|
|
|
| Comparative Analysis and Inspiration of Higher Education Institution’s Research Evaluation System of UK,Australia and New Zealand |
| Zhang Lingge1,2,Han Mingjie2,Zhao Yong2,Li Chenying2 |
1.Library of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Shanghai 201620,China;
2.Library of China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper uses the methods of literature research and content analysis to comb the Higher Education Institution’s Research Evaluation System in the present UK,Australia and New Zealand.It focuses on the composition method,avoidance rule and confidentiality duties of experts.The paper studied the practice features and inspiration of Research Evaluation System of the three countries,which involved composition rules of structure of experts group,selection of experts source,dispose of interest conflicts and confidential duties of evaluation experts.This study was in order to provide reference for experts selection of China’s scientific research evaluation system
|
|
Received: 03 May 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 蔡琼,苏丽,丁宇.基于国家主导的科研评价模式的制度逻辑[J].科技进步与对策,2009(19):116-119.
[2] RAE 2008.Research assessment exercise[R/OL].(2015-07-14)[2016-04-20].http://www.rae.ac.uk/ .
[3] HANAN Khazragui,JOHN Hudson.Measuring the benefits of university research:impact and the REF in the UK[J].Research evaluation.2015(24):51-62.
[4] REF 2014.Assessment criteria and level definitions[R/OL].(2015-08-13)[2016-03-20].http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/.
[5] 蒋玉梅.全球科研评价体系的演进与发展——以美国、 英国、 澳大利亚、 荷兰四国为例[J] 国家教育行政学院学报,2013(9):81-86.
[6] Australian Research Council.ERA National Reports[R/OL].(2015-08-13)[2016-04-10].http://www.arc.gov.au/era-reports.
[7] DIANA Hicks.Performance-based university research funding systems[J].Performance-based university research funding systems,2012(41):251-261..
[8] Tertiary Education Commission.PBRF quality evaluation guidelines 2012[R/OL].(2016-01-30)[2016-04-20].New Zealand:TEC,2012..
[9] ANNA Dickinson.Panel criteria and working methods[R/OL].(2016-03-28)[2016-04-20].http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/panelcriteriaandworkingmethods/01_12.pdf.
[10] Australian Research Council.ERA 2015 Evaluation Handbook[R/OL].(2016-03-25)[2016-04-10].http://www.arc.gov.au/era-2015-key-documents.
[11] The Tertiary Education Commission.Peer Review Panel nomination and selection process for the 2018 Quality Evaluation[R/OL].(2016-01-30)[2016-04-15].http://www.tec.govt.nz/Funding/Fund-finder/Performance-Based-Research-Fund-PBRF-/2018-Quality-Evaluation/. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 0 
