区域创新极化效应的城市贡献度——基于分解TW指数的空间计量研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (4909 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the data of 16 cities in Anhui Province for six years,we used the decomposed TW index,proposed the“urban contribution to regional innovation polarization”and carried out the spatial econometrics research.The results showed that the number of the innovation ability of cities in Anhui province was“dicaryon”distribution,and the urban contribution to regional innovation polarization was“I-section”distribution.The urban innovation ability in this region did not necessarily promote or push down the innovation polarization of the whole region.The remission of polarization effect should focus on the cities with medium innovation ability.The urban contribution to regional innovation polarization could accurately identify the internal reasons of polarization.In addition,the urban contribution to regional innovation polarization in Anhui Province had spatial negative correlation characteristics,and the spatial pattern was relatively stable.For instance,Hefei,Wuhu and Chizhou formed the center of innovation polarization in Anhui Province.The urban contribution to regional innovation polarization in south of Anhui Province was staggered,however the innovation polarization pole in Anhui Province was shortage.The urban contribution to regional innovation polarization in Anhui was evolved from Spatial Discrete to Spatial Agglomeration

Key words： Urban innovation ability Polarization effect Contribution degree to polarization TW index

Received: 12 December 2016

PACS:

C916

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Chengcheng
	Li Hongmei
	Wei Shouming

Cite this article:

Wang Chengcheng,Li Hongmei,Wei Shouming. Urban Contribution to Regional Innovation Polarization: A Spatial Econometric Study Based on Decomposition of TW Index[J]. , 2017, 0(8): 94-102.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V0/I8/94

[1]赵映慧,修春亮,姜博,等.1990年代以来空间极化研究综述[J].经济地理,2010,30(3):383-387.
周密.我国创新极化现象的区域分布与极化度比较[J].当代经济科学,2007,29(1):78-82.
MOHNEN P,DEBRESSON C,et al.Explaining and estimating propensities to innovate in China in 1993[C].The 14^th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques,Canada.2002,part four:1-37,part five:1-32.
王金岩,吴殿延,袁俊.鲁南地区经济空间差异与发展战略探讨[J].商业研究,2008(8):119-124.
陈利.地理空间异质性、依赖性与新型工业化地域差异——以云南省为例[J].经济问题探索,2012(12):14-21.
蔡芳芳,濮励杰,张健,等.基于ESDA的江苏省县域经济发展空间模式解析[J].经济地理,2012,32(3):22-28
赵翠霞,李岩,兰庆高.城郊失地农民收入“极化”及深层原因分析[J].农村经济,2015(4):54-59.
李文亮,于长钺,许正中.基于空间效应的我国信息产业效率演进的时空特征研究[J].情报科学,2015(4):9-12.
宋丽思,陈向东.我国四大城市区域创新空间极化趋势的比较研究[J].中国软科学,2009(10):100-108.
邓向荣,周密,李伟.我国科技创新极化度指数的构造及区域比较[J].财经研究,2007,33(6):67-76.
邓向荣,李伟.中国区域创新极化趋势及其特征研究[J].科学管理研究,2007,25(5):5-9.
邓向荣,刘璇.京津冀和长三角地区创新极化与扩散效应比较研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007(11):16-20.
王松,胡树华.国家高新区强弱空间极化的演化分析[J].科研管理,2012,33(3):121-127.
金凤花,富立友,钟伟.都市圈创新能力极化发展实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(10):37-41.
WANG Y Q,TSUI K Y.Polarization orderings and new classes of polarization indices[J].Journal of public economic theory,2000,2(3):349-363.
许吉黎,韩玉刚,杨显明.安徽省城市科技创新能力评价及格局分析——兼论省域科技创新体系的发展模式[J].地域研究与开发,2013,32(5):51-56.
周密.我国科技创新极化度的区域比较——兼论区域科技和谐度的构建[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(7):59-63.
杜鹏程,李敏.安徽省自主创新能力比较分析及预测[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,37(4):149-156.
金凤花,余光胜.上海都市圈创新能力评价研究——基于因子分析和聚类分析[J].科技管理研究,2013,33(12):13-16.
姚海华.长三角城市的贸易集聚效应与上海的贸易辐射效应研究[J].华东经济管理,2012,26(11):1-6.
汪志,焦华富,郇恒飞.皖江城市带县域经济发展差异演变特征分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2011,27(1):53-58.
赵彦云,扈瑞鹏.中国省域农村居民消费的空间分析[J].消费经济,2014(1):15-22.
张松林,张昆.空间自相关局部指标Moran指数和G系数研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2007,27(3):31-34.
孙蕾,常天骄,郭全毓.中国人口老龄化空间分布特征及与经济发展的同步性研究[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(3):123-132+155-156.
杨宇,刘毅,金凤君,等.天山北坡城镇化进程中的水土资源效益及其时空分异[J].地理研究,2012,31(7):1185-1198.
高丽娜,朱舜,李洁.创新集聚与溢出、空间效应与长三角城市群协同发展[J].华东经济管理,2016,30(5):81-85.
严建援,甄杰,董坤祥,等.区域协同发展下创新资源集聚路径和模式研究——以天津市为例[J].华东经济管理,2016,30(7):1-7+193.