以制度护航伦理:美国大学科研立项的准入制度研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (1098 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The study investigates the access system of scientific research projects in American universities from three approval processes:the education and training at the early stage of investigation,the application of materials audit and assessment,the process supervision after application.It points out the successful experience of the system,such as escalation of legal regulations,economic leverage,third party participation and professional protection.However,the system also faces lots of challenges.For example,the rigidity of the approval process,lack of professional in the field of social sciences review,the contradiction between research freedom and scientific research ethics,the impact of commercial research review agencies on university research review under the market mechanism and so on.This study is designed to provide relevant experience in field survey for researchers and the institutional improvement for scientific research review institutions in China.

Key words： University IRB Research project Access system Training

Received: 08 January 2021

PACS:

G649

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Hanying
	Li Na

Cite this article:

Li Hanying,Li Na. Convoying Ethics in Scientific Research by Institutions:A Study on the Access System of Scientific Research Projects in American Universities[J]. , 2021, 2(10): 170-179.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I10/170

[1]WEINBAUM C,LANDREE E,BLUMENTHAL M S,et al.Ethics in scientific research:an examination of ethical principles and emerging topics[R/OL].[2019-10-09].Santa Monica,CA:RAND Corporation,2019.https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2912.html.
[2]陈传夫,焦钰巧.科研理论规范的调查与体系优化研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (5):28.
[3]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).Trusted by top organizations[EB/OL].[2017-09-18].https://about.citiprogram.org/en/citi-program-advantages/.
[4]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).Mission and history[EB/OL].[2017-09-18].https://about.citiprogram.org/en/mission-and- history/.
[5]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).Human subjects research (HSR)[EB/OL].[2017-08-15].https:// about.citiprogram.org/en/series/human-subjects-research-hsr/.
[6]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).Social-behavioral-educational (SBE)basic[EB/OL].[2021-02-04].https://about.citiprogram.org/en/course/human-subjects-research-2/.
[7]CHARLES L B,RAYMOND G D.Bureaucracies of mass deception:institutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research[J].The annals of the American academy,2004 (595):258.
[8]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).IRB chair[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].https://about.citiprogram.org/en/course/irb-chair-course/.
[9]Stanford University.IRB composition and membership[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].http://researchcompliance.stanford.edu/hs/ hrpp/Documents/hrpp_entire.pdf.
[10]Harvard University.Committee on the use of human subjects.harvard university institutional review boards[EB/OL].[2016-03-21].http:// cuhs.harvard.edu/procedures/harvard-university-irb.
[11]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Office for human research protections.45 CFR 46 subpart A-basic HHS policy for protection of human research subjects 46.107 IRB membership[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html#46.107.
[12]Stanford University.IRB composition and membership[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].http://researchcompliance.stanford.edu/hs/ hrpp/Documents/hrpp_entire.pdf77.
[13]University of Georgia.IRB Meeting preparation[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].https://research.uga.edu/hso/policies-and-procedures/.
[14]FISKE S T.Institutional review boards:from bane to benefit[J].Perspectives on psychological science,2009 (4):30.
[15]Harvard University.Principal investigator eligibility[EB/OL].[2017-05-01].https://research.fas.harvard.edu/policies/principal-investigator-eligibility.
[16]University of Michigan.Research ethics & compliance operations manual part 3-HRPP policy[EB/OL].[2016-03-01].http://research-compliance.umich.edu/operations-manual-part-3-hrpp-policy#irbreview.
[17]University of Georgia,Office of Research.Principal investigator eligibility[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].https://research.uga.edu /hso/policies-and-procedures/.
