“放管结合”政策是否激发了民营企业创新活力

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (1090 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This paper tries to use the difference in difference model to empirically test the policy effect of “the combination of streamline administration and strengthen regulation”policy on private enterprises'innovative vitality.The research shows that “the combination of streamline administration and strengthen regulation”policy which focuses on reducing administrative approvals,lowering the entry threshold and optimizing the business environment effectively promotes the innovation vitality of private enterprises.The corresponding parallel trend hypothesis,propensity matching score and placebo test further validates the robustness of the model.From the perspective of influence mechanism,this policy can effectively motivate private enterprises' innovative vitality through the two-way path of improving innovation efficiency and the supervision of private enterprises' management functions.From the perspective of heterogeneous effect, “the combination of streamline administration and strengthen regulation”policy has heterogeneous effects on enterprises' innovation vitality with different life cycle and different political linkage.Based on this,this paper puts forward corresponding policy suggestions on how to deepen the administrative functions about the combination of streamline administration and strengthen regulation.

Key words： Combination of streamline administration and strengthen regulation Private enterprises' innovative vitality Policy evaluation Unconditional quantile treatment effect

Received: 24 December 2021

PACS:

F272.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Liu Wei
	Gao Lixiang

Cite this article:

Liu Wei,Gao Lixiang. Whether “the Combination of Streamline Administration and Strengthen Regulation”Policy Motivate Private Enterprises' Innovative Vitality or Not[J]. , 2022, 3(12): 150-158.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I12/150

[1]李军鹏.十九大后深化放管服改革的目标、任务与对策[J].行政论坛,2018 (2):11-16.
[2]张定安.关于深化 “放管服”改革工作的几点思考[J].行政管理改革,2016 (7):33-38.
[3]毕瑞峰,段龙飞. “放管服”改革背景下的地方政府事权承接研究——基于广东省中山市镇区的调查分析[J].中国行政管理,2018 (8):30-34.
[4]华生,蔡倩,汲铮.简政放权的边界及其优化[J].中国工业经济,2019 (2):5-22
[5]潘凌云,董竹.政绩竞争与企业产能利用率——因果识别、边界条件分析与机制检验[J].产业经济研究,2019 (5):103-114.
[6]王婧,蓝梦.混合所有制改革与国企创新效率——基于SNA视角的分析[J].统计研究,2019 (11):90-103.
[7]许和连,王海成.简政放权改革会改善企业出口绩效吗——基于出口退 (免)税审批权下放的准自然试验[J].经济研究,2018 (3):157-170.
[8]陈刚.管制与创业——来自中国的微观证据[J].管理世界,2015 (5):89-99.
[9]ZHU X.Mandate versus championship:vertical government intervention and diffusion of innovation in public services in authoritarian China[J].Public management review,2014,16 (1):117-139.
[10]程虹.管理提升了企业劳动生产率吗——来自中国企业-劳动力匹配调查的经验证据[J].管理世界,2018 (2):80-92.
[11]周建,李小青.董事会认知异质性对企业创新战略影响的实证研究[J].管理科学,2012 (6):1-12.
[12]COOPER D,PATEL P C,THATCHER S M.It depends:environmental context and the effects of faultlines on top management team performance[J].Organization science,2013, (25):632-652.
[13]廖福崇.审批制度改革优化了城市营商环境吗——基于民营企业家 “忙里又忙外”的实证分析[J].公共管理学报,2020 (1):47-58.
[14]POWELL D.Did the economic stimulus payments of 2008 reduce labor supply? Evidence from quantile panel data estimation[R].Rand corporation working papers WR-710-3,2014.
[15]李云鹤,李湛,唐松莲.企业生命周期,公司治理与公司资本配置效率[J].南开管理评论,2011 (3):110-121.
[16]罗党论,魏翥.政治关联与民营企业避税行为研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].南方经济,2012 (11):29-39.