量子计算创新模式的国际比较研究——基于国家创新系统理论的分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1341 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize traditional technological systems and has sparked fierce international competition in the field.Governments,firms,and universities from various countries are participating and collaborating to varying extents in quantum computing innovation,leading to diverse innovation models.Based on the National Innovation System theory,this study applies fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA)to explore pathways leading to high innovation performance in the quantum computing domain.Our findings reveal that:①High-level university participation is a necessary condition for achieving high innovation performance;②There are four configurations that lead to high innovation performance,namely the university-led government-academia-driven path (S1),the industry-academia-led tripartite-driven path (S2),the university-centered tripartite-driven path (S3),and the cooperative tripartite-driven path (S4),all of which are characterized by high government involvement,high academic participation,and extensive industry-academia collaboration;③There is a noticeable trend from S1 to S4 towards more intensive collaboration among government,industry,and academia,indicating a possible evolutionary pathway for national innovation models.The conclusions of this study highlight key elements for the initial development of the quantum computing field and provide valuable insights for the advancement of quantum computing and other strategic emerging areas.

Key words： Quantum computing Innovation performance National innovation system Configuration fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Received: 01 April 2024

PACS:

F062.9

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Chen Lifan
	Wang Xuansheng
	Yang Qihan
	Shi Xinyue
	Miao Yajun

Cite this article:

Chen Lifan,Wang Xuansheng,Yang Qihan, et al. An International Comparative Study on Quantum Computing Innovation Patterns——A fsQCA Analysis Based on the National Innovation System Theory[J]. , 2025, 6(3): 177-188.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V6/I3/177

