中国人工智能伦理治理实践与挑战——基于三期交叠视角

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1064 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The ethical governance of AI in China is in a special period of“the overlap of three historical periods”,which are the period of rapid technological development,the period of pursuing high-quality development,and the period of deep adjustment of international order.Based on an examination of China's practices in AI ethical governance, the article argues that the intertwining of technological uncertainty,multi-objectives of economic and social development,and global strategic games have brought new challenges to the ethical governance of AI in China,particularly in the areas of impact identification,“no man's land”issues in AI ethical governance,and the effectiveness of the ethical governance system.Finally,some recommendations are made from the aspects of regulatory system construction,ethical review,ethical education,development of governance toolbox,and international cooperation.

Key words： AI Ethical governance The overlap of three historical periods

PACS:

G316

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhu Yina
	Lu Yangxu

Cite this article:

Zhu Yina,Lu Yangxu. Practice and Challenges of Ethical Governance of AI in China: A New Perspective[J]. , 2025, 6(1): 148-153.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V6/I1/148

[1] 卢阳旭,张文霞,何光喜,等.我国科技伦理治理的核心议题和重点领域[J].国家治理,2022(7):14-19.
[2] 联合国教科文组织.人工智能伦理问题建议书[R/OL].教科文组织官网,https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence.
[3] 吴逸菲,樊春良.中国语境下人工智能伦理治理的路径塑造:基于价值-工具二维理性的融合框架[J/OL].科学学研究:1-23[2024-05-17] .https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20240306.001.
[4] 于雪.人工智能伦理治理的实验方法论探究[J].科学学研究,2024,42(9):1793-1799,1807.
[5] 俞鼎,李正风.生成式人工智能社会实验的伦理问题及治理[J].科学学研究,2024,42(1):3-9.
[6] 瞿晶晶,王迎春,赵延东.人工智能社会实验:伦理规范与运行机制[J].中国软科学,2022(11):74-82.
[7] 王彦雨,李正风,高芳.欧美人工智能治理模式比较研究[J].科学学研究,2024,42(3):460-468,491.
[8] 卢阳旭,何光喜.我国人工智能治理面临的机遇和挑战:基于科技公共治理视角[J].行政管理改革,2019(8):29-36.
[9] JI J,QIU T,CHEN B,et al.AI alignment:a comprehensive survey[R/OL].https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19852.
[10] 阿里巴巴,中国电子技术标准化研究院.生成式人工智能治理与实践白皮书[R].2023.
[11] 联合国大会.加强人工智能能力建设国际合作决议[R].2024.
[12] JANBEN R,KESLER R,KUMMER M,et al.GDPR and the lost generation of innovative APPs[R/OL].NBER Working Paper,https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30028/w30028.pdf.
[13] 薛澜,赵静.人工智能国际治理:基于技术特性与议题属性的分析[J/OL].国际经济评论,1-18[2024-07-23] .http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3799.F.20240913.1043.050.html.
[14] 朱依娜,何光喜.信任能降低公众对人工智能技术的风险感知吗?[J].科学学研究,2021,39(10):1748-1757,1849.
[15] SHAUGHNESSY M R,SCHIFF D S,VARSHNEY L R,et al.What governs attitudes toward artificial intelligence adoption and governance?[J].Science and Public Policy,2023,50(2):161-176.
[16] 王奋宇,卢阳旭,何光喜.对我国科技公共治理问题的若干思考[J].中国软科学,2015(1):1-13.
[17] Stanford University HAI. AI index report 2024[R/OL].https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/HAI_2024_AI-Index-Report.pdf.
[18] 卢阳旭.加强人工智能伦理治理需“软硬兼施”[N].科技日报,2024-07-22(8).