对撞机:物理学的进步或诘难？——从SSC、LHC看基础物理“大科学”工程的争议

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (1096 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract There is full of contention research project interests,the size of the scientific dispute,cognition and dispute in SSC and LHC projects,which eventually led to the application of the different fates.As the increasingly close ties between science and technologe and society,the depth and breadth of public participation in science continue to expand,and even have a significant impact on the scientific process.From SSC and LHC projects,the paper analyzes dispute in“Big Science”projects of the basic physics,and puts some suggestions.

Key words： SSC LHC High energy physics Big Science project

Received: 22 September 2016

PACS:

B26

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Liu Yiming
	Lai Yanru

Cite this article:

Liu Yiming,Lai Yanru. Collider:Physical Progress or Criticism?——The Dispute of“Big Science”Projects in Basic Physics from the SSC and LHC Projects[J]. , 2017, 0(9): 16-22.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V0/I9/16

[1] 高原,王大明.美国超导超级对撞机案例研究[J].工程研究,2011,3(42).
[2]黄涛.超级超导对撞机(SSC)物理[J].现代物理知识,1993,5(15).
[3]迈克尔·马尔凯.科学与知识社会学[M].林聚任,等译.北京:东方出版社,2001.
[4]张九庆.从超导超级对撞机(SSC)看大科学工程研究的实施[EB/OL].科学网,http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-542-311210.html,2010-04-12.
[5]Air Products and Chemicals,INC.,Armco INC,Asea Brown Boveri,et al.Testimony before the Committee on Energy and National Resources Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development United States Senate on the FY’89 Request for the Superconducting Super Collider[A].United States,Congress,Senate,Committee on Energy and Natural Resources,Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development.1988-04-12.
[6]Superconducting super collider:joint hearing before the committee on energy and natural resources and the subcommittee on energy and water development of the committee on appropriations,United States Senate,one hundred third congress,first session,on the department of energy’s superconducting super collider project[M].Washington:U.S.G.P.O.,1993:57,60.
[7]Basic science budget and SSC:hearing before the subcommittee on energy research and development of the committee on energy and natural resources,United States Senate,one hundredth congress,second session on the department of energy’s fiscal year 1989 request for the superconducting super collider and the basic science budget,April 12,1988[M].Washington:U.S.G.P.O.,1988:240-241.
[8]董丽丽.科研立项中的利益冲突[D].内蒙古师范大学,2007:25-30.
[9]温伯格.终极理论之梦[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2003:225.
[10]卢广彦.重大工程决策失误与重大工程决策机制构建[J].中国科技论坛,2009(4).
[11]KOLBERT E.Crash course——Can a seventeen-mile-long collider unlock the universe?[N].The New Yorker,2007-05-14.
[12]大型对撞机启动在即遭起诉称会终结世界[N].搜狐科学,2008-09-01.
[13]陈蓉霞.公众是否有权对强子对撞机说“不”[N].东方早报,2008-09-11.
[14]大型强子对撞机[EB/OL].百度百科,http://baike.baidu.com/view/362760.html,2016-11-01.
[15]周蕾.上帝粒子:一只看不见的足球[J].悦读周刊,2012-07-12.
[16]Subaru211.高能物理的绝唱[EB/OL].水木社区,http://newsmth.net/nForum/#!article/TheoPhys/35749,2016-08-10.
[17]申丹娜.大科学与小科学的争论评述[J].科学技术与辩证法,2009:104.
[18]江晓原.对撞机:物理学家的一个大玩具？[N].中华读书报,2008-10-15.
[19]戴建平,古荒.梦想与幻灭——超导超级对撞机的曲折命运[J].科技与经济,2005,1(64).
[20]高原.美国超导超级对撞机工程浅探[J].第三届全国科技哲学暨交叉学科研究生论坛文集,2010(439).
[21]张健.世界最大对撞机LHC启动在即,霍金对其充满期待[N].南方报业网,2008-09-04.