知识管理行为、情境化应用与中小企业创新策略关系研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (849 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Knowledge,as the most critical resource,is the basis of innovation of small and medium enterprises(SMEs).The realization of knowledge management activities and their roles are affected by the context of SMEs.This paper clarifies and analyzes the relationship and roles of the corresponding variables in the concept level,behavior level and tactics level.It draws the conclusions as follows:Improvisational innovation,bricolage innovation and frugal innovation,respectively,needs the support of internal knowledge retrieval,internal knowledge modularity and external knowledge search.Context modeling and context matching results affect knowledge management behavior of SMEs.At the same time,they also moderate the relationships between the knowledge management behaviors and the innovational tactics.SMEs' knowledge management behaviors and the innovational tactics also provide feedback and new requirements to the context modeling and matching results;Meanwhile,the SMEs realize their growth in this two-way path.These conclusions enrich the innovation theory,knowledge management theory and context theory,and also provide some implications for SMEs' innovation strategy choice and knowledge management in various context.

Key words： Knowledge management Innovation tactics Contextualization Resource shortage

Received: 18 July 2017

PACS:

F273

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Xiaoxiang
	Ma Zhujun

Cite this article:

Li Xiaoxiang,Ma Zhujun. Relationships Among Knowledge Management Behavior,Contextualization Application and SMEs' Innovation Tactics[J]. , 2018, 0(5): 71-80.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2018/V0/I5/71

[1] 张磊,郭东强.中外中小企业群知识管理应用的比较分析[J] .情报理论与实践,2010,33(5):26-29.
[2] KEUPP M,GASSMANN O.Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation:longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector[J] .Research policy,2013,42(8):1457-1468.
[3] CUNHA M P,REGO A,OLIVEIR A P,et al.Product innovation in resource-poor environments:three research streams[J] .Journal of product innovation management,2014,31(2):202-210.
[4] GIBBERT M,HOEGL M,VALIKANGAS L.Introduction to the special issue:financial resource constranits and innovation[J] .Journal of product innovation management,2014,31(2):197-201.
[5] MINER A S,BASSOFF P,MOORMAN C.Organizational improvisation and learning:a field study[J] .Administrative science quarterly,2001,46(2):304-337.
[6] MOORMAN C,MINER A S.Organizational improvisation and organizational memory[J] .Academy of management review,1998,23(4):698-723.
[7] DAVIS J P,EISENHARDT K M,BINGHAM C B.Optimal structure,market dynamism,and the strategy of simple rules[J] .Administrative science quarterly,2009,54(3):413-452.
[8] BRADY M.Improvisation versus rigid command and control at Stalingrad[J] .Journal of management history,2011,17(1):27-49.
[9] LVI-STRAUSS C.The savage mind[M] .Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1966:74-77.
[10] BANERJEE P M,CAMPBELL B A.Inventor bricolage and firm technology research and development[J] .R＆D management,2009,39(5):473-487.
[11] DUYMEDJIAN R,RLING C C.Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory[J] .Organization studies,2010,31(2):133-151.
[12] KAMOCHE K,CUNHA M P.Minimal structures:from jazz improvisation to product innovation[J] .Organization studies,2001,22(5):733-764.
[13] CIBORRA C U.Thelabyrinths of information[M] .Oxford:Oxford University Press,2002:25-32.
[14] PRAHALAD C K,MASHELKAR R A.Innovation's holy grail[J] .Harvard business review,2010,88(8):132-141.
[15] SIMANIS E,HART S.Innovation from the inside out[J] .Sloan management review,2009,50(4):77-86.
[16] PRAHALAD C K.Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations[J] .Journal of product innovation management,2012,29(1):6-12.
[17] 买忆媛,叶竹馨,陈淑华.从“兵来将挡,水来土掩”到组织惯例形成——转型经济中新企业的即兴战略研究[J] .管理世界,2015(8):147-165.
[18] BAKER T,NELSON R E.Creating something from nothing:resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage[J] .Administrative science quarterly,2005,50(3):329-366.
[19] GARUD R,KARNOE P.Bricolage versus breakthrough:distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneuship[J] .Research policy,2003,32(2):277-300.
[20] 苏芳,毛基业,谢卫红.资源贫乏企业应对环境剧变的拼凑过程研究[J] .管理世界,2016(8):137-149.
[21] ECONOMIST.The charms of frugal innovation[R] .Special report on innovation in emerging markets:first break all the rules,2010.
[22] GRANT R.Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J] .Strategic management journal,1996,17(1):109-122.
[23] BERTELS T,SAVAGE C.A research agenda for the knowledge era:the tough questions[J] .Knowledge and process management,1999,6(4):205-212.
[24] BASSI L.Harnessing the power of intellectual capital[J] .Training & development,1997,51(12):25-30.
[25] 李江,和金生,王会良,基于情境管理的隐性知识管理方法研究[J] .科学学与科学技术管理,2008(8):77-82.
[26] 潘旭伟,祝锡永,李娜.在情境中实现知识管理[J] .图书情报工作,2011,55(4):95-99.
[27] BARNEY J,ZHANG S.The future of Chinese management research:a theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management[J] .Management and organization review,2009,5(1):15-28.
[28] 张建琦,吴亮,赵兴庐.企业拼凑模式选择对创新结果的影响一基于领域双元的研究视角[J] .科技进步与对策,2015,32(11):61-66.
[29] PRABHU J,JAIN S.Innovation and entrepreneurship in India:understanding jugaad[J] .Asia Pacific journal of management,2015,32(4):843-868.
[30] 陆琦雯.发现小而美的创新企业(之二)[EB/OL] .解放日报,http://finance.china.com.cn/roll/20121230/1215693.shtml.
[31] 彼得·圣吉.第五项修炼一学习型组织的艺术与实务[M] .上海:上海三联书店,1996:24-76.
[32] RADJOU N,PRABHU J,AHUJA S.Jugaad innovation:think frugal,be flexible,generate breakthrough growth[J] .South Asian journal of global business research,2013,38(7):689-691.
[33] TIWARI R,HERSTATT C.Open global innovation networks as enablers of frugal innovation:propositions based on evidence from India[R] .Hamburg:Hamburg University of Technology,2012.
[34] 陆琦雯.发现小而美的创新企业[EB/OL] .解放日报,http://jingji.cntv.cn/2012/12/23/ARTI1356224600051176.shtml.