|
|
|
| The Public Security Paradox of Government Data Opening and Its Legal Countermeasures |
| Yao Zhifen, Wang Baoming |
| College of Law,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the era of big data,government data opening system is conducive to narrowing the information gap between the public and the government,breaking the information barriers between government departments,and optimizing the modernization of the national data governance system and capability.However,data opening is confronted with the risk of public privacy invasion,leakage of national security intelligence and dependence on data opening technology.Therefore,how to ensure that national security and social public security are not affected has become the biggest paradox of the current government data opening system while releasing the public value of data.Facts have proved that the legislative system of government data opening needs to be improved,the discretion of government data opening is not very clear,the protection mechanism of citizens'data rights is not yet sound,and the diversified governance mechanism of data opening is not mature,which are the main causes of the current public security paradox in China.On this basis,it is necessary to improve the legislative system,standardize the discretion of government data opening,improve the protection mechanism of citizens'data rights,and promote the diversified governance of government data opening.Only in this way can government data opening be integrated into the rule of law.
|
|
Received: 30 November 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]王人博,程燎原.法治论[M].桂林:广西大学出版社,2014.
[2]郑磊.开放政府数据研究:概念辨析、关键因素及其互动关系[J].中国行政管理,2015 (11):13-18.
[3]唐铁汉.提高政府公信力建设信用政府[J].中国行政管理,2005 (3):8-10.
[4]斯蒂芬·戈德史密斯,威廉·D·埃格斯.网络化治理:公共部门的新形态[M].孙迎春,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
[5]李涛.政府数据开放与公共数据治理:立法范畴、问题辨识和法治路径[J].法学论坛,2022 (5):65-73.
[6]征正,庄国波,陆晓燕.我国数据统一开放平台建设的障碍及对策研究[J].科技与经济,2016 (6):11-15.
[7]张新宝.我国个人信息保护法立法主要矛盾研讨[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2018,58 (5):45-56,204-205.
[8]庄荣文.营造良好数字生态[N].人民日报,2021-11-5 (9).
[9]许峰.地方政府数字化转型机理阐释:基于政务改革 “浙江经验”的分析[J].电子政务,2020 (10):2-19..
[10]ATTARD J,ORLANDI F,SCERRI S,et al.A systematic review of open government data initiatives[J].Government information quarterly,2015,32:399-418.
[11]黄如花,赖彤.数据生命周期视角下我国政府数据开放的障碍研究[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41 (2):7-13.
[12]SOLOVE D,CITRON D K.Risk and anxiety:a theory of data-breach harms[J].Texas law review,2018, (96)4:737.
[13]张涛.政府数据开放中个人信息保护的范式转变[J].现代法学,2022,44 (1)125-143.
[14]吴承义,唐笑虹.大数据时代国家安全情报面临的变革与挑战[J].情报杂志,2020,39 (6):1-6.
[15]赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人:发达工业社会意识形态研究[M].刘继,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006.
[16]侯东德,张可法.算法自动化决策的属性、场域与风险规制[J].学术研究,2022 (8):36-44,177.
[17]陈文博,杨姣.算法行政的扩张:制度逻辑与治理策略[J].新视野,2022 (4):69-75.
[18]王怀勇,邓若翰.算法行政:现实挑战与法律应对[J].行政法学研究,2022 (4):104-118.
[19]李支.数字经济环境下的个人数据权保护问题研究[J].肇庆学院学报,2021,42 (3):43-48.
[20]王保民,祁琦媛.新兴权利的行政立法保护[J].北京行政学院学报,2018 (2):1-9.
[21]SIMONSON J.Beyond body cameras:defending a robust right to record the police[J].Georgetown law journal,2016,104 (6):1559-1579.
[22]伯恩·魏德士.法理学[M].丁晓春,吴越,译.北京:法律出版社,2013.
[23]王真平.政府数据开放许可协议:理论源流、法律属性与法治进路[J].图书馆学研究,2021 (11):58-65.
[24]代佳欣.英美新三国政府开放数据用户参与的经验与启示[J].图书情报工作,2021,65 (6):23-31.
[25]陈尚龙.政府数据开放法律制度研究[D].北京:中国政法大学,2017.
[26]孙丽岩.政府数据开放范围裁量权的法律控制[J].法学家,2022 (5):44-57,192.
[27]杨严炎,苏和生.法理、功能与逻辑:检察机关提起政府信息公开公益诉讼之省思[J].河北法学,2022,40 (3):2-26.
[28]邢会强.政府数据开放的法律责任与救济机制[J].行政法学研究,2021 (4):41-54.
[29]孙光宁.大数据时代对司法审判的冲击及其应对——从指导性案例29号切入[J].湖北社会科学,2016 (5):150-157.
[30]陈征.公共任务与国家任务[J].学术交流,2010 (4):7-9.
[31]陈朝兵,郝文强.我国政府数据开放的力场模型与路径选择研究[J].图书情报知识,2020 (6):128-135.
[32]朱峥.政府数据开放的权利基础及其制度构建[J].电子政务,2020 (10):117-128.
[33]俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 4 
