|
|
|
| Technological Diversification and Firm Performance |
| Zhang Qinglei1,Zheng Ying2,Ren Hualiang3,Shi Jianjun4 |
1.School of Marketing and Logistics,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210046,China;
2.School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China;
3.School of Business,Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214064,China;
4.University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100020,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper shows clearly that there are two mechanisms underlying the relationship between technological diversification and firm performance,Economies of scope and cost of coordination.It argues technological diversification affecting firm performance depends on which mechanism plays a decisive role.It also examines the moderating role of the level of investible resources available to the firm,environmental dynamism and institutional environment with Chinese characteristics on the relationship between technological diversification and firm performance.The paper uses an unbalanced panel data between 2009 and 2012,from 286 public companies listed on GEM in China.Results show that the relationship between technological diversification and firm performance is negatively moderated by the level of the constraint of investible resources available to the firm and environmental dynamism,but positively moderated by institutional environment.Besides that,we also find that the negative effect of the constraint of investible resources on the relationship between technological diversification and firm performance is negatively moderated by environmental dynamism,but positively moderated by institutional environment.The study shows that the corporation should consider internal resources and external environment when making its technological diversification strategy choice for the purpose of competitive advantage.
|
|
Received: 27 August 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 何郁冰,陈劲.技术多元化战略与企业竞争优势关系研究述评[J].科研管理,2013(34):10-20,31.
[2]GRANSTRAND O.Towards a theory of the technology-based firm[J].Research policy,1998,27(5):465-89.
[3]MONTGOMERY C A,WERNERFELT B.Diversification,Ricardian rents,and Tobin's q[J].The RAND journal of economics,1988:623-32.
[4]KAUL A.Technology and corporate scope:firm and rival innovation as antecedents of corporate transactions[J].Strategic management journal,2012,33(4):347-67.
[5]DESS G G,BEARD D W.Dimensions of organizational task environments[J].Administrative science quarterly,1984:52-73.
[6]SUAREZ F F,UTTERBACK J M.Dominant designs and the survival of firms[J].Strategic management journal.1995,16(6):415-30.
[7]魏下海,董志强,刘愿.政治关系,制度环境与劳动收入份额——基于全国民营企业调查数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2013(5):35-46.
[8]樊纲,王小鲁,朱恒鹏,中国市场化指数[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2011.
[9]邓路,谢志华,李思飞.民间金融、制度环境与地区经济增长[J].管理世界,2014(3):31-40,187. |
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 0 
