引入情境调节的企业社会资本对双元创新的影响机制

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (14)

Download: PDF (1258 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the academia,this study constructed the theoretical model of corporate social capital affecting enterprise’s ambidextrous innovation,under the adjustment of context.We chose 384 companies in Guangdong and Shanghai as samples to conduct empirical test.The results shows that institutional social capital and technological social capital have positive effect on ambidextrous innovation,but the business social capital can only promote the exploitative innovation,and exploratory innovation does not play a significant role.The good institutional environment strengthens the positive impact of corporate social capital on exploitative innovation,but weakens the positive role of social capital on exploratory innovation.Compared with the state-owned enterprises,non-state-owned enterprises strengthen the positive effect of corporate social capital on the exploitative innovation,but weaken the positive effect of corporate social capital on exploratory innovation.High-tech enterprises can make more efficient use of social capital to exploitative innovation.The findings mentioned above reveal the internal mechanism of corporate social capital affecting enterprise’s ambidextrous innovation.

Key words： Ambidextrous innovation Exploitative innovation Exploratory innovation Institutional environment

Received: 30 December 2016

PACS:	F273.1
	F224

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zeng Ping
	Xia Xiuyun
	Huang Ziwei

Cite this article:

Zeng Ping,Xia Xiuyun,Huang Ziwei. Impacts of Corporate Social Capital on Enterprise’s Ambidextrous Innovation in Context Factors[J]. , 2017, 0(9): 86-97.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V0/I9/86

[1] 王凤彬,陈建勋,杨阳.探索式与利用式技术创新及其平衡的效应分析[J].管理世界,2012(3):96-112.
[2]曾萍,刘洋,应瑛.转型经济背景下后发企业创新追赶路径研究综述——技术创新抑或商业模式创新[J].研究与发展管理,2015,27(3):1-7.
[3]BATJARGA B.Comparative social capital:networks of entrepreneurs and venture capitalists in China and Russia[J].Management and organization review,2007,3(3):397-419.
[4]HE Z L,WONG P K.Exploration vs.exploitation:an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J].Organization science,2004,15:481-494.
[5]MARCH J G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational llearning[J].Organization science,1991(2):71-87.
[6]DANNEELS E.The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences[J].Strategic management journal,2002,(23):1095-1121.
[7]JANSEN J J P,FAJVD B,VOLBERDA H W.Exploratory innovation,exploitative innovation,and performance:effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J].Management science,2006,52(11):1661-1674.
[8]BENNER M J,TUSHMAN M L.Exploitation,exploration,and process management:the productivity dilemma revisited[J].Academy of management review,2003,(28):238-256.
[9]GUPTA A,SMITH K G,Shalley C E.The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J].Academy of management journal,2006,49(4):693-706.
[10]AUH S,MENGUC B.Balancing exploration and exploitation:the moderating role of competitive intensity[J].Journal of business research,2005,58(12):1652-1661.
[11]HOLMQVIST M.Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations:an empirical study of product development[J].Organization science,2004,15(1):70-81.
[12]TUSHMAN M L,O’REILLY C A.The ambidextrous organization:managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J].California management review,1996,38(4):1-23.
[13]马蓝,安立仁,张宸璐.合作经验、双元学习能力对合作创新绩效的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2016(3):42-48.
[14]李忆,司有和.探索式创新、利用式创新与绩效:战略和环境的影响[J].南开管理评论,2008,11(5):4-12.
[15]吴俊杰,盛亚,姜文杰.企业家社会网络、双元性创新与技术创新绩效研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(2):11-43.
[16]TSAI W,GHOSHAL S.Social Capital and value creation:the role of intrafirm networks[J].The academy of management journal,1998,41(4):464-476.
[17]边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):87-100.
[18]张方华.企业社会资本与技术创新绩效:概念模型与实证分析[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(3):47-53.
[19]王国顺,杨昆.社会资本、吸收能力对创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].管理科学,2011,24(5):23-36.
[20]曾萍,邓腾智,宋铁波.社会资本、动态能力与企业创新关系的实证研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(4):50-59.
[21]韦影.企业社会资本与技术创新:基于吸收能力的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(9):119-127.
[22]陈劲,李飞宇.社会资本:对技术创新的社会学诠释[J].科学学研究,2001,19(3):103-107.
[23]曾萍,刘洋,吴小节.政府支持对企业技术创新的影响——基于资源基础管与制度基础管的整合视角[J].经济管理,2016,38(2):14-25.
[24]曾萍,邬绮虹,蓝海林.政府的创新支持政策有效吗？基于珠三角企业的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(4):10-20.
[25]曾萍,邬绮虹.政府支持与企业创新:研究述评与未来展望[J].研究与发展管理,2014,26(2):98-109.
[26]王鹏,张淑贤.产学研创新合作网络的社会资本结构维度研究——基于2006—2014年广东省产学研合作专利申请数据分析[J].中国科技论坛,2016(7):16-22.
[27]耿新,张体勤.企业家社会资本对组织动态能力的影响——以组织宽裕为调节变量[J].管理世界,2010(6):121-142.
[28]查成伟,陈万明,彭灿.外部社会资本、失败学习与突破性创新[J].中国科技论坛,2015(2):109-113,136.
[29]维杰·萨思.公司的企业家精神:高层管理者和业务创新[M].邢华,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[30]KNACK S,KEEFER P.Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation[J].Quarterly journal of economics,1997,112(4):1251-1288.
[31]邹国庆,倪昌红.经济转型中的组织冗余与企业绩效:制度环境的调节作用[J].中国工业经济,2010,272(11):120-129.
[32]马富萍,茶娜.环境规制对技术创新绩效的影响研究——制度环境的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(1):60-66,77.
[33]PENG M W,TAN J,TONG T W.Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy[J].Journal of management studies,2004,41(7):1105-1129.
[34]贺京同,高林.企业所有权、创新激励政策及其效果研究[J].财经研究,2012,38(3):15-25.
[35]李婧.政府R&D资助对企业技术创新的影响——一个基于国有与非国有企业的比较研究[J].研究与发展管理,2013,25(3):18-24.
[36]孙永正.不同性质工业企业三维绩效比较研究——基于 2005—2007年我国工业企业统计数据[J].经济学家,2010(1):103-104.
[37]李维安,邱艾超,阎大颖.企业政治关系研究脉络梳理与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2010,32(5):48-55.
[38]游达明,李志鹏,杨晓辉.高新技术企业创新网络能力对创新网络绩效的影响路径[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(2):70-82.
[39]樊纲,王小鲁,马光荣.中国市场化进程对经济增长的贡献[J].经济研究,2011(9):4-16.
[40]温军,冯根福.异质机构、企业性质与自主创新[J].经济研究,2012(3):53-64.
[41]曾萍,蓝海林.企业成长战略的政府导向抑或市场导向:珠三角173个样本[J].改革,2013(10):115-124.
[42]曾萍,吕迪伟,刘洋.技术创新、政治关联与政府创新支持:机制与路径[J].科研管理,2016,37(7):17-26.