基于试探性策略的新兴科技伦理治理路径探究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (12)

Download: PDF (1060 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract It has become a consensus that the benign development of emerging science and technology urgently needs the framework support of ethical governance.At present,there are three concerns in the construction of science and technology ethical governance system:risk governance,agile governance and global governance.The analysis of these three concerns shows that there are still some practical problems such as insufficient emergency capacity,low governance efficiency,and global cooperation to be strengthened.The tentative strategies of ethical governance of science and technology is helpful to solve these practical problems.The tentative strategy is characterized by cautious,dynamic,flexible and progressive approach to the problem,including top-bottom and bottom-up governance methods,paying special attention to the warning,feedback and adjustment of the strategy to seek the best results,and its governance process is more suitable for the“upstream”stage of the development of emerging science and technology.As a response to uncertainty,tentative strategies can help improve the ethical governance system of science and technology.However,its strategy itself has some problems,so it needs practical wisdom such as balancing flexibility and stability,taking into account temporary and long-term,coordinating localization and globalization.

Key words： Ethical governance of S&T Tentative strategy Agile governance Global governance Practical wisdom

Received: 06 August 2024

PACS:

G301

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Yu Xue
	Wang Qian

Cite this article:

Yu Xue,Wang Qian. An Exploration on the Ethical Governance Pathways of Emerging Science and Technology Based on Tentative Strategies[J]. , 2025, 6(1): 140-147.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V6/I1/140

[1] RENN O,KLINKE A,VAN ASSELT M.Coping with complexity,uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance:a synthesis[J].Ambio,2011,40(2):231-246.
[2] ROSA E,RENN O,MCCRIGHT A.The risk society:social theory and governance[M].PA:Temple University Press,2014.
[3] WBGU(German Advisory Council on Global Change).World in transition:strategies for managing global environmental risks[R].Heidelberg:Springer,2000.
[4] ANSELL C,TORFING J.Handbook on theories of governance[M].Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing,2022.
[5] MERGEL I,GANAPATI S,WHITFORD A B.Agile:a new way of governing[J].Public Administration Review,2021,81(1):161-165.
[6] 陈万球.科技伦理敏捷治理的三重维度[N].光明日报,2023-09-18(15).
[7] LUNA A J H O,KRUCHTEN P,PEDROSA M L G E,et al.State of the art of agile governance:a systematic review[J].International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology,2014,6(5):121-141.
[8] ERMAN E,FURENDAL M.The global governance of artificial intelligence:some normative concerns[J].Moral Philosophy and Politics,2022,9(2):267-291.
[9] GREELY H T.Governing emerging technologies:looking forward with horizon scanning and looking back with technology audits[J].Global Public Policy and Governance,2022,2(3):266-282.
[10] PFOTENHAUER S,LAURENT B,PAPAGEORGIOU K,et al.The politics of scaling[J].Social Studies of Science,2022,52(1):3-34.
[11] AFROOGH S,ESMALIAN A,MOSTAFAVI A,et al.Tracing app technology:an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-19[J].Ethics and Information Technology,2022,24(30):1-15.
[12] CHANDLER D.Resilience:the governance of complexity[M].London:Routledge,2014.
[13] BRUNEAU M,CHANG S E,EGUCHI R T,et al.A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J].Earthquake Spectra,2003,19(4):733-752.
[14] ROCO M C,BAINBRIDGE W S,TONN B,et al.Converging knowledge,technology and society:beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies[M].Chamber:Springer,2013.
[15] VEALE M,MATUS K,GORWA R.AI and global governance:modalities,rationales,tensions[J].Annual Review of Law and Social Science,2023,19(1):255-275.
[16] GREEN B.The smart enough city:putting technology in its place to reclaim our urban future[M].Cambridge:MIT Press,2019.
[17] ROCO M C.Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies[J].Journal of Nanoparticle Research,2008,10:11-29.
[18] KUHLMANN S,STEGMAIER P,KONRAD K.The tentative governance of emerging science and technology:a conceptual introduction[J].Research Policy,2019,48(5):1091-1097.
[19] 李冲,李霞.人工智能风险的试探性治理:概念框架与案例解析[J].中国软科学,2024(4):91-101.
[20] FISHER E.Governing with ambivalence:the tentative origins of socio-technical integration[J].Research Policy,2019,48(5):1138-1149.
[21] STILGOE J,LOCK S J,WILSDON J.Why should we promote public engagement with science?[J].Public Understanding of Science,2014,23(1):4-15.
[22] LYALL C,TAIT J.Beyond the limits to governance:new rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences[J].Research Policy,2019,48(5):1128-1137.
[23] Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Emerging biotechnologies:technology,choice and the public good[R].London,2012.
[24] Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Biofuels:ethical issues[R].London,2011.
[25] MORLEY J,COWLS J,TADDEO M,et al.Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps[J].Nature,2020(582):29-31.
[26] 于雪.人工智能伦理治理的实验方法论探究[J].科学学研究,2024,42(9):1793-1799,1807.
[27] BUDDE B,KONRAD K.Tentative governing of fuel cell innovation in a dynamic network of expectations[J].Research Policy,2019,48(5):1098-1112.
[28] 刘益东.致毁知识增长与科技伦理失灵:高科技面临的巨大挑战与机遇[J].中国科技论坛,2019(2):1-3.
[29] HOPSTER J.What are socially disruptive technologies?[J].Technology in Society,2021(67):1-8.
[30] VAN DE POEL I,HERMANN J,HOPSTER J,et al.Ethics of socially disruptive technologies:an introduction[M].Cambridge:Open Book Publishers,2023.
[31] 王爽,张新庆,郑小兰,等.伦理倾销行为及其诱因与规避策略[J].中国科技论坛,2022(4):137-145.