[1]潘建伟.量子信息科技的发展现状与展望[J].物理学报,2024,73(1):7-14.
[2]ZHONG H S,WANG H,DENG Y H,et al.Quantum computational advantage using photons[J].Science,2020,370(6523):1460-1463.
[3]潘教峰,王晓明,薛俊波,等.从战略性新兴产业到未来产业:新方向,新问题,新思路[J].中国科学院院刊,2023,38(3):407-413.
[4]PRESKILL J.Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond[J].Quantum,2018,2:79.
[5]张威.拥抱量子科技时代:量子计算的现状与前景[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2021(7):64-75.
[6]中国政府网.习近平主持中央政治局第二十四次集体学习并讲话[EB/OL].(2020-10-17)[2024-03-07].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-10/17/content_5552011.htm.
[7]JANG B,CHOUNG J Y,KANG I.Knowledge production patterns of China and the US:Quantum technology[J].Scientometrics,2022,127(10):5691-5719.
[8]FREEMAN C.Technology policy and economic performance:Lessons from Japan[M].London:Printer Publishers,1987.
[9]YAO L,LI J.Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration:A network analysis of China’s national innovation system[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2020,160:120185.
[10]周君璧,董瑜.美国量子研发布局对我国的启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2023,45(6):661-669.
[11]邹丽雪,刘艳丽.日本量子技术科技战略研究[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2022,37(5):7-13.
[12]FREEMAN C.Networks of innovators:A synthesis of research issues[J].Research Policy,1991,20(5):499-514.
[13]PASWAN J,SINGH V K,KARMAKAR M,et al.Does university-industry-government collaboration in research gets higher citation and altmetric impact? A case study from India[J].Scientometrics,2022,127(11):6063-6082.
[14]CHUNG S.Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems[J].Technovation,2002,22(8):485-491.
[15]ETZKOWITZ H,LEYDESDORFF L.The dynamics of innovation:From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations[J].Research Policy,2000,29(2):109-123.
[16]叶伟巍,梅亮,李文,等.协同创新的动态机制与激励政策:基于复杂系统理论视角[J].管理世界,2014(6):79-91.
[17]ZHANG Y,CHEN K,ZHU G,et al.Inter-organizational scientific collaborations and policy effects:An ego-network evolutionary perspective of the Chinese academy of Sciences[J].Scientometrics,2016,108:1383-1415.
[18]盛亚,冯媛媛,施宇.政府科研机构科技资源配置效率影响因素组态分析[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(8):1-9.
[19]任飏,黄昌利.提升国家重点实验室国际竞争力初探——从国际交流与合作视角[J].中国软科学,2003(12):95-99.
[20]王利政.我国战略性新兴产业发展模式分析[J].中国科技论坛,2011(1):12-15,24.
[21]余义勇,杨忠.如何有效发挥领军企业的创新链功能:基于新巴斯德象限的协同创新视角[J].南开管理评论,2020(2):6-17.
[22]王楠,杨柯巍.新形势下强化企业创新主体地位的问题及对策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024,45(1):3-11.
[23]边伟军,罗公利.基于三螺旋模型的官产学合作创新机制与模式[J].科技管理研究,2009,29(2):4.
[24]HIDALGO A,ALBORS J.University-industry technology transfer models:An empirical analysis[J].International Journal of Innovation and Learning,2011,9(2):204-223.
[25]ETZKOWITZ H.Innovation in innovation:The triple helix of university-industry-government relations[J].Social Science Information,2003,42(3):293-337.
[26]DE FUENTES C,DUTRéNIT G.Best channels of academia-industry interaction for long-term benefit[J].Research Policy,2012,41(9):1666-1682.
[27]贺德方,唐玉立,周华东.科技创新政策体系构建及实践[J].科学学研究,2019,37(1):3-10,44.
[28]AROCENA R,SUTZ J.Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities[J].Research Policy,2001,30(8):1221-1234.
[29]GODIN B,GINGRAS Y.The place of universities in the system of knowledge production[J].Research Policy,2000,29(2):273-278.
[30]RAMOS-VIELBA I,FERNáNDEZ-ESQUINAS M,ESPINOSA-DE-LOS-MONTEROS E.Measuring university-industry collaboration in a regional innovation system[J].Scientometrics,2010,84(3):649-667.
[31]倪君,李瑞,梁正.中国特色国家创新体系的时代特征与治理逻辑[J].中国科技论坛,2023(10):1-10.
[32]SANTORO M D,CHAKRABARTI A K.Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions[J].Research Policy,2002,31(7):1163-1180.
[33]KAFOUROS M,WANG C,PIPEROPOULOS P,et al.Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China:The role of region-specific institutions[J].Research Policy,2015,44(3):803-817.
[34]ROSSONI A L,DE VASCONCELLOS E P G,DE CASTILHO ROSSONI R L.Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research,development and innovation:A systematic review[J].Management Review Quarterly,2023,74(3):1-37.
