Abstract：Interest conflicts in scientific data openness represent a core challenge hindering open science.Existing studies suggest that the rights paradigm which empowers data holders often become trapped in endless debates over underlying premises.Regulatory paradigm that improves data openness through administrative intervention fails to motivate proactive sharing.Interest law paradigm shows higher potential.From the interest law perspective,internal causes of conflicts are data value generation particularities;external causes stem from failure of balancing mechanisms due to one-sided evaluation and poor law coordination.Diverse interests share the common goal of“scientific progress”,which can serve as a coordination basis.Upon it,a four-tier hierarchy of interests can be constructed:national security interests,social security interests,individual interests,and social development interests,with higher-tier interests generally taking precedence.To promote social development interests and advance scientific progress,two mechanisms for interest exchange can be designed:first,data holders complying with compliance procedures can be granted immunity from tort liability in cases such as re-identification;second,data holders making data publicly available are guaranteed moral interests such as attribution,recognition,and data integrity.These mechanisms also address the two core interest conflicts in scientific data openness,achieving a win-win outcome by avoiding the sacrifice of one party for the benefit of the other.
邓韬. 利益法学视角下科学数据开放中的利益冲突与法律协调[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(9): 73-81.
Deng Tao. Interest Conflicts and Legal Coordination in the Openness of Scientific Data from the Perspective of Interest Law. , 2026(9): 73-81.
[1] 刘鑫,张俊豪.科学数据开放共享中的知识产权赋权模式研究[J].科技与法律(中英文),2025(6):69-80. [2] 王刚.科研数据的法律属性重释与新知识产权保护范式[J].科技与法律(中英文),2026(1):43-53. [3] 李凡.开放共享视野下科学数据权利配置的实现路径[J].中国科技论坛,2025(2):19-29. [4] Federer L M,Lu Yaling,Joubert D J,et al.Biomedical data sharing and reuse:attitudes and practices of clinical and scientific research staff[J].PLoS ONE,2015,10(6):12. [5] 司莉,贾欢,邢文明.科学数据著作权保护问题与对策研究[J].图书与情报,2015(4):118-122. [6] 咸晨旭.科学数据出版过程法律问题与对策[J].中国出版,2024(18):52-57. [7] 王利明.论数据来源者权利[J].法制与社会发展,2023,29(6):36-57. [8] 丁晓东.论数据来源者权利[J].比较法研究,2023(3):14-25. [9] 申卫星.数据产权:从两权分离到三权分置[J].中国法律评论,2023(6):125-137. [10] 沈婷婷.机会平等视角下社科学者开放数据利用的差异研究[J].图书馆,2025(11):11-16. [11] 中国科学院昆明植物研究所.昆明植物所揭示植物基因组数据共享严峻现状,提出实现数据共享的可行路径[EB/OL].(2026-01-08)[2026-03-10].https://kib.cas.cn/xwzx/ttxw/202601/t20260108_8098925.html. [12] 马忠法,郑文龙.新质生产力语境下科技法与知识产权法关系的再审视[J].科技与法律(中英文),2025(6):1-11. [13] Li Xiaojie,Cong Yali,Liu Ruishuang.Research under China's personal information law:the new law may present obstacles to some kinds of research[J].Science,2022,378(6621):713-715. [14] 刘展.从监管维度看医药企业数据出境治理问题[EB/OL].(2025-03-06)[2026-03-10].https://www.ctils.com/articles/19070. [15] 张建文,张锐.明晰为科学研究目的处理个人信息之法律基础与边界[N].检察日报,2024-02-26(3).
2026, 
