中国碳减排政策的量化评价

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download: PDF (4338 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The policy tools to mitigate climate change are mainly command and control regulation based on administrative,carbon trading based on total amount control and carbon tax based on price control.This article established a PMC index model combined with the text mining method to make quantitative evaluation on the command and control regulation,carbon trading and carbon tax policy.And it put forward suggestions to discuss which method was more suitable for China's future application.The results showed that the performance of carbon trading was the best,carbon tax performance was good,the result of the command and control regulation was not very ideal.Finally,we proposed the some pertinence suggestions on the implementation of carbon reduction policy combined with the PMC index model.

Key words： Carbon reduction policy PMC index model Text mining Quantitative evaluation

Received: 23 March 2017

PACS:

C91

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhao Lixiang
	Tang Jing

Cite this article:

Zhao Lixiang,Tang Jing. The Quantitative Evaluation of China's Carbon Reduction Policies Based on the Index of PMC Model[J]. , 2018, 0(1): 116-122.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2018/V0/I1/116

[1]METCALF G E.Market-based policy options to control U.S.greenhouse gas emissions[J].Journal of economic perspectives,2009,23(2):5-27.
[2]GREEN,RICHARD.Carbon tax or carbon permits:the impact on generators'risks[J].The energy journal,2008,29(3):67-89.
[3]BRISTOW A L,WARDMAN M,ZANNI A M,et al.Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax[J].Ecological economics,2010,69(9):1824-1837.
[4]FELL H,BURTRAW D,MORGENSTERN R D,et al.Soft and hard price collars in a cap-and-trade system:a comparative analysis[J].Journal of environmental economics & management,2012,64(2):183-198.
[5]李伯涛.碳定价的政策工具选择争论:一个文献综述[J].经济评论,2012(02):153-160.
[6]石敏俊,袁永娜,周晟吕,李娜.碳减排政策:碳税、碳交易还是两者兼之[J].管理科学学报,2013(09):9-19.
[7]谢来辉.碳交易还是碳税? 理论与政策[J].金融评论,2011(06):103-110+126.
[8]雷仲敏,周广燕,邱立新.基于费-效分析框架的国家节能减排政策绩效评价研究——以山东省为例[J].区域经济评论,2013(04):86-93.[9]陆敏,李岩岩.基于GM(1,1)模型的我国若干节能减排政策评价研究[J].生态经济,2014(09):45-49.
[10]邱立新.节能减排政策传导机制与效应评价——以山东省为例[J].科技管理研究,2012(07):25-28+32.
[11]俞业夔,李林军,李文江,冯文娟,王璐,邱国玉.中国碳减排政策的适用性比较研究——碳税与碳交易[J].生态经济,2014(05):77-81.
[12]ESTRADA M A R.Policy modeling:definition,classification and evaluation[J].Journal of policy modeling,2010,33(4):523-536.
[13]RUIZ Estrada M A,YAP S F,NAGARAJ S.Beyond the ceteris paribus assumption:modeling demand and supply assuming omnia mobilis[J].Social science electronic publishing,2008(2):185-194.
[14]张永安,郄海拓.金融政策组合对企业技术创新影响的量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技进步与对策,2017(02):113-121.
[15]曹军新,姚斌.碳减排与金融稳定:基于银行信贷视角的分析[J].中国工业经济,2014(09):97-108.
[16]崔金星.中国碳交易法律促导机制研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012(08):33-40.
[17]许士春.排污税与减排补贴的减排效应比较研究[J].上海经济研究,2012(07):14-21.
[18]金培振,张亚斌,彭星.技术进步在二氧化碳减排中的双刃效应——基于中国工业35个行业的经验证据[J].科学学研究,2014(05):706-716.
[19]沈月琴,曾程,王成军,朱臻,冯娜娜.碳汇补贴和碳税政策对林业经济的影响研究——基于CGE的分析[J].自然资源学报,2015(04):560-568.
[20]龚利,田瑾.碳减排政策的影响效应研究综述[J].华东经济管理,2013(07):160-163.
[21]孙睿,况丹,常冬勤.碳交易的"能源-经济-环境"影响及碳价合理区间测算[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014(07):82-90.
[22]张翼,卢现祥.公众参与治理与中国二氧化碳减排行动——基于省级面板数据的经验分析[J].中国人口科学,2011(03):64-72+112.
[23]薄燕.合作意愿与合作能力——一种分析中国参与全球气候变化治理的新框架[J].世界经济与政治,2013(01):135-155+160.
[24]张晓娣.差异化碳税的福利及就业影响分析——跨期CGE框架下的情景模拟[J].经济科学,2015(05):70-82.