|
|
|
| Global Organized Research in Large-Scale Scientific Engineering from the Perspective of Global Public Goods |
| Su Ming1, Li Wei1, Liu Yangxi2 |
1. Higher Education Research Institute,Shantou University,Shantou 515063,China;
2. Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The big science project is a fundamental research project in the field of big science.The political logic is the main rationale for national investment in the construction of big science project.By leveraging the pioneering and risk assessment functions of basic research,the pure scientific value is incorporated into the political logic.As big science project is essentially global public products with non-competitive and non-exclusive characteristics,there are challenges of free riding and insufficient supply of global public products from both advanced and latecomer countries.Big science project can provide positive effects in high-end manufacturing,scientific research,talent cultivation,image building,regional balance,and legitimacy enhancement.With the improvement of our country's comprehensive national strength,it is necessary for China to promote the construction of a national collaborative innovation system through big science projects,under the premise of risk prevention and control.In order to achieve the sustained and high-quality development of global collaborative big science projects,it is necessary to promote the transformation of big science projects from political logic to scientific logic,internationalize the responsibility for collaborative big science projects,innovate the global funding mechanism for big science projects,and selectively incentivize the organized scientific research of global big science projects.
|
|
Received: 05 September 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]国务院.国务院关于全面加强基础科学研究的若干意见[EB/OL].[2018-01-31].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-01/31/content_5262539.htm.
[2]科技部.科技部、发展改革委、教育部、中科院、自然科学基金委关于印发《加强“从0到1”基础研究工作方案》的通知[EB/OL].[2020-03-03].https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2020/202003/t20200303_152074.html.
[3]李侠,李格菲.大科学工程建设面临的双重危机[J].中国科技论坛,2018(10):16-22.
[4]李增刚.全球公共产品:定义、分类及其供给[J].经济评论,2006(1):131-140,147.
[5]杨娜.全球公共产品的属性探讨——兼论中国推动新冠疫苗成为全球公共产品的挑战及路径[J].国际政治研究,2022,43(4):5,9-30.
[6]王续琨,张春博.试论大科学工程的基本特征和社会功能[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(4):1-8.
[7]李建明,曾华锋.“大科学工程”的语义结构分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(11):1607-1612.
[8]路风,何鹏宇.举国体制与重大突破——以特殊机构执行和完成重大任务的历史经验及启示[J].管理世界,2021,37(7):1-18.
[9]王学谦,蔡仲.超导超级对撞机兴衰的政治语境[J].科学技术哲学研究,2021,38(5):107-114.
[10]王作跃.在卫星的阴影下:美国总统科学顾问委员会与冷战中的美国[M].安金辉,洪帆,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[11]罗伯特·吉尔平.国际关系政治经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
[12]何祚庥.对中国是否要建大型对撞机的几点意见[J].科学文化评论,2017,14(1):95-101.
[13]王贻芳.中国今天应该建造大型对撞机[J].科学文化评论,2016,13(5):20-27.
[14]OSTROM E.A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action[J].American Political Science Review,1998(92):1-22.
[15]苏明,陈·巴特尔.数据驱动下的人工智能知识生产[J].中国科技论坛,2021(11):51-56.
[16]安德森.我为什么反对超导超级对撞机[J].科学文化评论,2016,13(5):31-33.
[17]赵致真.世界最大的“科学废墟”[EB/OL].[2019-10-18].http://news.sciencenet.cn/sbht-113mlnews/2019/3/344292.shtm?id=344292.
[18]苏明.高校有组织科研合法性的形成与协调[J].高等工程教育研究,2023(2):110-115.
[29]苏珊·科岑斯,郝刘祥,袁江洋.二十一世纪科学:自主与责任[J].科学文化评论,2005(5):50-64.
[20]张庭伟.从“向权力讲授真理”到“参与决策权力”——当前美国规划理论界的一个动向:“联络性规划”[J].城市规划,1999(6):32-35,63.
[21]申明民.“搭便车”问题在政治解释中的应用及其局限[J].开放时代,2001(10):31-42.
[22]李增刚.全球公共产品:定义、分类及其供给[J].经济评论,2006(1):131-140,147.
[23]吴志成,李金潼.国际公共产品供给的中国视角与实践[J].政治学研究,2014(5):111-124.
[24]普莱斯.大科学小科学[M].北京:世界科学出版社,1982. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 5 
