Abstract：We use text mining tools and PMC index model to establish the evaluation system of green energy industry innovation policies,and combine the score of PMC and the surface of PMC to quantify the ten innovation policies of green energy industry.The study finds that seven of the ten policies are excellent,three are acceptable,and we find out the weak links of each innovation policy and provide suggestions for improvement.We compare and analyze the innovation policies ranked first and last,and study the differences of policies in depth.On this basis,We put forward a proposal for policy optimization:“Four-Three-Three”principle,which means that we can focus on the four essential characteristics and promote the implementation of the three tools through three main bodies to enhance the effectiveness of innovation policies.Finally,we provide a reasonable suggestion for optimizing the path of green energy industry.The conclusions of this paper can provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of green energy industry innovation policies and an empirical evidence for optimizing the allocation of policy resources.So this paper is of great significance to promote the growth of green energy industry.
刘亭立, 傅秋园. 绿色能源产业创新政策的量化评价与优化路径探究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(10): 82-92.
Liu Tingli, Fu Qiuyuan. Quantitative Evaluation Innovation Policies and Path Selection of the Chinese Green Energy Industry. , 2018(10): 82-92.
[1]EDWARD A.Evaluative research:principles and practice in public service and social action progr[J].Bureau of justice statistics,1968,48(1):92-93. [2]POLAND O F.Program evaluation and administrative theory[J].Public administration review,1974,34(4):333-338. [3]ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Industrial innovation and public policy:preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s[M].London:Frances Printer,1981. [4]ROSALIE R,GRETCHEN J.Over view of evaluation methods for R&D programs[R].Washington,DC:U.S.department of energy office of energy efficiency and renewable energy,2007. [5]魏喜武,薛霞.创新政策的“力”与“能”:创新政策指数构建维度选择[J].科研管理,2016,37(S1):270-274. [6]谢青,田志龙.创新政策如何推动我国新能源汽车产业的发展——基于政策工具与创新价值链的政策文本分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(6):3-14. [7]张丽娜,赵维双.技术创新扩散环境的模糊综合评价模型的建立[J].沈阳工业学院学报,2004(3):88-91. [8]刘晓娥,卢艳红,喻金田.企业技术创新政策效果评价[J].统计与决策,2008(17):56－58. [9]阮陆宁,张华东,叶菲.江西省科技政策实施现状及分析——基于270家企业的问卷调查[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(16):34-38. [10]薛阳,胡丽娜,冯银虎.基于信息熵和TOPSIS的内蒙古科技创新政策绩效评价[J].世界科技研究与发展,2017(6):511-515. [11]沈镭,刘立涛.中国能源政策可持续性评价与发展路径选择[J].资源科学,2009,31(8):1264-1271. [12]谢治国,胡化凯,张逢.建国以来我国可再生能源政策的发展[J].中国软科学,2005(9):50-57. [13]林伯强,李江龙.基于随机动态递归的中国可再生能源政策量化评价[J].经济研究,2014(4):89-103. [14]刘强,田川,陈怡.中国电力行业碳减排相关政策评价[J].资源科学,2017(12):2368-2376. [15]汪继年,陈增帅.清洁能源产业创新政策体系治理研究——以甘肃省为例[J].科技和产业,2014,14(5):139-142. [16]刘宁.我国清洁能源技术的政策保障机制研究[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(4):6-10. [17]赵海滨.政策工具视角下我国清洁能源发展政策分析[J].浙江社会科学,2016(2):140-144. [18]苏竣,张芳.政策组合和清洁能源创新模式:基于光伏产业的跨国比较研究[J].国际经济评论,2015(5):132-142. [19]RUIZ M,YAP F,NAGARAJ S.Beyond the ceteris paribus assumption:modeling demand and supply assuming omnia mobilis[J].International journal of economics research,2008(2):185-194. [20]张永安,耿喆.我国区域科技创新政策的量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(14):26-31. [21]张永安,郄海拓.金融政策组合对企业技术创新影响的量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(2):113-121. [22]张永安,郄海拓.国务院创新政策量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技进步与对策,2017(17):127-136. [23]张永安,周怡园.新能源汽车补贴政策工具挖掘及量化评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(10):188-197.
2018, 
