|
|
|
| The Impact of the Tenure Track System Reform on Faculty Research Performance from the Perspective of Technological Innovation |
| Nie Yingyu1, Guo Hengliang2, Zhou Rui3 |
1. Institute of Natural Sciences,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China;
2. School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China;
3. School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on a panel data from 240 mathematics and physics faculty members at a research university between 2000 to 2021,a regression analysis using a multidimensional fixed-effects model was conducted to investigate the impact of the implementation of the tenure track system on faculty research performance.The study found that the implementation of the tenure-track system had a significant positive effect on the research performance of faculty in mathematical disciplines,and an even stronger positive effect on the research performance of faculty in physics disciplines.There was a significant positive correlation between job title and faculty research performance,and faculty members holding senior titles demonstrating significantly higher research output than those with associate or below titles.In contrast,age did not show any noticeable differences in its impact on research productivity.Faculty members under the tenure-track system overall outperformed those outside the system in terms of the number of national research projects and talent programs they led.In view of this,it is recommended to promote the effective and reasonable implementation of the tenure track system in universities by creating a benign ecology for the implementation of tenure-track system,establishing scientific evaluation and promotion criteria and improving relevant supporting measures,so as to effectively promote the cultivation of academic talents.
|
|
Received: 12 October 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]李璐.组织气氛对高校教师科研生产力的影响:基于中国28所公立高校的调查[J].教育学术月刊,2017,301(8):41-49.
[2]史万兵,杨慧.高等学校教师科研绩效评价方法研究[J].高教探索,2014(6):112-117.
[3]中共中央宣传部.数说发布[J].中国新闻发布(实务版),2022,7(7):41-58.
[4]尹木子.“预聘—长聘”制度会提升中国大学科研生产力吗:基于多期双重差分法的政策评估[J].高教探索,2020(6):18-27.
[5]ABRAMO G,D'ANGELO C A,DI COSTA F.The effects of gender,age and academic rank on research diversification[J].Scientometrics 2018,114(2):373-87.
[6]阎光才.学术生命周期与年龄作为政策的工具[J].北京大学教育评论,2016,14(4):15.
[7]朱佳妮,吴菡.一流大学建设高校海归教师科研表现自我评价的调查分析[J].高等教育研究,2018,286(12):55-60.
[8]戴智华.大学基础科研投入产出与教师背景特征关系实证研究——以上海交通大学一流学科建设为例[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(18):146-151.
[9]刘霄,阎凤桥.我国公立高校专任教师的学缘关系、聘任网络与科研生产[J].教育发展研究,2021,536(23):65-76.
[10]WANNER R A,LEWIS L S,GREGORIO D I.Research productivity in academia:a comparative study of the sciences,social sciences and humanities[J].Sociology of education,1981,54(4):238-53.
[11]JACOB B A,LEFGREN L.The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity[J].Journal of public economics,2011,95(9/10):1168-1177.
[12]张和平,沈红.薪酬水平对高校教师科研生产率的激励:基于“全国大学教师调查”的实证研究[J].现代教育管理,2019(7):84-91.
[13]阎光才,牛梦虎.学术活力与高校教师职业生涯发展的阶段性特征[J].高等教育研究,2014,236(10):29-37.
[14]顾剑秀,韩霜,罗英姿.研究型大学青年教师职业成长影响机制:人与环境匹配的中介作用[J].中国高教研究,2021,339(11):83-90.
[15]宗晓华,付呈祥.我国研究型大学科研绩效及其影响因素:基于教育部直属高校相关数据的实证分析[J].高校教育管理,2019,13(5):26-35.
[16]王思懿.我国研究型大学长聘制改革的制度逻辑与优化路径[J].重庆高教研究,2022,10(2):27-36.
[17]蔡连玉,张迅.我国高校“预聘-长聘制”绩效工具化及其治理研究[J].高教探索,2021(5):5-11.
[18]PIETILÄ M.Incentivising academics:experiences and expectations of the tenure track in Finland[J].Studies in higher education,2019,44(6):932-45.
[19]蔡金花,邱小艳.公立高等学校“准聘—长聘”制度的合法性研究[J].高教探索,2020(6):36-39,128.
[20]李连梅,姜林.中国大学“准聘—长聘”制度的缘起、困境与走向[J].现代教育管理,2021(7):105-111.
[21]徐晶晶,陈民伟,吕慈仙.“预聘-长聘”制对教师科研产出影响的实证研究——以S省7所高校的影响效应分析为例[J].中国高校科技,2022(8):45-50.
[22]任羽中,俞蕖,赵颖.“预聘-长聘制”对高校科研产出的影响机制与成效分析[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2020(4):41-52.
[23]杨希,李欢.聘任制改革下高校科研团队青年教师学术产出研究——对长聘与续聘考核政策效果的分析[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(23):129-137.
[24]BLAND C J,CENTER B A,FINSTAD D A,et al.The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions[J].Journal of higher education,2006,77(1):89-123.
[25]ALLEN M T,SWEENEY C A.Faculty research productivity under alternative appointment types:tenure vs non-tenure track[J].Managerial finance,2017,43(12):1348-1357.
[26]宋扬,吴若彤.职称晋升对大学教师绩效的影响:基于某大学教师数据的实证分析[J].世界经济文汇,2020,256(3):77-90.
[27]中国数学会.数学领域高质量科技期刊分级目录[EB/OL].(2021-07-06)[2022-09-20].http://www.cms.org.cn/index.php/Home/notices/notices_details/id/222.html.
[28]阎光才.学术生命周期与年龄作为政策的工具[J].北京大学教育评论,2016,14(4):124-138,188. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 4 
