|
|
|
| Driving Factors of Low-Carbon Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises Based on the Grounded Theory |
| Xu Yingying1, Qi Liangqun1, Lyu Xichen2 |
1.School of Economics and Management,Harbin University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150080,China;
2.School of Management,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The paper explores factors that drive low-carbon innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises to construct research framework based on deep interviews and the grounded theory.Then it puts forward three main categories of low-carbon innovation performance including external relationship quality,external environment quality and enterprise innovation ability.Results show that enterprise innovation ability is a direct driving factor of low-carbon innovation performance,including innovation decision-making ability,resource obtaining ability,technology R&D ability,flexible production ability and low-carbon supportive ability.External relationship quality and external environment quality are both direct and indirect factors of low-carbon innovation performance.And the indirect driving effects are mediated by enterprise innovation ability.
|
|
Received: 15 May 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]马丁,陈文颖.中国2030年碳排放峰值水平及达峰路径研究[J].中国人口资源与环境,2016,26(5):1-4.
[2]徐建中,吕希琛.基于动态集对分析模型的中国制造业低碳化发展测评研究[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(5):49-55.
[3]赵博,毕克新.基于专利的我国制造业低碳突破性创新动态演化规律分析[J].管理世界,2016(7):182-183.
[4]BRUNNERMEIER S B,COHEN M A.Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries[J].Journal of environmental economics and management,2003,45(2):278-293.
[5]URSULA T,JOHANN W.Integrated environmental product innovation in the region of Munich and its impact on company competitiveness[J].Journal of cleaner production,2008(16):1484-1493.
[6]MORRIS A.When green isn't mean:economic theory and the heuristics of the impact of environmental regulations on competitiveness and opportunity cost[J].Ecological economics,2001(36):31-44.
[7]UNRUH G C.Understanding carbon lock-in[J].Energy policy,2000,28(12):817-830.
[8]UNRUH G C.Escaping carbon lock-in[J].Energy policy,2002,30(4):317-325.
[9]UNRUH G C.Globalizing carbon lock-in[J].Energy policy,2006,34(10):1185-1197.
[10]VERGRAGT P J,MARKUSSON N,KARLSSON H.Carbon capture and storage,bio-energy with CCS,and the escape from the fossil-fuel lock-in[J].Global environmental change,2011,21(2):282-292.
[11]华锦阳.制造业低碳技术创新的动力源探究及其政策涵义[J].科研管理,2011,32(6):42-48.
[12]李先江.服务业绿色创业导向、低碳创新和组织绩效间关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,3(8):36-43.
[13]岳书敬,王旭兰,许耀.中国工业行业低碳创新及其影响因素解析[J].财经科学,2014(9):78-87.
[14]徐建中,曲小瑜.低碳情境下装备制造企业技术创新行为的影响因素分析[J].科研管理,2015,36(3):29-37.
[15]周文辉.知识服务、价值共创与创新绩效——基于扎根理论的多案例研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):567-573.
[16]张宝生,张庆普.基于扎根理论的隐性知识流转网成员合作意愿影响因素研究[J].管理学报,2015,12(8):1224-1229.
[17]GOLDKUHL G,CRONHOLM S.Multi-grounded theory-Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory[J].International journal of qualitative methods,2015,9(2):187-205.
[18]FASSINGER R E.Paradigms,praxis,problems and promise:grounded theory in counseling psychology research[J].Journal of counseling psychology,2005,52(2):156-166.
[19]孙晓娥.扎根理论在深度访谈研究中的实例探析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2011,31(6):87-92.
[20]FYNES B,BU＇RCA S D,MARSHALL D.Environmental uncertainty,supply chain relationship quality and performance[J].Journal of purchasing & supply management,2004,10(4-5):179-190.
[21]徐建中,李奉书,李丽,等.企业外部关系质量对低碳技术创新的影响:基于知识视角的研究[J].中国软科学,2017(2):183-192.
[22]MADHOK A,TALLMAN S B.Resources,transactions and rents:managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships[J].Organization science,1998(9):326-339.
[23]BARTOLONI E,BAUSSOLA M.Does technological innovation undertaken alone have a real pivotal role? Product and marketing innovation in manufacturing firms[J].Economics of innovation & new technology,2016,25(2):1-23. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 0 