[35]HUSSLER C,PICARD F,TANG M F.Taking the ivory from the tower to coat the economic world:Regional strategies to make science useful[J].Technovation,2010,30(9-10):508-518.
[36]BABA Y,SHICHIJO N,SEDITA S R.How do collaborations with universities affect firms' innovative performance? The role of“Pasteur scientists”in the advanced materials field[J].North-Holland,2009,38(5):756-764.
[37]吴玉鸣.官产学R&D合作,知识溢出与区域专利创新产出[J].科学学研究,2009,27(10):1486-1494.
[38]许和连,成丽红.制度环境,创新与异质性服务业企业TFP:基于世界银行中国服务业企业调查的经验研究[J].财贸经济,2016,37(10):15.
[39]黄振羽,丁云龙.美国大学与国家实验室关系的演化研究:从一体化到混合的治理结构变迁与启示[J].科学学研究,2015(6):9.
[40]庞青山.主要发达国家大学与政府研究机构的互动与合作[J].比较教育研究,2008(3):36-40.
[41]何小洲,何优军.官产学合作对社会资本与技术创新的中介效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(21):11-15.
[42]黄贤凤,武博,王建华.官产学研合作对区域R&D产出弹性影响的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(22):63-66.
[43]RUPIK A,UDDIN A,SINGH V K.Measuring the university-industry-government collaboration in Indian research output[J].Current Science:A Fortnightly Journal of Research,2016(10):1904-1909.
[44]庄涛,吴洪.基于专利数据的我国官产学研三螺旋测度研究——兼论政府在产学研合作中的作用[J].管理世界,2013(8):175-176.
[45]庄涛,吴洪,胡春.高技术产业产学研合作创新效率及其影响因素研究:基于三螺旋视角[J].财贸研究,2015,26(1):6.
[46]党蓓,赵蕴华,赵志耘,等.基于专利的官产学合作关系测度研究——以中韩石墨烯领域为例[J].情报杂志,2014,33(5):66-70.
[47]庄涛,吴洪.基于USPTO数据的中国官产学三螺旋关系研究[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(20):5.
[48]冯泽,陈凯华,陈光.国家创新体系研究在中国:演化与未来展望[J].科学学研究,2021,39(9):1683-1696.
[49]MALERBA F.Sectoral systems of innovation and production[J].Research Policy,2002,31:247-264.
[50]杨武,胡倩.我国智能制造装备产业专利合作网络演化分析[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(22):145-153.
[51]ROTOLO D,HICKS D,MARTIN B R.What is an emerging technology?[J].Research Policy,2015,44(10):1827-1843.
[52]王敏,方荣贵,银路.基于产业生命周期的共性技术供给模式比较研究——以半导体产业为例[J].中国软科学,2013(9):124-132,111.
[53]费钟琳,魏巍.扶持战略性新兴产业的政府政策:基于产业生命周期的考量[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(3):4.
[54]FREITAS I M B,GEUNA A,ROSSI F.Finding the right partners:Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions[J].Research Policy,2013,42(1):50-62.
[55]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017(6):13.
[56]杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度？基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020,36(9):141-155.
[57]FISS P C.Building better causal theories:A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420.
[58]周武源,张雅群,许丹海,等.全球量子计算专利态势分析[J].中国发明与专利,2021,18(7):9.
[59]敦帅,陈强,陈力,等.重大科技基础设施运行效益影响机制研究:基于“投入-产出”视角的定性比较分析[J].中国软科学,2021(4):11-21.
[60]敦帅,陈强.人力资本、经费保障与重大科研基础设施创新绩效:一项定性比较分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2023,44(12):37-50.
[61]王成军,付祥云,刘渐和.基于官产学的区域创新能力建设研究——以国家科技进步奖为例[J].中国科技论坛,2017(9):138-145,177.
[62]彭永涛,侯彦超.区域创新能力提升条件组态路径研究:基于中国内地29个省市的QCA分析[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(23):9.
[63]Nature Index.Institution tables[EB/OL].(2024-01-31)[2024-03-10].https://www.nature.com/nature-index/institution-outputs/generate/all/global/government.
[64]戴正,包国宪.QCA在中国公共管理研究中的应用:问题与改进[J].公共管理评论,2023,5(2):188-212.
[65]European Commission.Creation of the first basat quantum ordinator in European technology[EB/OL].[2024-03-10].https://barcelona.spain.representation.ec.europa.eu/estrategies-i-prioritats/next-generation-prop-teu/projectes/creacio-del-primer-ordinador-quantic-basat-en-tecnologia-europea_es.
[66]Cision.Government of Canada launches national quantum strategy to create jobs and advance quantum technologies[EB/OL].(2023-01-13)[2024-3-10].https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/government-of-canada-launches-national-quantum-strategy-to-create-jobs-and-advance-quantum-technologies-869929816.html.
[67]Information Technology & Innovation Foundation.The U.S.approach to quantum policy[R].2023.
[68]人民网.新一代量子计算云平台发布[EB/OL].(2023-06-01)[2024-03-10].http://ah.people.com.cn/n2/2023/0601/c358428-40440582.html.
[70]McKinsey & Company.The third annual quantum technology monitor[R].2024.
[71]iCV TA&k.A Comparative analysis of quantum industry financing in the U.S.and China[R].2024.