中国知识产权税收激励政策体系——演进路径、国际比较与优化对策

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1074 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The incentive effect and risk compensation function of tax incentives make it become an important policy tool for various countries to stimulate intellectual property activities.How to realize the effective incentive of intellectual property tax incentives for high-quality creation and application is the key issue that China's intellectual property taxation work at present.This paper selects the tax incentives directly or indirectly related to intellectual property activities in China from 1982 to 2021 as the object of analysis,and comprehensively analyzes the tax incentive policy system of intellectual property in China from the perspective of macro and micro.The evolution path is explored from a macro perspective,and the evolution background,driving factors and value orientation of the system are taken as the basis for stage division,so as to clarify the evolutionary logic and characteristics of the system stages.And then,the differences of design of intellectual property tax incentive policies in terms of R&D,achievement transformation and SMEs are compared between China and foreign countries in the structure and relevance of the system from microscopic perspective.Based on this analysis,this paper identifies problems of the existing system,then provides support and reference for the optimization of the tax incentive policy system of intellectual property in China.

Key words： Intellectual property Tax incentive policy Evolution of system Policy comparison and optimization

Received: 10 January 2022

PACS:

F240

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Deng Jie
	An Yunmeng

Cite this article:

Deng Jie,An Yunmeng. Tax Incentive Policy System of Intellectual Property in China: Evolution Path、International Comparison and Optimization Countermeasures[J]. , 2022, 3(12): 67-77.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I12/67

[1]孔粒,吴越.我国知识产权政策的宏观演变和央地耦合研究——基于文本分析方法[J].复旦学报 (自然科学版),2021,60 (2):145-156.
[2]胡超.知识产权税收激励机制的法经济学透视[J].税务研究,2011 (1):59-62.
[3]ATKINSON R D,ANDES S.Patent boxes:innovation in tax policy and tax policy for innovation[R].Washington D C:ITIF,2011.
[4]柳光强.税收优惠、财政补贴政策的激励效应分析——基于信息不对称理论视角的实证研究[J].管理世界,2016 (10):62-71.
[5]HALL B,VAN REENEN J.How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence[J].Research policy,2000,29 (4):449-469.
[6]ARROW K J.The economic implication of learning by doing[J].Review of economic studies,1962,29 (3):155-173.
[7]CAPPELEN A,RAKNERUD A,RYBALKA M.The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations[J].Research policy,2012,41 (2):334-345.
[8]张信东,贺亚楠,马小美.R&D税收优惠政策对企业创新产出的激励效果分析——基于国家级企业技术中心的研究[J].当代财经,2014 (11):35-45.
[9]IVUS O,JOSE M,SHARMA R.R&D tax credit and innovation:evidence from private firms in India[J].Research policy,2021,50 (1):104-128.
[10]SAKAR A Y.Innovation for a new tax incentive:patent box regime Turkey and the EU application[J].Procedia-social and behavioral sciences,2015,195:544-553.
[11]GAESSLER F,HALL B H,HARHOFF D.Should there be lower taxes on patent income[J].Research policy,2021,50 (1):104-129.
[12]曹越.知识产权税收激励制度发展特征与启示——基于BEPS行动计划前后专利盒制度的比较分析[J].中国科技论坛,2021 (5):118-125,167.
[13]孙莹.中国创新税收激励政策发展沿革及特征研究[J].科技管理研究,2015,35 (17):7-13.
[14]马玉新,吴爱萍,李华,等.中国企业技术创新政策演变过程——基于扎根理论与加权共词分析法[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39 (9):61-72.
[15]李维安,李浩波,李慧聪.创新激励还是税盾?——高新技术企业税收优惠研究[J].科研管理,2016,37 (11):61-70.
[16]任灿灿,郭泽光,田智文.研发费用加计扣除与企业全要素生产率[J].华东经济管理,2021,35 (5):119-128.
[17]刘晔,林陈聃.研发费用加计扣除政策与企业全要素生产率[J].科学学研究,2021,39 (10):1790-1802.
[18]财政部税务总局发展改革委工业和信息化部关于促进集成电路产业和软件产业高质量发展企业所得税政策的公告[EB/OL]. (2020-12-11)[2022-05-25].http://www.chinatax.gov.cn/chinatax/n362/c5159888/content.html.
[19]国家知识产权局2021年第一季度例行新闻发布会[EB/OL]. (2021-01-22)[2022-05-25].https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/col/col2521/index.html.
[20]薛薇.发达国家支持企业创新税收政策的特点及启示[J].经济纵横,2015 (5):106-110.
[21]张嘉怡.有效创新激励还是有害税收竞争?——BEPS背景下 “专利盒”政策的困境[J].中央财经大学学报,2015 (5):3-11.
[22]宋河发,廖奕驰.国外专利盒子政策与我国技术转让投资所得税政策比较研究[J].知识产权,2019 (2):81-88.
[23]匡小平,肖建华.典型创新型国家自主创新激励的财税政策[J].涉外税务,2007 (11):8-14.
[24]李平,李蕾蕾.基础研究对后发国家技术进步的影响——基于技术创新和技术引进的视角[J].科学学研究,2014,32 (5):677-686.
[25]梁正.从科技政策到科技与创新政策——创新驱动发展战略下的政策范式转型与思考[J].科学学研究,2017,35 (2):170-176.
[26]林毅夫,张维迎.政府的边界[M].北京:民主与建设出版社,2017.
[27]杨国超,刘静,廉鹏,等.减税激励、研发操纵与研发绩效[J].经济研究,2017 (8):110-122.
[28]刘凤朝,孙玉涛.中国科技政策向创新政策演变的过程、趋势与建议——基于中国289项创新政策的实证分析[J].中国软科学,2007 (5):34-42.
[29]郑烨,刘遥.政策引导对中小企业创新绩效的影响机理研究[J].科研管理,2021,42 (4):73-81.
[30]刘怡,侯思捷,严云扬.美国税改的国际税收解析[J].财政研究,2018 (5):99-106.
[31]凌兰兰,朱卫东.资本利得税经济效应研究:美国的经验与启示[J].税务研究,2008 (12):48-50.