|
|
|
| Research on the Implementation Path of Granting Scientific and Technological Achievements Ownership or Long-Term Use Rights to Scientific Researchers |
| Kang Zhiping1, Fu Yuan2, Tang Xu3, Xiao Shuo1 |
1. Institute of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China;
2. School of Management Science and Real Estate,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China;
3. Institute of Scientific Research and Development,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The empowerment reform of job-related scientific and technological achievements is the current research hotspot and work difficulty in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.A large number of practical explorations have been carried out in academia and industry,but there are still a lack of empowerment reform implementation paths which can be copied and used for reference,which hinders the transformation of scientific and technological achievements and restricts the deep integration of technology and economy.Based on the analysis of international and domestic management mechanism and mode for scientific and technological achievements,this paper deeply analyzes the key issues of the current empowerment reforms such as the type of achievements,the purpose of empowerment,and the implementation of empowerment.It is oriented to promote the transformation of scientific and technological achievements,rather than simply considering the existence of ownership.This paper also proposes the implementation path and countermeasures of the empowerment reform of job-related scientific and technological achievements in terms of the form of empowerment,income incentives,decision-making management,and security services,providing an important reference for the current pilot work on the empowerment reform of the job-related scientific and technological achievements in China.
|
|
Received: 23 April 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]陈柏强,刘增猛,詹依宁.关于职务科技成果混合所有制的思考[J].中国高校科技,2017 (S2):130-132.
[2]王影航.高校职务科技成果混合所有制的困境与出路[J].法学评论,2020,38 (2):68-78.
[3]中华人民共和国中央人民政府.科技部等9部门印发 《赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权或长期使用权试点实施方案》的通知[EB/OL]. (2020-05-09)[2021-04-23].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-05/19/content_5512908.htm.
[4]李政刚.赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权的法律释义及实现路径[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37 (5):124-130.
[5]邓恒.理顺三大关系 推进职务科技成果赋权[N].科技日报,2021-01-08 (5).
[6]姚阳.高校职务科技成果混合所有制实践研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2018.
[7]曹爱红,王涵,王艳辉.职务科技成果所有权的法律归属研究[J].科技中国,2018 (5):71-77.
[8]钟卫,陈彦.政府如何促进大学科技成果转化:基于发达国家的经验总结[J].中国科技论坛,2019 (8):170-178.
[9]骆大进,王雪莹,常静.关于科技成果转化中成果权属问题的研究与思考[J].中国科技论坛,2019 (10):164-170.
[10]沈健. “教授特权”政策适用性研究[J/OL].科学学研究:1-11[2021-07-26].https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20210325.003.
[11]刘群彦.科技成果产权激励与科研人员成果转化行为的关系研究:基于高校及科研院所的实证分析[J].中国高校科技,2020 (Z1):120-124.
[12]何霁虹.高校科技成果转化的新思路——从 “拜杜规则”到发明人主义[J].中国高校科技,2019 (S1):103-106.
[13]唐素琴,曾心怡,卓柳俊.财政资助科技成果共有制与成果转化关系的考察[J].科技促进发展,2019 (9):935-942.
[14]吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析 (十四)——科研人员科技成果所有权探析[J].科技中国,2018 (7):28-36.
[15]KENNEY M,PATTON D.Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship? A six university comparison[J].Research policy,2011,40 (8):1100-1112.
[16]GEUNA A,ROSSI F.Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting[J].Research policy,2011,40 (8):1068-1076.
[17]马晓文,钟书华.美国研究型大学科技成果的收益分配机制研究[J].科技管理研究,2018,38 (17):66-71.
[18]翟晓舟.科技成果转化 “三权”的财产权利属性研究[J].江西社会科学,2019,39 (6):171-179. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 3 
