSH S J,STOCK G N.Creating dynamic capability:the role of intertemporal integration,knowledge retention,and interpretation[J].Journal of product innovation management,2010,23 (5):422-436.
[10]CORALLO A,LAZOI M,SECUNDO G,et al.An interpretative model from the elasticity theory to explore knowledge integration in new product development[J].Knowledge management research & practice,2016,14 (4):478-488.
[11]FORÉS B,CAMISÓN C.Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size[J].Journal of business research,2016,69 (2):831-848.
[12]李晓红,侯铁珊.知识整合能力对自主创新绩效的影响——基于软件产业的实证研究[J].大连理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2013,34 (2):19-23.
[13]蔡莉,郭润萍.转型经济情境下新企业知识整合模型构建[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2015,55 (3):59-67+172.
[14]XU S.Balancing the two knowledge dimensions in innovation efforts:an empirical examination among pharmaceutical firms[J].Journal of product innovation management,2015,32 (4):610-621.
[15]王雪原,马维睿.知识管理对制造企业绩效的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2018,36 (12):2223-2232.
[16]黄璐,王康睿,于会珠.并购资源对技术并购创新绩效的影响[J].科研管理,2017,38 (S1):301-308.
[17]GUAN J,LIU N.Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network:A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy[J].Research policy,2016,45 (1):97-112.
[18]YANG J.Knowledge integration and innovation:securing new product advantage in high technology industry[J].Journal of high technology management research,2005,16 (1):121-135.
[19]刘开勇.企业技术并购战略与管理[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2004.
[20]王婉丽.中国上市企业技术并购模式及并购绩效的实证研究[D].北京:北京工业大学,2009.
[21]CALIPHA R,BROCK D M,Rosenfeld A,et al.Acquired,transferred and integrated knowledge:a study of M&A knowledge performance[J].Journal of strategy and management,2018,11 (3):282-305.
[22]XU Y,BERNARD A.A quantitative model on knowledge management for team cooperation[J].Knowledge-based systems,2013,45 (3):41-46.
[23]KATILA R,AHUJA G.Something old,something new:a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J].Academy of management journal,2002,45 (6):1183-1194.
[24]潘清泉,唐刘钊.技术关联调节下的企业知识基础与技术创新绩效的关系研究[J].管理学报,2015,12 (12):1788-1796.
[25]曹霞,刘国巍,付向梅,等.基于网络视角的知识整合过程机理及仿真[J].科学学研究,2012,30 (6):886-894.
[26]李浩.技术创新中的知识整合规律研究[J].科技进步与对策,2008 (4):157-160.
[27]曾德明,唐甜,王泓略.企业知识基础演变对技术创新绩效的影响[J].软科学,2017,31 (10):6-9+14.
[28]KAPLAN S,VAKILI K.The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation[J].Strategic management journal,2015,36 (10):1435-1457.
[29]TZABBAR D,AHARONSON B S,AMBURGEY T L.When does tapping external sources of knowledge result in knowledge integration[J].Research policy,2013,42 (2):481-494.
[30]楚岩枫,黄晓琼.复杂产品系统研发项目知识转移有效性评价模型及仿真分析[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30 (10):127-130.
[31]张铁男,苑婧婷,唐书林,等.基于尖点突变的知识应用过程中溢出效应研究[J].运筹与管理,2013,22 (6):204-214.
[32]刘凤朝,马荣康,姜楠.基于 “985高校”的产学研专利合作网络演化路径研究[J].中国软科学,2011 (7):178-192. |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 1 
