服务机器人领域人工智能伦理风险评估方法的设计与实践

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (7777 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The application of artificial intelligence technology in the field of service robots will become an important means to relieve human labor pressure,reduce living costs,and make up for the shortage of manpower in the service industry,but the accompanying ethical risks cannot be ignored.This paper focuses on the ethical risk of artificial intelligence in the field of service robots.First,risk identification and risk source analysis are carried out,and then a set of general artificial intelligence ethical risk assessment methods are designed,and practice in service robots, which is an important application field of artificial intelligence technology.Finally,evaluated the five major ethical risks of artificial intelligence decision-making in the field of service robots,privacy violation risk,prejudice or discrimination risk,damage to fairness risk,unclear attribution of responsibility or improper risk,and analyzed the risk sources of each risk.Priority of risk sources for each risk,which solves the problem of“priority”judgment of different ethical risks,and thus verifies the applicability of the method.

Key words： Service robot Artificial intelligence ethical risk Risk identification Risk assessment

Received: 23 September 2022

PACS:

TP399

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Mengwei
	Xu Feng
	Yan Qi
	Li Fang
	Liu Xinyi

Cite this article:

Li Mengwei,Xu Feng,Yan Qi, et al. Design and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Ethical Risk Assessment Methods in the Field of Service Robots[J]. , 2023, 4(10): 74-84.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2023/V4/I10/74

[1]金周英.关于我国智能机器人发展的几点思考[J].机器人技术与应用,2001(4):5-7.
[2]嵇鹏程,沈惠平.服务机器人的现状及其发展趋势[J].常州大学学报(自然科学版),2010,22(2):73-78.
[3]鲁亚科斯,伊斯特费图尔斯.人机共生:当爱情、生活和战争都自动化了,人类该如何自处[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017.
[4]马丁·福特.机器人时代[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2015.
[5] RIEK D L,HOWARD D.A Code ofethics for the human-robot interaction profession[J].Proceedings of we robot,2014(12):256-288.
[6]赵志耘,徐峰,高芳,等.关于人工智能伦理风险的若干认识[J].中国软科学,2021(6):1-12.
[7]KÖRTNER T.Ethical challenges in the use of social service robots for elderly people[J].Zeitschrift für gerontologie und geriatrie,2016,49(4):303-307.
[8]林爱珺,刘运红.“算计情感”:社交机器人的伦理风险审视[J].新媒体与社会,2021(1):47-58.
[9]张善平.机器人道德问题探赜[J].科技展望,2017(14):284.
[10]周天策.服务机器人对女性“角色”替代的伦理风险分析[J].科学技术哲学研究,2017(6):65-70.
[11]王晓娣,方旭红.医疗机器人伦理风险探析[J].自然辩证法研究,2018,34(12):64-69.
[12]KIM W T,HAM W S,JEONG W.Failure and malfunction of da Vinci surgical systems during various robotic surgeries:experience from six departments at a single institute[J].Urology,2009,74(6):1234-1237.
[13] FUNG P.机器人能“杀死”性别歧视吗[J].中国企业家,2016(1):3.
[14]齐琳珲.新闻写作机器人性别偏见的个案研究[J].青年记者,2021(4):3.
[15]冯登国,张阳,张玉清.信息安全风险评估综述[J].通信学报,2004,25(7):10-18.
[16] Algorithm charter for Aotearoa New Zealand [EB/OL].(2020-07-28)[2022-11-28].https://www.data.govt.nz/toolkit/data-ethics/government-algorithm-transparency-and-accountability/algorithm-charter/.
[17]侯慧.应对灾变的电力安全风险评估与应急处置体系[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2009.
[18]邹敏.基于数据挖掘的电子商务产品质量风险评估技术研究[D].杭州:浙江理工大学,2016.
[19]尹铁燕,代金平.人工智能伦理的哲学意蕴、现实问题与治理进路[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(6):28-38.
[20]朱力宇,胡晓凡.联合国教科文组织《人工智能伦理问题建议书》的借鉴启示及其中国贡献:以人权保障为视角[J].人权研究,2022(4):47-64.
[21]许新芝,唐红禄.智能媒体语境下媒介伦理问题的思考[J].陕西广播电视大学学报,2019,21(4):84-87.
[22]李梦薇,高芳,徐峰.人工智能应用场景的成熟度评价研究[J].情报杂志,2022,41(12):176-183.
[23]李梦薇,徐峰,高芳.人工智能应用场景的界定与开发[J].中国科技论坛,2021(6):171-179.
[24]张兆翔,张吉豫,谭铁牛.人工智能伦理问题的现状分析与对策[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(11):1270-1277.