|
|
|
| Review and Prospect of Artificial Intelligence Governance Research in China |
| Dunshuai1, Chen Qiang2, Jia Ting3 |
1. Leading Science Teaching and Research Department of the Party School of the Shanghai Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China (Shanghai Administrative College),Shanghai 200233,China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China;
3. School of Economics and Management,Dali University,Dali 671000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Exploring how to mitigate the social risks brought by artificial intelligence through governance reform,and promoting the true realization of trustworthiness,controllability,and usability of artificial intelligence,has vivid contemporary value and strong practical significance for promoting the sustainable development of the digital society.Based on the perspective of scientific knowledge graph,this study uses Cite Space software to conduct bibliometric and visual analysis of research literature in the field of artificial intelligence governance in the CNKI database.The existing research overview,research hotspot evolution,and research topic evolution are deeply deconstructed,providing a comprehensive and complete theoretical view for subsequent research in the field of artificial intelligence governance.The research conclusion shows the followings.①Research on artificial intelligence governance has shown a rapid growth trend since 2018 and the future upward trend is still strong;②There is a strong correlation between research on artificial intelligence governance and the development level of the artificial intelligence industry;③There is a large group of scholars in the field of artificial intelligence governance research,but a core author group has not yet been formed;④The evolution of research hotspots and themes in artificial intelligence governance presents a basic logic and structure of “new technologies,new fields,new risks,new concepts,new applications,and new governance”;⑤The evolution of research on artificial intelligence governance is an extension and expansion from new technologies to new risks,and from new concepts to new governance.
|
|
Received: 11 June 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 王小芳,王磊. “技术利维坦”:人工智能嵌入社会治理的潜在风险与政府应对[J].电子政务,2019 (5):86-93.
[2] 中国信息通信研究院.全球数字经济白皮书 (2022年)[R].北京,2023.
[3] 霍金.Al可能成就或者终结人类文明[J].中国科技奖励,2017 (5):74-75.
[4] ELON Musk.Artificial inteligence is our bigest existential threat[EB/OL].htps://www.theguardian.com/tech-nology/2014/ct/27/elon-musk-artificialinteligence-ai-biggest-existential-threat.
[5] Microsoft's Bill Gates.lnsists Al is a threat[EB/OL]. (2017-08-14)http://www.bbc.com/news/31047780.
[6] 赫拉利.人类简史[M].北京:中信出版社,2014.
[7] GUIHOT M,MATHEW A F,SUZOR N P.Nudging robots:Innovative solutions to regulate artifcial inteligence[J].Vanderbit Joural of Entertainment and Technology Law,2017,20 (2):385-456.
[8] 贾开,蒋余浩.人工智能治理的三个基本问题:技术逻辑、风险挑战与公共政策选择[J].中国行政管理,2017 (10):40-45.
[9] 江怡.对人工智能与自我意识区别的概念分析[J].自然辩证法通讯,2019,41 (10):1-7.
[10] 李晓方.人工智能概念的再界定与政府的治理回应:基于技术、市场和政治视角的分析[J].电子政务,2019 (3):2-8.
[11] 张东冬.人类命运共同体理念下的全球人工智能治理:现实困局与中国方案[J]社会主义研究,2021 (6):164-172.
[12] 周江伟,赵瑜.人工智能治理原则的实践导向:可靠性、问责制与社会协同[J].治理研究,2023,39 (5):111-127,159-160.
[13] 徐继敏.生成式人工智能治理原则与法律策略[J].理论与改革,2023 (5):72-83.
[14] 庞祯敬,薛澜,梁正.人工智能治理:认知逻辑与范式超越[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2022,43 (9):3-18.
[15] 姜李丹,薛澜.我国新一代人工智能治理的时代挑战与范式变革[J].公共管理学报,2022,19 (2):1-11,164.
[16] 高奇琦.全球善智与全球合智:人工智能全球治理的未来[J].世界经济与政治,2019 (7):24-48,155-156.
[17] 高奇琦.智能革命与国家治理现代化初探[J].中国社会科学,2020 (7):81-102,205-206.
