|
|
The Development Strategy of Chinese Scientific Community Internal Awards in New Period——In the Perspective of Government Function Transfer and Decentralization |
Xiong Xiaogang1,2 |
1.College of Public Administration,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China;
2.College of Finance and Public Administration,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330013,China |
|
|
Abstract The scientific community awards have larger authority and social influence in the academic peers,industry field and the whole society,which represents a higher level of the social power science and technology awards.The awards in science and technology of the societies under the China Association for Science and Technology are the main body and typical demonstration of the scientific community awards,which had set 108 awards by 207 associations,accounted for 49 percents of the whole social power science and technology awards.Compared with the other social power science and technology awards,the awards in science and technology of the societies have many significant advantages such as undertaking the government transfer functions,recommending national science and technology award directly and having a larger social influence.But,the awards in science and technology of the societies also have much inadequacy in award quantity,international openness,award way,review process,award management,social perception.Promoting the awards in science and technology of the societies better needs government,CAST and association to strive together.The government department should transform function to giving a bigger development space for the association awards.The CAST should guide actively and support vigorously.The association awards should strengthen the management and expand the influence
|
Received: 10 May 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1]张忠奎.大力培育和推进科学共同体的奖励活动[J] .科研管理,1996(2):10-12.
[2] 徐顽强,熊小刚.中国非政府科技奖励的发展现状、动因及趋势[J] .中国科技论坛,2010(6):13-16.
[3] 尚宇红,严卫宏.中国科技奖励体系的结构分析[J] .科学技术与辩证法,2003(4):47-50.
[4] 国务院.关于深化科技奖励制度改革方案的通知(国办函〔2017〕55号)[EB/OL] .http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-06/09/content_5201043.htm.
[5] 国务院.关于取消和下放一批行政审批项目等事项的决定(国发〔2013〕19号)[EB/OL] .http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-05/15/content_2403676.htm.
[6] 国家科学技术奖励工作办公室.社会科技奖励登记审批名单[EB/OL] .http://www.nosta.gov.cn/web/detail.aspx?menuID=34&contentID=266.
[7] 中国科学技术协会.全国学会名单[EB/OL] .http://www.cast.org.cn/n17040442/n17042572/index.html.
[8] 徐顽强,熊小刚.国家科技奖励体系中的非政府奖项研究[M] .北京:中国科学技术出版社,2013:67.
[9] 徐顽强,熊小刚,李月.科研人员申报社会力量科技奖励的意愿研究[J] .中国软科学,2010(4):80-87.
[10] 默顿.科学社会学[M] .北京:商务印书馆,2003:269.
[11] 姚昆仑.中国科学技术奖励制度研究[D] .中国科学技术大学博士学位论文,2007:163.[1] 王研,张陆.中国科技社团奖励的发展现状及对策建议[J] .未来与发展,2016(2):13-17.
[13] 边全乐,孙建鸿.中国科技社团社会奖励工作基本状况、存在问题及发展对策[J] .农学学报,2012(12):69-78.
[14] 曲安京.中国近现代科技奖励制度[M] .济南:山东教育出版社,2005:92.
[15] 中国科协组织人事部.中国科协及所属全国学会奖项简介[M] .北京:中国科学技术出版社,2015.
[16] 张陆,王研.中美科学共同体设立科技奖励比较——以中国科协和美国科促会为例[J] .科技管理研究,2013(20):45-49.
[17] 熊小刚.国家科技奖励制度运行绩效的投入产出分析[J] .科学学与科学技术管理,2012(3):5-10.
[18] 肖利,汪飚翔,耿雁.中国科技奖励体系的缺失——基于中美国际科技奖的比较研究[J] .科学学研究,2016(5):660-667.
[19] 熊小刚.国家科技奖励制度运行绩效评价[M] .北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013:213.
[20] 中国科协.学会承接政府职能,承接的是服务不是权力[J] .学会,2015(9):26-27.
[21] 徐顽强,熊小刚.中国非政府奖项品牌化发展研究——以何梁何利奖为例[J] .软科学,2011(3):13-17. |
|
|
|