Abstract：Due to the complexity of the policy system and policy environment,the various policy instruments based on different sub-goals and in different fields have led to a more dispersed governance structure of public policies,an increasingly complex management level,and a phenomenon of“fragmentation”of policy functions.During the operation of the policy,there are problems with low system function and counterproductive results.According to the analysis of the policy mix effectiveness of 105 innovation policies and the causes of their problems,this paper proposes a mix model of innovation policy based on the theory of legal system engineering,and constructs a mix process model and its mechanism of innovation policy.It provides a new theoretical perspective for the formulation and implementation of innovation policy from the single factor and unidirectional thinking to the systematic,comprehensive and holistic thinking.
周莹. 基于有效性分析的创新政策组合模式研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(1): 10-16.
Zhou Ying. Research on the Model of Innovation Policy Mix Based on Validity Analysis. , 2021(1): 10-16.
[1] SOETE L,CORPAKIS D.R&D for competitiveness and employment:the role of benchmarking[R/OL].IPTS report http://www.jrc.es/home/report/english/articles/vol71/welcome.htm,2003. [2] FLANAGAN K,UYARRA E,LARANJA M.Reconceptualising the‘policy mix’for innovation[J].Research policy,2011,40(5):702-713. [3] BORRAS S,EDQUIST C.The choice of innovation policy instruments[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2013,80(8):1513-1522. [4] MAGRO E,WILSON J R.Complex innovation policy systems:towards an evaluation mix[J].Research policy,2013,42(9):1647-1656. [5] ROGGE K S,REICHARDT K.Policy mixes for sustainability transitions:an extended concept and framework for analysis[J].Research policy,2016,45(8):1620-1635. [6] COSTANTINI V,CRESPI F,PALMA A.Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation:a patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies[J].Research policy,2017,46(4):799-819. [7] 刘凤朝,马荣康.公共科技政策对创新产出的影响——基于印度的模型构建与实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(5):5-14[8] BRANSCOMB L M,FLORIDA R.Challenges to technology policy[M]//BRANSCOMB L M,KELLER J H.Investing in innovation:creating a research and innovation policy that works.Cambridge,MA and London:MIT Press,1999. [9] 徐喆,李春艳.中国科技政策组合特征及其对产业创新的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2017,35(1):45-53. [10] GUERZONI M,RAITERI E.Demand-side vs.supply-side technology policies:hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix[J].Research policy,2015,44(3):726-747. [11] HOWLETT M,RAYNER J.Patching vs packaging in policy formulation:assessing policy portfolio design[J].Politics and governance,2013,1(2):170-182. [12] RING I,SCHROTER S C.Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies[J].Helmholtz centre for environmental research,2011,23(6):235-256. [13] 朱雪忠.中国专利数量的失控及其危害[EB/OL].(2018-01-13).http://www.sohu.com/a/216559912_275304. [14] TOWSE R.Creativity,copyright and the creative industries paradigm[J].Kyklos,2010,63(3):461-478. [15] 崔雪,郭伟伟.政策组合创新研究[J].合作经济与科技,2016(8):38-39. [16] 熊继宁.社会变革与结构性缺陷[M].北京:法律出版社,1991. [17] 霍宪丹,常远,薛惠锋.如何理解系统视角下的“管理”和“模式”[R]//社会系统工程专家组,北京实现者社会系统工程研究院.“世界化时代卓越治理与社会系统工程”计划研究报告,2008:9. [18] 杨建广,骆梅芬.法治系统工程[M].广州:中山大学出版社,1996. [19] 于景元.从定性到定量综合集成方法及其应用[J].中国软科学,1993(5):31-35. [20] 俞梅荪.中国经济法治系统工程研究的世纪走向[J].现代法学,2000(1):91-94. [21] STEWART J.Public policy values[M].Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan,2009.
2021, 
