企业国际合作研发能否促进科技成果转化——从知识创新到产品创新

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1197 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the panel data of Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2018 and the micro database constructed by Python crawler and text mining technology,this paper empirically examines the effect and intermediate mechanism of international cooperative R&D on the transformation of enterprises' scientific and technological achievements.The results show the followings.①Firms' participation in international cooperative R&D can significantly improve the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.②Heterogeneity analysis shows that the effect of international cooperative R&D on the efficiency of transformation differs according to different cooperative modes,properties of technology and industry characteristics.③Based on the mechanism research,it is found that the improvement of innovation quality is an important intermediary channel for enterprises' international cooperative R&D to promote the efficiency of scientific and technological achievement transformation.After distinguishing the transformation efficiency of knowledge innovation and product innovation,it shows that secondary transformation effect exists from knowledge innovation to product innovation.Different from the existing literatures that focus more on the external factors affecting the transformation of scientific and technological achievements,this paper explains why international cooperative R&D boosts the transformation of scientific and technological achievements from the internal perspective of innovation quality,which has certain theoretical and application value.

Key words： International cooperative R&D Scientific and technological achievement Secondary transformation effect Innovation quality Text analysis

Received: 25 August 2021

PACS:

F062.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Deng Xiangrong
	Yang Liuqing
	Feng Xueliang

Cite this article:

Deng Xiangrong,Yang Liuqing,Feng Xueliang. Whether International Cooperative Research and Development of Enterprises Promote the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements or not:From Knowledge Innovation to Product Innovation[J]. , 2022, 3(8): 107-118.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I8/107