[18]Harvard University.Do you need a faculty sponsor[EB/OL].[2017-05-01].https://cuhs.harvard.edu/who-needs-facult-sponsor.
[19]蒋惠玲.美国大学伦理审查委员会的运作及其制度基础[J].比较教育研究,2011,33 (3):18.
[20]赛德曼.质性研究中的访谈:教育与社会科学研究者指南 (第三版)[M].周海涛,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009.
[21]UC Berkeley.Informed consent[EB/OL].[2016-03-01].http://cphs.berkeley.edu/informedconsent.html.
[22]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),Office for Human Research Protections.Subpart A-basic HHS policy for protection of human research subjects46.101 To what does this policy apply[EB/OL].[2016-10-25].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html#46.101.
[23]University of Michigan.U-M exemption categories policy on exempt research[EB/OL].[2017-10-31].https://research-compliance.umich.edu/sites/default/files/resource-download/hrpp_operationsmanual.pdf#page=44.
[24]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Regulations,policy & guidance.OHRP expedited review categories[EB/OL].[2017-10-15].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/categories-of-research-expedited-review-procedure-1998/index.html.
[25]LINCOLN Y S,TIERNEY W G.Qualitative research and institutional review boards[J].Qualitative inquiry,2004,10 (2):219-234.
[26]University of Michigan.Continuing review[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].https://research-compliance.umich.edu/sites/default/files/resource-download/hrpp_operationsmanual.pdf#page=22.
[27]Harvard University.Complaints,non-compliance,and suspension or termination of CUHS approval of research[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].https://cuhs.harvard.edu/procedures/complaints-non-compliance-and-suspension-or-termintion-cuhs-approval-research.
[28]Duke University Health System.Continuing review[EB/OL].[2017-09-22].https://irb.duhs.duke.edu/sites/irb.duhs.duke.edu/files/Continuing%20Review.pdf.
[29]Department of Health,Education,and Welfare,Office of the Secretary.Belmont report 1979[EB/OL].[2017-05-01].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf
[30]Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. Institutional review board policy and procedures[EB/OL].https://www.michigan.gov/documents/IRB_PP_Final_155569_7.pdf.
[31]National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.Higher education R&D expenditures,by source of funds:FYs 2011-2019[EB/OL].[2021-02-03].https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21313.
[32]National Science Board.Top six federal agencies'shares of federally funded academic R&D expenditures:FYs2007-16[EB/0L].[2021-02-04].https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/968/tables/tt05-04.pdf
[33]University of Michigan.Operations manual[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].http://research-compliance.umich.edu/operations -manual-contents-page.
[34]Amherst College.IRB policies,procedures,and review guidelines[EB/OL].[2017-04-28].https://www.amherst.edu/academiclife/dean_faculty/faccommittees/irb_iacuc/irb#training.
[35]OCEAN M,HIRSCHI M.Public and tribal community college institutional review boards:a national descriptive analysis[J].Community college journal of research and practice,2016 (40):261.
[36]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Office for human research protections online education[EB/OL].[2016-09-25].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/education-and-outreach/online-education/index.hm.
[37]University of Michigan.PEERRS[EB/OL].[2016-09-25].http://my.research.umich.edu/peers/?_ga=1.89534043.1382855569.1456060001.
[38]Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Program.AAHRPP accredits four more research organizations,including first in Africa,South America[EB/OL].[2021-02-04].https://www.aahrpp.org/learn/find-an-accredited-organization.
[39]The Ohio State University.Information for IRB members[EB/OL].[2017-10-01].http://orrp.osu.edu/files/2016/10/information-for-IRB-Members.pdf.
[40]GRAY B,COOKE R A.The impact of institutional review boards on research[J].Hastings center report,1980,10(1):36.
[41]American Association of University Professors.Institutional review boards and social science research[EB/OL].[2016-09-23].https://www.aaup.org/AAUP/comm/rep/A/protecting.htm.
[42]TIERNEY W G,CORWIN Z B.The tensions between academic freedom and institutional review boards[J].Qualitative inquiry,2007 (13):395.
[43]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Office of inspector general.institutional review boards:the emergence of independent boards[EB/OL].[2017-09-01].https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-97-00192.pdf.