[18] 本清松,彭小兵.人工智能应用嵌入政府治理:实践、机制与风险架构——以杭州城市大脑为例[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2020 (3):29-42,125.
[19] 陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33 (2):242-253.
[20] 朱军文,李奕嬴.国外科技人才国际流动问题研究演进[J].科学学研究,2016,34 (5):697-703.
[21] 敦帅.新经济与新治理:分享经济中国之治的知识图谱研究[J].湖南社会科学,2023 (3):76-83.
[22] SMALL H,UPHAM P.Citation structure of an emeroing research area on the verde of applicationlu[J].Scientometrics,2009,79 (2):365-375.
[23] RITALA P,HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN P,NATTI S.Cordination in innovation-generating business networks:The case of Finnish Mobile TV development[J].Journal of Business&lndustrial Marketing,2012,27 (4):324-334.
[24] CHEN C.CiteSpace II:Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57 (3):359-377.
[25] 夏恩君,宋剑锋.开放式创新研究的演化路径和热点领域分析:基于科学知识图谱视角[J].科研管理,2015,36 (7):28-37.
[26] 张建军.国际互联网治理研究热点与前沿分析[J].电子政务,2019 (6):51-60.
[27] 姚雪,徐川平,李杰,等.基于普赖斯定律和二八定律及在线投稿系统构建某科技期刊核心作者用户库[J].编辑学报,2017,29 (1):64-66.
[28] 敦帅,陈强.中国企业可持续发展研究:态势演进与主题演化[J].科学管理研究,2020,38 (1):94-100.
[29] 解学梅,余生辉,吴永慧.国外创新生态系统研究热点与演进脉络:基于科学知识图谱视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41 (10):20-42.
[30] 杨东.监管科技:金融科技的监管挑战与维度建构[J].中国社会科学,2018 (5):69-91,205-206.
[31] 马长山.智能互联网时代的法律变革[J].法学研究,2018,40 (4):20-38.
[32] 孟天广.政府数字化转型的要素、机制与路径——兼论 “技术赋能”与 “技术赋权”的双向驱动[J].治理研究,2021,37 (1):5-14,2.
[33] 张文显.构建智能社会的法律秩序[J].东方法学,2020 (5):4-19.
[34] 崔靖梓.算法歧视挑战下平等权保护的危机与应对[J].法律科学 (西北政法大学学报),2019,37 (3):29-42.
[35] 何哲.通向人工智能时代——兼论美国人工智能战略方向及对中国人工智能战略的借鉴[J].电子政务,2016 (12):2-10.
[36] 郑智航.人工智能算法的伦理危机与法律规制[J].法律科学 (西北政法大学学报),2021,39 (1):14-26.
[37] 米加宁,章昌平,李大宇,等. “数字空间”政府及其研究纲领——第四次工业革命引致的政府形态变革[J].公共管理学报,2020,17 (1):1-17,168.
[38] 马费成,张勤.国内外知识管理研究热点:基于词频的统计分析[J].情报学报,2006 (2):23-30.
[39] 傅莹.人工智能的治理与国际合作. (2019-08-30).https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1643305983330134461&
wfr=spider&for=pc.
[40] 汤志伟.伦理先行:持续推进人工智能伦理治理[EB/OL]. (2023-10-25).https://theory.gmw.cn/2023-10/25/content_36918050.htm.
[41] 柳亦博.人工智能阴影下:政府大数据治理中的伦理困境[J].行政论坛,2018,25 (3):97-103.
[42] 郑戈.区块链与未来法治[J].东方法学,2018 (3):75-86.
[43] 余成峰.法律的 “死亡”:人工智能时代的法律功能危机[J].华东政法大学学报,2018,21 (2):5-20.
[44] 钭晓东.风险与控制:论生成式人工智能应用的个人信息保护[J].政法论丛,2023 (4):59-68.
[45] 薛泽林,孙荣.人工智能赋能超大城市精细化治理——应用逻辑、重要议题与未来突破[J].上海行政学院学报,2020,21 (2):55-62.
[46] 中华人民共和国国家互联网信息办公室.全球人工智能治理倡议[EB/OL]. (2023-10-18).http://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-10/18/c_1699291032884978.htm. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 6 
