|
|
|
| Scientific and Technological Innovation Due Diligence Exemption Mechanism: Certification,Problems and Approaches |
| Lu Zhou, Gao Limin |
| School of Humanities and Law,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066044,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As an important institutional innovation in the field of science and technology,the mechanism of due diligence exemption for science and technology innovation contains the value concept of tolerance for the good and the beautiful,coupled with the policy text to provide protection to achieve the effectiveness of the system,which is able to safeguard the human dignity of the main body of innovation.However,in the value perspective of mechanism construction,there are cognitive biases that diligence is not as good as passive avoidance of responsibility,disclaimer and accountability reversal,and disclaimer mechanism has no room for development.At the fact level,there are insufficient supply of policy texts,and factors such as subject and object of policy implementation and mode of action affect the implementation of the mechanism.In order to promote the implementation of the mechanism,we should start from the value and fact levels respectively.We should not only enhance the value guidance,strengthen the responsibility,advocate the coordinated development of strict accountability and due diligence and exemption,but also pay attention to properly handling the inter-subject relationship in the implementation of policies on the basis of improving concrete and procedural norms,so as to ensure the effective connection between trial and error tolerance and error correction.And pay attention to the use of digital means to make due diligence to play a role.
|
|
Received: 30 October 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]苏竣.公共科技政策导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:9.
[2]SIMON H A.Behavioral model of rational choice[J].Economics,1955,69(1):99-118.
[3]陈朋.容错机制的建构逻辑及其效能提升[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,43(1):29-37.
[4]李宁宁,宋荣.对有限理性的哲学考察及其当代性反思[J].湖北社会科学,2022(12):101-107.
[5]张来武.科技创新驱动经济发展方式转变[J].中国软科学,2011(12):1-5.
[6]刘鑫.面向2035年原始创新的容错机制构建[J].中国科技论坛,2020(8):9-11.
[7]迈克尔·沃尔泽.论宽容[M].袁建华,译,上海:上海人民出版社,2000:10.
[8]陈根发.宽容是什么[J].云南大学学报(法学版),2006(3):1-6.
[9]李永刚.宽容:一种政治哲学的解读[J].开放时代,2006(5):92-101.
[10]王秀华,郭琦,陈泽文.科技创新容错机制:现实困境、概念界定与理论模型[J].中国科技论坛,2022(12):99-107.
[11]乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].何博闻,译.上海:译林出版社,2004:4.
[12]李谧.风险社会的伦理责任[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2019:101.
[13]胡杰.容错纠错机制的法理意蕴[J].法学,2017(3):165-172.
[14]郭创拓.科研项目治理现代化的法治进路[J].法学杂志,2023,44(5):110-124.
[15]STILGOE J,OWEN R,MACNAGHTEN P.Developing a framework for responsible innovation[J].Research Policy,2013,42(9):1568-1580.
[16]刘权.数字经济视域下包容审慎监管的法治逻辑[J].法学研究,2022,44(4):37-51.
[17]屠振宇.保障与指导:尽职免责改革的功能构造[J].行政法学研究,2023(3):86-97.
[18]郭剑鸣,肖颖映,张晓瑶.干部容错纠错机制的合理适用及其优化:理论维度与实践路径[J].政治学研究,2021(4):99-112,158.
[19]朱炳成.环境健康风险预防原则的理论建构与制度展开[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,41(11):51-62.
[20]刘华,刘秀华,杨继文.数字社会建设中的科技治理问题及其法治保障路径[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(14):114-121.
[21]卢护锋.激励功能视域下的容错机制——法理解说与制度重构[J].行政论坛,2022,29(4):133-140.
[22]郭创拓.科研宽容制度改革法治化的困境及其破解之道[J].法学论坛,2020,35(6):67-74. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 5 
