制度环境与中国高技术产业技术效率

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5776 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This paper selects the panel data of high-tech industries in 30 provinces of China from 2009 to 2015,and uses the three-stage DEA model to measure the technical efficiency of high-tech industries.At the same time,based on the spatial econometric models,it studies the impact of institutional environment in the region and adjacent areas on the technical efficiency of high-tech industries.The results show that the average technical efficiency of the high-tech industry is 0.392,which is lower than the initial efficiency of 0.649.The technical is mainly subject to low-level scale efficiency.And there is a spatial spillover effect on the technical efficiency.It is influenced by the institutional environment of the region and surrounding areas.The development of non-state-owned economy and product market is conducive to improve the technical efficiency of high-tech industries in the region and adjacent areas.The development of factor markets cannot promote the technical efficiency of high-tech industries in the region and adjacent areas.The intermediary organization and legal system environment have positive direct impact on the technical efficiency of high-tech industries in the region,but there is no significant spillover effect.

Key words： Institutional environment High-tech industry Technical efficiency Three-stage DEA Spatial econometrics

Received: 20 May 2019

PACS:

F273.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Sun Jinyun
	Yu Mingchao
	Wei Zhentao

Cite this article:

Sun Jinyun,Yu Mingchao,Wei Zhentao. Institutional Environment and Technical Efficiency of Chinese High-tech Industries[J]. , 2020, 1(1): 80-87.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V1/I1/80

[1]FARRELL M J.The measurement of productive efficiency[J].Journal of the royal statistic society,1957,Ser.A 120:253-281.
[2]戴魁早.制度环境、区域差异与知识生产效率——来自中国省际高技术产业的经验证据[J].科学学研究,2015,33(3):369-377.
[3]胡晓珍,张卫东,杨龙.制度环境、技术效率与区域经济增长差异[J].公共管理学报,2010,7(2):79-88.
[4]余泳泽,周茂华.制度环境、政府支持与高技术产业研发效率差异分析[J].财经论丛,2010,153(5):1-5.
[5]田刚,李南.中国物流业技术进步与技术效率研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009(2):76-87.
[6]韩忠雪,崔建伟.技术高管、制度环境与技术效率[J].软科学,2015,29(3):33-37.
[7]刘广斌,李建坤.基于三阶段DEA模型的我国科普投入产出效率研究[J].中国软科学,2017(5):139-148.
[8]顾雪松,韩立岩.市场化进程与对外直接投资的技术溢出效应[J].科研管理,2018,39(6):150-158.
[9]罗党论,唐清泉.中国民营上市公司制度环境与绩效问题研究[J].经济研究,2009(2):106-118.
[10]胡凯,吴清.税收激励、制度环境与企业研发支出[J].财贸经济,2018(1):38-53.
[11]姚洋.非国有经济成分对我国工业企业技术效率的影响[J].经济研究,1998(12):29-35.
[12]邹小芃,叶子涵,杨亚静.文化资本、制度环境对区域金融中心的影响[J].经济地理,2018(4):73-80.
[13]杨青峰.剥离环境因素的中国区域高技术产业技术效率再估计——基于三阶段DEA模型的研究[J].产业经济研究,2014(4):94-102.
[14]石旻,张大永,邹沛江,等.中国新能源行业效率——基于DEA方法和微观数据的分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2016(4):60-77.
[15]王小鲁,樊纲,余静文.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.
[16]郭亚军.基于三阶段DEA模型的工业生产效率研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(11):16-23.
[17]BALTAGI B H.Econometric analysis of panel data[M].New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons,2013.
[18]LEE L F,YU J.Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects[J].Journal of econometrics,2010(154):165-185.
[19]白俊红,王钺,蒋伏心,等.研发要素流动、空间知识溢出与经济增长[J].经济研究,2017(7):111-125.