政产学研用深度融合如何系统突破关键核心技术

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (6)

Download: PDF (1898 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This study adopts the longitudinal case study to explore the path and mechanism of the deep integration of China's high-speed railway's government-industry-university-research-user to break through key core technologies.The results are as follows.On the one hand,in the three stages of technological accumulation,introduction,digestion and absorption,and independent innovation that China's high-speed railway industry has experienced,the integration system of government-industry-university-research-user has gradually deepened and matured,and key core technological innovation capabilities of the high-speed railway have experienced the evolution of imitative innovation,secondary innovation,and integration and original innovation.On the other hand,under the macro-control and top-level design,aiming to meet user needs,the government establishes the management mechanism for joint tackling of major projects,ensures the collaboration of multiple subjects,multiple elements,and multiple projects,and gives full play to the advantage of the deep integration of government-industry-university-research-user,thereby accelerating the breakthrough of key core technologies.This study expands previous research on key core technologies and deep integration of industry-university-research,and provides important inspiration for the practice of Chinese manufacturing industry to break through key core technologies.

Key words： Government-industry-university-research-user Deep integration China's high-speed railway Key core technology

Received: 26 July 2022

PACS:

G311

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Zi
	Zhang Shuman

Cite this article:

Wang Zi,Zhang Shuman. How Can the Deep Integration of Government-Industry-University- Research-User Systematically Break Through Key Core Technologies[J]. , 2023, 4(6): 75-85.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2023/V4/I6/75

[1]张杰,吴书凤.“十四五”时期中国关键核心技术创新的障碍与突破路径分析[J].人文杂志,2021(1):9-19.
[2]陈劲,杨硕.优化我国科技结构强化企业创新主体地位[J].创新科技,2022,22(6):1-11.
[3]余江,管开轩,李哲,等.聚焦关键核心技术攻关强化国家科技创新体系化能力[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35(8):1018-1023.
[4]张嘉毅,原长弘.产学研融合的组织模式特征:基于不同主体主导的典型案例研究[J].中国科技论坛,2022(5):71-80,98.
[5]宋艳,原长弘,张树满.装备制造业领军企业如何突破关键核心技术[J].科学学研究,2022,40(3):420-432.
[6]江鸿,吕铁.政企能力共演化与复杂产品系统集成能力提升:中国高速列车产业技术追赶的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2019,35(5):106-125,199.
[7]葛爽,柳卸林.我国关键核心技术组织方式与研发模式分析:基于创新生态系统的思考[J].科学学研究,2022,40(11):2093-2101.
[8]柳卸林,葛爽.中国复杂产品系统的追赶路径研究:基于创新生态系统的视角[J].科学学研究,2023,41(2):221-229.
[9]胡旭博,原长弘.关键核心技术:概念、特征与突破因素[J].科学学研究,2022,40(1):4-11.
[10]辜胜阻,吴华君,吴沁沁,等.创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石[J].中国软科学,2018(10):9-18.
[11]余江,陈凤,张越,等.铸造强国重器:关键核心技术突破的规律探索与体系构建[J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(3):339-343.
[12]陈凤,余江,甘泉,等.国立科研机构如何牵引核心技术攻坚体系:国际经验与启示[J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(8):920-925.
[13]张治河,苗欣苑.“卡脖子”关键核心技术的甄选机制研究[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,49(6):5-15.
[14]杨思莹.政府推动关键核心技术创新:理论基础与实践方案[J].经济学家,2020(9):85-94.
[15]朱瑞博,刘芸.构建新型举国体制推动产业高质量发展[J].上海经济研究,2022(3):11-19.
[16]杨武,陈培,DAVID G.光刻机产业技术扩散与技术动态演化:对“卡脖子”技术的启示[J].中国科技论坛,2022(9):73-84.
[17]吕薇.有效发挥企业在基础研究中的作用[J].中国科技论坛,2020(6):4-5.
[18]陈劲,朱子钦.关键核心技术“卡脖子”问题突破路径研究[J].创新科技,2020,20(7):1-8.
[19]李健.改革开放40年中国产学研合作回眸[J].中国科技产业,2018(10):17-19.
[20]邵进.产学研深度融合的探索与思考:基于三重螺旋模型的分析[J].中国高校科技,2015(8):7-9.
[21]张羽飞,原长弘,王涛,等.产学研深度融合演化路径分析:基于浙江清华长三角研究院的纵向案例研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020(7):87-98.
[22]张羽飞,原长弘,张树满.产学研融合程度对科技型中小企业创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(9):64-74.
[23]吕铁,贺俊.政府干预何以有效:对中国高铁技术赶超的调查研究[J].管理世界,2019,35(9):152-163,197.
[24]李阳,原长弘,王涛,等.政产学研用协同创新如何有效提升企业竞争力[J].科学学研究,2016,34(11):1744-1757.
[25]吴卫红,陈高翔,张爱美.“政产学研用资”多元主体协同创新三三螺旋模式及机理[J].中国科技论坛,2018(5):1-10.
[26]EISENHARDT K M.Building theories from case study research[J].Academy of management review,1989,14(4):532-550.
[27]张树满,原长弘.制造业领军企业如何培育关键核心技术持续创新能力[J].科研管理,2022,43(4):103-110.
[28]SIGGELKOW N.Persuasion with case studies[J].Academy of management journal,2007,50(1):20-24.
[29]EISENHARDT K M,GRAEBNER M E.Theory building from cases:opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of management journal,2007,50(1):25-32.
[30]YIN R K.Case study research:design and methods[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage publications,2014.
[31]邵剑兵,刘力钢,杨宏戟.基于企业基因遗传理论的互联网企业非市场战略选择及演变:阿里巴巴社会责任行为的案例分析[J].管理世界,2016(12):159-171.
[32]张娜娜,谢伟,臧树伟.管理学习的过程及来源:上汽集团的案例研究[J].科研管理,2019,40(4):157-167.
[33]ZHANG S,HAN C,CHEN C.Repeated partnerships in university-industry collaboration portfolios and firm innovation performance:roles of absorptive capacity and political connections[J].R&D management,2022,52(5):838-853
[34]原长弘,张树满.以企业为主体的产学研协同创新:管理框架构建[J].科研管理,2019,40(10):184-192.
[35]李清.基于SNA的项目群管理信息共享研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2015(6):8-12.
[36]DOOLEY L,LUPTON G,O'SULLIVAN D.Multiple project management:a modern competitive necessity[J].Journal of manufacturing technology management,2005,16(5):466-482.
[37]李显君,熊昱,冯堃.中国高铁产业核心技术突破路径与机制[J].科研管理,2020,41(10):1-10.
[38]贺俊,吕铁,黄阳华,等.技术赶超的激励结构与能力积累:中国高铁经验及其政策启示[J].管理世界,2018,34(10):191-207.