职务科技成果混合所有制改革的实践成效及完善建议——基于四川省33家改革试点单位的实证分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (1198 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The reform of mixed-ownership of scientific and technological achievements is an important exploration to establish and adjust the incentive system which aims to promote the transformation of job-based scientific and technological achievements in the long term.Based on the analysis of the practical results of 33 pilot units in Sichuan Province,it is found that the new pilot units made some innovative system designs in ownership distribution,procedure refinement,and application of rules.Furthermore,the number of mixed-ownership achievements and transformations,the overall transformation rate of achievements have all increased.The social and economic benefits have been improved,and the enthusiasm of scientific researchers has been enhanced.However,mixed-ownership reform cannot solve all the problems,its universality and legality are still questioned in practice.The lack of conditions of guarantee and free trade in technology are also restricting the advancement of reform.Therefore,the mind should be changed in order to solve all the practical problems,it is more reasonable to establish and improve the diversified incentive system for the transformation of job-based achievements.It is also necessary to adjust the systematic rules and relative policies and provide guarantee conditions to ensure the rationality and long-term effectiveness of the incentive system.

Key words： Job-based scientific and technological achievement Mixed-ownership reform Practical effect Diversified incentive

Received: 30 March 2022

PACS:

DF523.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Xu Xingxiang
	Yu Shilin

Cite this article:

Xu Xingxiang,Yu Shilin. Practical Effects and Suggestions of the Mixed-Ownership Reform of Job-Based Scientific and Technological Achievements ——Empirical Analysis Based on 33 Reform Pilot Units in Sichuan Province[J]. , 2022, 3(12): 108-116.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I12/108

[1]郝佳佳,雷鸣,钟冲.高校职务科技成果权属混合所有制改革研究综述[J].中国科技论坛,2021 (4):128-139.
[2]陈家宏,饶世权.协同激励创造与转化的职务发明制度重构研究——兼论《专利法》第6条的修改[J].中国科技论坛,2019 (7):19-26,33.
[3]邓志红.高校职务科技成果的权利配置规则研究[J].科学学研究,2020,38 (2):259-265.
[4]章熙春,江海,袁传思.产权激励对促进高校科技成果转化的影响研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40 (17):106-111.
[5]武梅,钟荣芸,高德友,等.职务科技成果混合所有制的产权经济分析——基于巴泽尔产权理论[J].中国高校科技,2021 (4):88-91.
[6]沈健. “教授特权”政策适用性研究[J].科学学研究,2022,40 (1):37-46.
[7]赵雨菡,魏江,吴伟.高校科技成果转化的制度困境与规避思路[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,38 (4):108-112,116.
[8]黄灿,徐戈,李兰花,等.中国高校和科研院所科技成果转化制度改革——基于专利技术交易数据的分析[J].科技导报,2020,38 (24):92-102.
[9]孙理军,杨昌明,曹桂华.复杂技术创新过程的研究现状与展望[J].管理评论,2005 (12):12-17+32,63.
[10]黄鲁成,赵志华,傅晓阳.产品技术成熟度研究综述[J].科学管理研究,2010,28 (2):38-41,54.
[11]肖国华,詹文青,杨云秀,等.情报工程视角下四螺旋协同创新信息平台建设研究[J].情报科学,2020,38 (1):147-152,161.
[12]张宗任.职务发明的权利归属和报酬问题研究[J].知识产权,2014 (10):72-77.
[13]刘群彦,金隼,王玲,等.职务科技成果 “赋权试点”的实践与思考——以上海交通大学为例[J].中国高校科技,2021 (9):89-92.
[14]谢地.论职务科技成果权属限制问题与解决思路——以职务科技成果混合所有制实践为背景[J].电子知识产权,2021 (6):80-92.
[15]刘鑫,穆荣平.基层首创与央地互动:基于四川省职务科技成果权属政策试点的研究[J].中国行政管理,2020 (11):83-91.
[16]梁焱,胡洁.浅析关联方信息披露问题——基于上海家化信息披露违规案[J].会计之友 (中旬刊),2010 (3):78-79.