科技评价政策转型背景下高科技人才科技创新活动特征及演进趋势

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2827 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The research takes the new academicians of The Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS)in 2021 as the research object,and counts the changes in the number of all academicians'papers,representative papers,papers with different authorship status from 2011 to 2020.We use Percentile in Subject Area(PSA),Category Normalized Citation Impact(CNCI)and other discipline standardization indicators to systematically analyze the characteristics and evolution trend of the paper output of high-tech talents in China,and explore the leading role of science and technology evaluation policy orientation on the science and technology innovation activities of high-tech talents in China,so as to provide decision-making reference for the further improvement of China's science and technology evaluation system.The results show that the number of CAS academicians published in foreign journals is 4.04 times of that in China.The number of representative papers in foreign journals is 22.45 times of that in China.Since 2016,the number of academicians'publications has increased significantly,and the proportion of domestic journal papers has continued to rise,especially the increase of the journal papers of“China Scientific and Technological Journal Excellence Action Plan”.According to the PSA ranking of papers at different levels,high-level papers are mainly published in foreign journals,and few in domestic journals.Academicians published 36.96% of their papers in domestic journals as the first author,and only 8.67% in foreign journals.Since 2016,the proportion of papers published as the first author has decreased significantly,especially in domestic journals.The conclusions of this paper are as follows.There is a large gap between the number of academicians published in domestic and foreign journals,but there is an obvious back flow trend in the number of academicians published in domestic journals.International authoritative journals are still the main platform for the academic exchange of high-tech talents,and the influence level of domestic journals needs to be further enhanced.With the improvement of academic status,high-tech talents are gradually shifting from executive positions to leadership positions in scientific research activities.

Key words： Science and technology evaluation Science and technology policy Scientific and technological innovation High-tech talent Academician of Chinese academy of sciences

Received: 26 April 2022

PACS:

G353.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Shen Xiaoman
	Liu Xueli
	Wang Yan

Cite this article:

Shen Xiaoman,Liu Xueli,Wang Yan. The Characteristics and Evolution Trend of High-Tech Talents'Innovation Activities Under the Background of Scientific and Technological Evaluation Policy Transformation[J]. , 2023, 4(7): 147-158.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2023/V4/I7/147

[1]中国科学技术协会.两院院士大会中国科协第十次全国代表大会在京召开[EB/OL].(2021-05-29)[2022-03-08].https://www.cast.org.cn/art/2021/5/29/art_107_157696.html.
[2]POKATOV D V.The Russian sociology of the political elite:Current trends in regional development[J].Tomsk state university journal,2020,453:116-123.
[3]CAO C.China’s scientific elite[J].China journal,1998,54(54):149.
[4]宋刚.钱学森开放复杂巨系统理论视角下的科技创新体系——以城市管理科技创新体系构建为例[J].科学管理研究,2009,27(6):1-6.
[5]蔡利超.广东科技创新绩效分析:基于2014—2018年广东SCI论文产出统计数据[J].广东科技,2019,28(12):37-42.
[6]李玉凤,杨芳.基于论文指标的宁夏科技创新主体创新能力评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(22):72-77.
[7]蔡承智,蒋杏子,李啸浪,等.高校师生自然科学领域科技创新能力分析——以高校A发表的核心期刊论文为例[J].产业与科技论坛,2019,18(21):77-78.
[8]YOON J W,PARK H W.Pattern and trend of scientific knowledge production in North Korea by a semantic network analysis of papers in journal titled technological innovation[J].Scientometrics,2020,124(2):1421-1438.
[9]邱均平,舒非.从冠状病毒防治研究看为什么要把论文写在祖国大地上[J].科学学研究,2020,38(3):397-398.
[10]ADORNI E E,MORDI C.Publication in foreign journals and promotion of academics in Nigeria[J].Learned publishing,2003,16(4):259-263.
[11]宋鸿.高水平学术论文外流问题应当引起重视[J].中国科技期刊研究,2005,16(5):736-739.
[12]刘彩娥.把论文写在祖国大地上:国内科研论文外流现象分析[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(2):64-71.
[13]魏玮,魏月华,扶文静.政策导向对科技期刊发展的影响[J].传媒论坛,2021,4(10):13-14.
[14]中国科学院2014年度工作会议.习近平在中国科学院考察时强调深化科技体制改革增强科技创新活力真正把创新驱动发展战略落到实处[EB/OL].(2013-07-17)[2022-03-08].http://www.cas.cn/zt/hyzt/2014ygzhy/ywhg/201401/t20140107_4012337.shtml.
[15]中国科学技术协会,教育部,国家新闻出版广电总局,中国科学院,中国工程院.关于准确把握科技期刊在学术评价中作用的若干意见[EB/OL].(2015-11-06)[2022-03-08].http://kexie.hust.edu.cn/info/1071/1818.htm.
[16]光明日报.如何办好中国科技期刊[N/OL].(2017-12-21)[2022-03-08].https://baijia hao.baidu.com/s?id=1587359992723325881&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[17]中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见[EB/OL].(2018-07-03)[2022-03-08].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
[18]教育部.关于政协十三届全国委员会第三次会议第2776号(教育类246号)提案答复的函[EB/OL].(2020-08-19)[2022-03-08].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/xxgk_jyta/jyta_jybxwzx/202008/t20200817_478448.html.
[19]刘雪立,申小曼,郭佳,等.论文被引频次学科领域百分位在创建期刊百分位数指标中的应用[J].中国科技期刊研究,2021,32(1):118-124.
[20]CLARK A.Five things you need to know about the journal citation indicator[EB/OL].(2021-07-10)[2022-03-08].https://www.letpub.com/Five-Things-You-Need-to-Know-About-the-Journal-Citation-Indicator.
[21]中国科协,中宣部,教育部,科技部.关于深化改革培育世界一流科技期刊的意见[EB/OL].(2019-08-16)[2022-03-08].https://www.cast.org.cn/art/2019/8/16/art_79_100359.html.
[22]胡清华,翟自洋,汪芳.利用学者代表作评价制度提升中文期刊学术影响力[J].科技与出版,2014(6):25-27.
[23]苏新宁,王东波.中国优秀学术论文急速外流的原因及应对策略[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,18(4):38-40,70,90.
[24]左菊.科研合著中署名顺序与作者贡献研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.