美国“中国行动计划”对中国新兴技术国际科研合作的影响——以合成生物学领域为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (6195 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Since the end of 2018,scientific cooperation in emerging technologies between China and the United States has faced significant challenges.Quantifying the impact of political conflicts on scientific cooperation can help China's international cooperation in emerging technologies address international challenges.This paper empirically examines the impact of this external shock on China's international scientific research cooperation in emerging technologies based on the data of international scientific research cooperation in synthetic biology between 2009 and 2023,and empirically analyzes the effects of this policy through interviews and quasi-natural experiments constructed by the U.S.“China Action Plan”.The study also analyzes the mechanism behind the policy through interviews.The study finds that the direct impact of the“China Action Plan”on the number of collaborative papers between China and the United States is relatively limited,but it significantly reduces the academic quality and impact of the collaborative papers between China and the United States.The mechanism analysis shows that the“China Action Plan”reduces the academic quality of collaborative papers by restricting US-China cooperation in emerging technologies,and reduces the academic impact of collaborative papers by changing the overall environment of international cooperation.

Key words： International research cooperation Emerging technology area China Action Plan Synthetic biology

Received: 19 September 2024

PACS:	Q81
	G353.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Liu Qian
	Guan Jiao
	Liu Hongxu
	Hu Guangyuan

Cite this article:

Liu Qian,Guan Jiao,Liu Hongxu, et al. The Impact of the U.S.“China Action Plan”on China's International Research Collaboration in Emerging Technologies: An Example from the Field of Synthetic Biology[J]. , 2025, 6(7): 179-188.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V6/I7/179

[1]ZHU Y,KIM D,YAN E,et al.Analyzing China's research collaboration with the United States in high-impact and high-technology research[J].Quantitative Science Studies,2021,2(1):363-375.
[2]OKAMURA K.A half-century of global collaboration in science and the“Shrinking World”[J].Quantitative Science Studies,2023,4(4):938-959.
[3]GUTERMAN L.Verdict in China initiative case[J].Science,2022,376(6594):676.
[4]LIU S L,SU L,LUO K,et al.US“China initiatives”promote racial bias[J].Science,2023,380(6647):804-804.
[5]LESTER R,TSAI L,BERGER S,et al.Managing United States-China university relations and risks[J].Science,2023,380(6642):246-248.
[6]WAGNER C S,CAI X.Changes in co-publication patterns among China,the European Union(28)and the United States of America,2016—2021[J].Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2202.00453,2022.
[7]JIA R,ROBERTS M E,WANG Y,et al.The impact of US-China tensions on US science:Evidence from the NIH investigations[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2024,121(19):e2301436121.
[8]XIE Y,LIN X,LI J,et al.Caught in the crossfire:Fears of Chinese-American scientists[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2023,120(27):e2216248120.
[9]杜立,王萌.合成生物学技术制造食品的商业化法律规范[J].合成生物学,2020,1(5):593.
[10]丁迪.两用生物技术问题的治理挑战[J].现代国际关系,2022(9):18-25,59.
[11]HEIDARI R,SHAW D M,ELGER B S.CRISPR and the rebirth of synthetic biology[J].Science and engineering ethics,2017,23: 351-363.
[12]科睿唯安.2023中国国际科技合作现状报告[EB/OL].(2023-04-07)[2024-06-01].https://dwv.cn/K4vNrG.
[13]WANG Q,ZHANG M,LI R.Does COVID-19 reduce international cooperation in supply chain research between the US and China?[J].Benchmarking: An International Journal,2023,30(3): 697-712.
[14]SILVER A,TOLLEFSON J,GIBNEY E.Science embroiled in China-US tensions[J].Nature,2019,568(7753): 443-444.
[15]KEOHANE R O.After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy[M].New Jersey:Princeton university press,2005.
[16]TANG L.Halt the ongoing decoupling and reboot US-China scientific collaboration[J].Journal of Informetrics,2024,18(2): 101521.
[17]SILVER A,NOORDEN R,SUBBARAMAN N.US crackdown harms chinese collaborations[J].Nature,2020,583(7816): 341-342.
[18]李晓燕.从“合作”到“和谐”:国际制度的作用趋向[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004(6):126-129.
[19]宋勉,张仕荣.基于新自由制度主义理论的国际制度失效研究[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版),2022(3):61-67.
[20]武学超.英国学术研究卓越的生成逻辑与启示[J].中国高教研究,2012(6):22-26.
[21]GAO J,SU C,WANG H,et al.Research fund evaluation based on academic publication output analysis:The case of Chinese research fund evaluation[J].Scientometrics,2019,119:959-972.
[22]索传军,盖双双.基于引文的论文质量与影响力探析[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(5):11-15.
[23]李一杉,刘金松.教育实证研究改善了学术论文的质量和影响力吗？:以中国大陆教育学术研究领域为例[J].教育发展研究,2021,41(9):63-77.
[24]薛欣欣.我国高校教育学院学术竞争力比较研究:基于2018年16家高等教育研究最具影响力期刊的载文统计[J].中国高教研究,2019(9):94-100,108.
[25]龚凯乐,谢娟,成颖,等.引文国际化对论文被引的影响研究[J].图书情报知识,2020(2):102-112.
[26]宋志红,郭莹,李冬梅.国际合著提高了中国内地学者的科研产出吗:基于倾向得分分层法的实证研究[J].情报杂志,2018,37(4):80-85.
[27]孟凡蓉,郑烨,杨若愚.科技管理核心期刊论文被引频次影响因素:基于国内5本高被引期刊的实证研究[J].出版科学,2016,24(2):57-63.
[28]唐莉,SHAPIRA P,YOUTIE J.中国科研成果的引用增长是否存在“俱乐部效应”?[J].财经研究,2016,42(10):94-107.
[29]葛润,黄家林.大学扩招是否影响了结婚与生育?[J].经济学报,2020,7(3):168-201.