|
|
|
| Functions Change of Hi-tech Development Area Administrative Committee on the Background of Development Driven by Innovation |
| Zhou Haiyuan |
| Research Centre of Rule of Law Strategy on China,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201600,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Powers of hi-tech development area administrative committee assume different forms at stage of startups,second venture,expansions and constructing National Independent Innovative Demonstration Zones,which extremely expand and go beyond original design.This situation did not have any constitutional basis.The 13th Five-Year Plan requests government functions should realize transformation from research management to innovative services,which both has base of law and realism.So,it is necessary to separate hi-tech development area administrative committee and local government in organization construction,peeling away management function and strengthen service functions,constructing relation of guide rather than leader between hi-tech development area administrative committee and local government,and giving authority to technology companies to supervise hi-tech development area Administrative Committee to realize these transformation.
|
|
Received: 01 June 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 汪长根,陈楚九.苏州新区第二次创业研究[J].江南论坛,1997(10):23-24.
[2]王琛伟.我国行政体制改革演进轨迹:从“管理”到“治理”[J].改革,2014(6):52-58.
[3]张乾友.变革社会中的服务型政府建设——任务型组织的途径[J].北京行政学院学报,2014(1):43-49.
[4]王锋,郭哲.行政模式的范式变迁[J].求实,2015(3):65-73.
[5]江国华,张倩.权力的分解、位移与下沉——写在1982年《宪法》实施三十周年之际[J].法学杂志,2012(7):12-15.
[6]王德志.论我国学术自由的宪法基础[J].中国法学,2012(5):5-23.
[7]王育宝,胡芳肖.科技园区持续发展的机制探讨[J].中国科技论坛,2016(5):91-96.
[8]王克稳.我国行政审批制度的改革及其法律规制[J].法学研究,2014(2):3-19.
[9]吴新叶.基层治理需要跨越科层制范式的藩篱——与王龙飞博士商榷[J].探索与争鸣,2016(1):55-58.
[10]程志波.论我国当前科学宏观管理体制改革的若干问题[J].中国科技论坛,2014(12):34-43.
[11]周国辉.重心要放到强化创新服务上[N].科技日报,2016-03-16,(003).
[12]易继明.论行业协会市场化改革[J].法学家,2014(4):33-48. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 0 