[1]陈红喜,关聪,王袁光曦.国内科技成果转化研究的现状和热点探析——基于共词分析和社会网络分析视角[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(7):125-134.
[2]孙龙,雷良海.基于政策量化分析的上海市财政支持科技成果转化研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(8):40-45.
[3]许可,张亚峰,肖冰.科学与市场间的边界组织:科技成果转化机构的理论拓展与实践创新[J].中国软科学,2021(6):64-73.
[4]TRAJTENBERG M,HENDERSON R,JAFFE A.University versus corporate patents:a window on the basicness of invention[J].Economics of innovation & new technology,1997,5(1):19-50.
[5]何彬,范硕.中国大学科技成果转化效率演变与影响因素——基于Bootstrap-DEA方法和面板Tobit模型的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(10):85-94.
[6]GEROSKI P A.Models of technology diffusion[J].Research policy,2000,29(4):603-625.
[7]陶娜,郭英远,张胜.基于利益相关者理论的高校科技成果转化机制研究[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(21):131-137.
[8]仲伟俊,梅姝娥,谢园园.产学研合作技术创新模式分析[J].中国软科学,2009(8):174-181.
[9]陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012,30(2):161-164.
[10]TEIXEIRA A A C,MOTA L.A bibliometric portrait of the evolution,scientific roots and influence of the literature on university-industry links[J].Scientometrics,2012,93(3):719-743.
[11]郭久荣.突破农业高校科研成果转化难的主要创新途径——农业高校科技成果转化问题探讨(二)[J].科技管理研究,2006(3):199-201.
[12]SOHN S Y,MOON T H.Decision tree based on data envelopment analysis for effective technology commercialization[J].Expert systems with applications,2004,26(2):279-284.
[13]郭建强,冯开文.农业科技成果转化基本模式比较[J].中国软科学,2010(S1):133-137.
[14]李天柱,侯锡林,马佳.基于接力创新的高校科技成果转化机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(3):147-151.
[15]刘斐然,胡立君,范小群.产学研合作对企业创新质量的影响研究[J].经济管理,2020,42(10):120-136.
[16]徐慧琳,杨望,王振山.开放式创新与企业创新——基于中国沪深A股上市公司跨国并购的经验研究[J].国际金融研究,2019(11):86-96.
[17]臧红岩,陈宝明,臧红敏.我国国际科技合作全面融入全球创新网络研究[J].广西社会科学,2019(9):62-66.
[18]HANER U E.Innovation quality——a conceptual framework[J].International journal of production economics,2002,80(1):31-37.
[19]张武军,徐宁.新常态下科技成果转化政策支撑与法律保障研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(3):109-112.
[20]孙涛,王钰,李伟.区域科技成果外流的演化博弈分析——东北地区科技成果外流的原因和对策[J].中国科技论坛,2018(5):97-106.
[21]钟卫,陈彦.政府如何促进大学科技成果转化:基于发达国家的经验总结[J].中国科技论坛,2019(8):170-178.
[22]刘家树,菅利荣.科技成果转化效率测度与影响因素分析[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(20):113-116.
[23]张健,李春龙,倪渊,等.AJ模型下的企业合作研发模式选择——基于知识影响因素的博弈[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(20):109-116.
[24]武建龙,刘家洋.新能源汽车创新生态系统演进风险及应对策略——以比亚迪新能源汽车为例[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(3):72-77.
[25]BRUNSWICKER S,VANHAVERBEKE W.Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises(smes):external knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators[J].Journal of small business management,2015,53(4):1241-1263.
[26]武立宇.研发合作关系的选择及其对创新绩效的影响研究——基于比亚迪的案例分析[D].苏州:苏州大学,2019.
[27]秦佩恒,赵兰香,万劲波.中低技术企业创新模式与创新绩效研究——基于中国制造业创新调查的实证分析[J].科研管理,2016,37(11):26-34.
[28]薛镭,杨艳,朱恒源.战略导向对中国企业产品创新绩效的影响:一个高科技行业-非高科技行业企业的比较[J].科研管理,2011,32(12):1-8.
[29]寇宗来,刘学悦.中国企业的专利行为:特征事实以及来自创新政策的影响[J].经济研究,2020,55(3):83-99.
[30]PARK Y,YOON B,LEE S.The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries:patent citation analysis[J].Technology in society,2005,27(4):471-485.
[31]PLANESSATORRA S,MORIGUCHI T.What role for social sciences in innovation:re-assessing how scientific disciplines contribute to different industries[J].OECD science,technology and industry policy papers,2017.
[32]杨嵘,于枫敏,许晶晶.两阶段视角下我国高技术产业创新效率的时空演变及影响因素——基于三阶段DEA-Tobit模型的实证研究[J/OL].资源开发与市场:1-11
[33]肖羽琛.中国区域高技术产业技术创新能力的比较研究——基于两阶段视角的实证分析[J].铜陵学院学报,2019,18(1):17-21.
[34]BENEITO P.The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models[J].research policy,2006,35(4):502-517.
[35]车玉琴.辽宁省科技成果转化机制研究[D].沈阳:沈阳理工大学,2008.
[36]赵会滨,傅毓维.关于科技成果转化机制的研究[J].科学中国人,2001(6):44-45.
[37]YAMR ,LO W,TANG E P,et al.Analysis of sources of innovation,technological innovation capabilities,and performance:an empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries[J].Research policy,2011,40(3):391-402.
[38]柴国荣,许崇美,闵宗陶.科技成果转化评价指标体系设计及应用研究[J].软科学,2010,24(2):1-5.
[39]张珺涵,罗守贵.科技成果转化效率及企业规模与技术创新——基于高技术服务企业的实证研究[J].软科学,2018,32(7):1-4.
[40]肖仁桥,王宗军,钱丽.我国不同性质企业技术创新效率及其影响因素研究:基于两阶段价值链的视角[J].管理工程学报,2015,29(2):190-201.
[41]吴崇,张诗帆,薄思怡.研发国际化模式选择能否促进企业创新[J].中国科技论坛,2020(6):26-36.
[42]曾德明,张磊生,禹献云,等.高新技术企业研发国际化进入模式选择研究[J].软科学,2013,27(10):25-28.
[43]武伟.知识产权保护与专利质量关系研究[J].科技促进发展,2017,13(4):269-272.
[45]杜含双,王艳霞.网络结构对期刊知识创新绩效的影响研究[J].图书情报导刊,2019,4(1):40-47.
[46]万小丽.专利质量指标中“被引次数”的深度剖析[J].情报科学,2014,32(1):68-73.
[47]钟熙,宋铁波,陈伟宏,等.外资持股、CEO决策视野与企业研发国际化[J].科学学研究,2020,38(3):496-505.
[48]武志勇,王则仁,马永红.研发投入、国际化程度与制造企业价值的门槛效应分析[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(14):94-101.
[49]冯锋,马雷,张雷勇.两阶段链视角下我国科技投入产出链效率研究——基于高技术产业17个子行业数据[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(10):21-26.