|
|
Performance Evaluation and Improvement Direction of Agricultural Science and Technology Parks from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization ——Taking 106 National Agricultural Science and Technology Parks as Examples |
Xie Linghong, Lyu Kaiyu, Xia Ying |
Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China |
|
|
Abstract The macro-environment,micro-foundation and functions of the development of ASTP are undergoing epoch-making changes in the new era.The existing research field,direction and index system of the evaluation of ASTP can't meet the needs of the times.From the perspective of rural revitalization to formulate a set of its performance evaluation index system is of great significance to diagnosis its problem,enhance its fit with the national strategy of the new era and boost rural revitalization.this paper tries to construct a performance evaluation index system of ASTP,including 3 first-level indicators,11 second-level indicators and 28 third-level indicators,and evaluates the performance level of 106 national ASTP by using the method of mean square error.It is found that the average comprehensive performance of China's ASTP is at a low level and varies greatly,in regions it presents the descending characteristics of the east-central-west;Most of the park performance is mainly reflected in the aspect of agricultural upgrading,and the demonstration and radiation driving function of the rural and farmers has not been fully shown.ASTP need to fundamentally improve the performance in accelerating agricultural transformation,promoting rural development and promoting farmers' progress so as to boost rural revitalization by means of human capital upgrading strategy,high-tech leading strategy and integrated development strategy.
|
Received: 12 February 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Cite this article: |
Xie Linghong,Lyu Kaiyu,Xia Ying. Performance Evaluation and Improvement Direction of Agricultural Science and Technology Parks from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization ——Taking 106 National Agricultural Science and Technology Parks as Examples[J]. , 2019, 0(9): 162-172.
|
|
|
|
URL: |
http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2019/V0/I9/162 |
[1]中国农村技术开发中心.国家农业科技园区创新能力评价报告2014[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2016. [2]科技部,农业部,水利部,国家林业局,中国科学院,中国农业银行.关于印发 《国家农业科技园区发展规划 (2018—2025年)》[Z].国科发农〔2018〕30号,2018-01-22. [3]HALEWOOD M,CHIURUGWI T,SACKVILLE HAMILTON R,et al.Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture:Opportunities and challenges emerging from the science and information technology revolution[J].New phytologist,2018(217):1407-1419. [4]蒋和平.我国农业科技园区的特点和类型分析[J].科技与经济,2004(17):38-44. [5]贾敬敦.建设 “星创天地”,服务农业供给侧结构性改革[J].中国农村科技,2017 (10):22-24. [6]杨其长.我国农业科技示范园区的功能定位、技术背景与战略对策研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2001,3 (3):14-17. [7]王树进.我国农业科技园区需要研究解决的几个问题[J].农业技术经济,2003 (1):45-48. [8]陈栋,甄双七,刘建峰,等.我国农业科技园区建设现状与发展对策[J].广东农业科学,2006 (12):116-120. [9]赵建亚,徐会中,俞文伟,等.现代农业科技园区发展面临的主要问题及其对策[J].安徽科技,2012 (3):27-29. [10]汪丽,张鸿雁,乔富强,等.农业科技园发展存在的主要问题及对策机制研究——以北京农学院大学科技园建设与发展为例[J].教育教学论坛,2015 (48):177-179. [11]吴海燕,李庆,魏玲玲,等.农业科技园区发展的环境创新研究——以江西省为例[J].农业科技管理,2014 (6):64-66. [12]钟瑛.农业高新技术企业及其可持续发展[J].中国农村观察,2001 (3):45-51. [13]褚保金,游小建.农业科技示范园区评价监测指标体系的探讨[J].农业技术经济,1999 (3):23-26. [14]杨秋林.关于建立我国农业科技园区质量与效益评价指标体系的设想[J].中国农业综合开发,2003 (2):16-19. [15]潘启龙,刘合光.现代农业科技园区竞争力评价指标体系的研究[J].地域研究与开发,2013 (32):5-11. [16]刘丽红,李瑾.我国农业科技园区创新能力评价指标及模型研究[J].江苏农业科学,2015 (43):451-453. [17]孙娟,罗广宁,肖田野.科技支撑粤东西北传统产业升级的现状、路径和对策研究[J].广东科技,2016 (25):71-73. [18]彭竞,孙承志.供给侧改革下的农业科技园区创新能力测评研究[J].财经问题研究,2017 (8):84-89. [19]夏岩磊,李丹.基于层次分析法的农业科技园创新能力评价——以安徽为例[J].皖西学院学报,2017 (33):54-60. [20]周华强,邹弈星,刘长柱,等.农业科技园区评价指标体系创新研究:功能视角[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35 (6):140-148. [21]SONG L,LI X.The smart technology application study of the leisure agriculture parks[J].International journal of smart home,2015 (9):163-168. [22]芮正云.我国农业科技园区功能定位及其效应研究——基于江苏白马国家农业科技园发展的认识与思考[J].安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014 (23):11-16. [23]蒋和平,崔凯.农业科技园带动社会主义新农村建设的原理分析[J].科技与经济,2010 (23):61-65. [24]朱学新,张玉军.农业科技园区与区域经济社会发展互动研究——以江苏省农业科技园区为例[J].农业经济问题,2013 (9):72-76. |
|
|
|