|
|
Theory,Method and Paradigm of Science and Technology Think Tanks Research in China: Based on Systematic Literature Analysis |
Li Ming1, Hou Tiantian2 |
1. Institute of National Development and Security Studies,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China; 2. School of Humanities and Law,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China |
|
|
Abstract With the continuous deepening of research on science and technology think tanks in China,it is necessary to systematically review and reflect on relevant literature,in order to provide reference for more scientific and comprehensive research in the future.Based on the systematic literature review method,a 2W1H analysis framework for research on science and technology think tanks is constructed.The research literature on science and technology think tanks in China from 2010 to 2022 is systematically sorted and analyzed from three dimensions named as basic theory of science and technology think tank research,research methods of science and technology think tank research,and research paradigms of science and technology think tank research.Research has found that: (1)China's research on science and technology think tanks has developed rapidly,and the academic community has explored them from different perspectives.Relevant research has gradually progressed from shallow to deep,from the embryonic stage to the in-depth stage; (2)There are still problems in the research of science and technology think tanks in China,such as weak basic theoretical research,relatively poor and fragmented research methods,and insufficient reconstruction and innovation of research paradigms; (3)Promoting theoretical criticism and construction,expanding and improving methods,and enriching and innovating paradigms are the future directions for research in China's science and technology think tanks.This study provides a systematic analysis and rediscovery of research on technology think tanks at the theoretical,methodological,and paradigmatic levels,providing useful references for related research.
|
Received: 18 September 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1]ARSHED N.The origins of policy ideas:the importance of think tanks in the enterprise policy process in the UK[J].Journal of Business Research,2017(71):74-83. [2]栾瑞英,初景利.国外典型高水平科技智库运行机制剖析与启示[J].中国科技论坛,2017(11):174-179. [3]王桂侠,万劲波.科技智库影响力基本要素模型研究[J].科研管理,2016,37(8):146-152. [4]席亮,应验,贾宝余.中国特色新型科技智库建设研究:基于系统工程和科学传播等视角[J].中国科学院院刊,2023,38(2):333-341. [5]刘岩.我国省级科技情报机构服务科技智库的能力及策略研究[J].智库理论与实践,2022,7(1):88-97. [6]余玉龙.科技智库产品的传播途径、质量特征与保障策略[J].中国高校科技,2020(5):40-44. [7]袁永,康捷.科技决策智库影响力要素理论研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(11):99-103. [8]孙斐,叶烽.公众参与政府绩效管理的可持续性:一个系统性文献综述[J].行政论坛,2020,27(1):79-87. [9]哈罗德·拉斯韦尔.传播在社会中的结构与功能[M].何道宽,译.北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2012. [10]李华军,曹阳春,张光宇,等.颠覆性创新理论25年:国内研究的知识框架与未来展望[J].中国科技论坛,2021(11):1-11. [11]WHETTEN D A.What constitutes a theoretical contribution[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4):490-495. [12]孙志茹,张志强.科学思想库的组织与发展分析[J].情报资料工作,2010(2):34-37. [13]季婉婧,曲建升.国际典型科技智库的类型及其产品特点分析[J].图书与情报,2012(5):93-98. [14]贾品荣,伊彤.科技政策智库及其咨询服务能力研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(23):99-104. [15]王桂侠,万劲波.科技智库影响力基本要素模型研究[J].科研管理,2016,37(8):146-152. [16]鄢波,杜军,王许兵.科技创新智库构建与治理机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(16):29-37. [17]张凤,吴静,裴瑞敏.基于智库双螺旋法的科技前瞻研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(2):160-167. [18]王莉丽.智库公共外交:概念、功能、机制与模式[J].中国人民大学学报,2019,33(2):97-105. [19]崔玉军.中国智库的规模与建设取向[J].重庆社会科学,2014(7):108-119. [20]王子丹,袁永.基于国际经验的科技智库评价体系建设研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(12):70-75. [21]于升峰,肖强.科技智库战略决策平台构建研究[J].智库理论与实践,2020,5(1):22-27. [22]黄晓斌,张明鑫.新技术环境下的智库情报服务创新研究[J].图书与情报,2020(1):112-119. [23]刘琦岩.智库以知识管理引导社会治理路径探析[J].中国软科学,2016(6):154-158. [24]吴善超.着力塑造高质量新型科技智库[J].人民论坛,2023(9):59-63. [25]吕旭宁,肖尤丹.多理论视角下的科技智库管理和运行机制研究[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(8):28-34. [26]潘教峰.智库研究的双螺旋结构[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35(7):907-916. [27]袁永,康捷.科技决策智库影响力要素理论研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(11):99-103. [28]樊春良.科技决策咨询制度与智库建设[J].科学与社会,2017,7(3):79-93. [29]姜天文,胡炜.中国科技决策智库体系建设的国外经验与对策建议[J].科学管理研究,2020,38(6):34-38. [30]王舜淋,张向前.高校新型科技类智库发展战略与路径[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(5):97-104. [31]颜慧超,林洪,涂瑜,等.面向科技智库的科技创新政策监测体系构建研究[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(24):29-36. [32]于升峰.面向科技智库的知识图谱系统构建[J].智库理论与实践,2021,6(1):56-64. [33]孙华伟,王克平,张亚男,等.基于大数据思维的科技智库情报服务机制系统动力学仿真研究[J].情报理论与实践,2022,45(12):128-137. [34]许佳,程文渊,张慧.中国国防科技智库评价体系建设研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(S1):76-80. [35]党杨,杨印生.基于DEMATEL方法的农业智库发展的影响因素分析[J].现代情报,2019,39(11):113-120,136. [36]崔小委,李纯.科技智库的社会经济数据需求与实证分析[J].图书馆杂志,2019,38(4):82-90. [37]陈樱花,陈安.混合方法视角下的智库DIIS方法拓展:基于DAIU四阶段模型的分类研究[J].智库理论与实践,2021,6(5):14-23. [38]张再生,李鑫涛.属地新型智库对治理现代化的效能提升:理论逻辑与关联测评[J].中国行政管理,2019(3):63-72. [39]刘司可,杨述明,刘长林.影响世界一流高校智库建设的组织因素及创新启示:基于清晰集定性比较分析[J].科学管理研究,2022,40(5):46-54. [40]潘教峰.智库双螺旋法理论[M].北京:科学出版社,2022. [41]李倩倩,刘怡君,马宁,等.基于智库双螺旋法的舆情治理与智库研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(6):773-782. [42]夏炎,张凤,潘教峰.基于智库双螺旋法的互联网时代就业问题研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(6):765-772. [43]张赤东,宋大伟,潘教峰.基于智库双螺旋法的区域创新环境评价研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(6):745-755. [44]于旭,项亚男.科技智库动态知识服务能力体系研究[J].情报科学,2022,40(4):64-70,89. [45]王子丹,袁永.基于国际经验的科技智库评价体系建设研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(12):70-75. [46]王柏村,陈磊,延建林,等.科技智库助力抗击新冠肺炎疫情的进展、启示与建议[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(16):260-266. [47]索玮岚,郭琨,孙晓蕾,等.基于智库双螺旋法的秦创原科技创新发展指数研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(6):736-744. |
|
|
|