基于循证决策理念的智库证据分级与决策路径建构

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (1645 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract With the rapid development of the informationalized society,the external environment of think tanks has undergone tremendous changes,and a large number of new interdisciplinary and cross-domain issues have challenged the traditional decision-making methods of think tanks.It is especially important to find the right decision path in a constantly changing environment.In order to provide theoretical support on the process fusion method(thind tank DIIS theory and method)from the perspective of evidence-based decision-making,this paper is inspired by the concept of evidence grading in evidence-based medicine,and puts the process of evidence-based policy making into the DIIS process and then puts forward a new path of think tank decision making.Finally,this paper uses a case to verify the rationality of this path.The case has proved that the decision-making path of think tanks based on the concept of evidence-based decision-making can optimize the decision-making process,and the output plan is scientific.

Key words： Evidence-based policy making DIIS method Evidence grading Decision path construction

Received: 03 March 2021

PACS:

C93-03

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Feng Jiahao
	Chen An

Cite this article:

Feng Jiahao,Chen An. Classification of the Evidence of Think Tank and Construction of Decision Path Based on Evidence-Based Policy Making[J]. , 2022, 3(5): 156-166.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I5/156

[1]HERTWIG R,BARRON G,WEBER E U,et al.Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice[J].Psychological science,2004,15(8):534-539.
[2]CAMERER C.Bounded rationality in individual decision making[J].Experimental economics,1998,1(2):163-183.
[3]SIMONH A.Theories of bounded rationality[J].Decision and organization,1972,1(1):161-176.
[4]TVERSKY A,KAHNEMAN D.Judgment under uncertainty:heuristics and biases[J].science,1974,185(4157):1124-1131.
[5]李永海.基于相似案例分析的决策方法与应用研究[D].沈阳:东北大学,2014.
[6]潘教峰,杨国梁,刘慧晖.智库DIIS三维理论模型[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(12):1366-1373.
[7]潘教峰,杨国梁,刘慧晖.科技评估DIIS方法[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(1):68-75.
[8]拜争刚.循证社会科学[M].上海:华东理工大学出版社,2019
[9]MACDONALD G.Promoting evidence-based practice in child protection[J].Clinical child psychology & psychiatry,1998(1):71-85.
[10]GAMBRILL E.Evidence-based practice:an alternative to authority-based practice[J].Families in society the journal of contemporary human services,1999(4):341-350.
[11]DAVIS L E,MIZRAHI T.Encyclopedia of social work[M].Oxford:NASW Press,Oxford University Press,2008.
[12]CHANG J,GUAN Z,CHI I,et al.Evidence-based practice in the health and social services in China:developments,strategies,and challenges[J].International journal of evidence-based healthcare,2014,12(1):17.
[13]PETROSINO A,TURPIN-PETROSINO C,HOLLIS-PEEL M E,et al.Scared straight and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency:a systematic review[J].Campbell systematic reviews,2013,9(1):1-55.
[14]许爱红.基于证据的教育及其对我国教育发展的启示[J].教育理论与实践,2011,31(25):16-19.
[15]张琦.遵循循证原则制订教育政策[J].中国教育学刊,2007(7):11-15.
[16]杨文登,叶浩生.缩短教育理论与实践的距离:基于循证教育学的视野[J].教育研究与实验,2010(3):11-17.
[17]SHOWLERD A,STEWART G B,SUTHERLAND W J,et al.What is the impact of public access on the breeding success of ground-nesting and cliff-nesting birds[J].Systematic review,2010,16:1-74.
[18]PULLIN A S,BANGPANM,DALRYMPLE S,et al.Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas[J].Environmental evidence,2013,2(1):1-41.
[19]Prime Minister and the Minister for the Cabinet Office.Command of Her Majesty[R].London:Modernizing Government.1999.
[20]WYATT A.Evidence based policy making:the view from a center[J].Public policy and administration,2002,17(3):12-28.
[21]HEINRICHC J.Evidence-based policy and performance management:challenges and prospects in two parallel movements[J].The American review of public administration,2007,37(3):255-277.
[22]李乐,周志忍.英国社会政策循证决策的理论与实践:对中国的启示[J].中国公共政策评论,2016,11(2):117-131.
[23]张克菊,韩毅.基于循证理念的科技情报工作研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(2):10-13,9.
[24]周志忍,李乐.循证决策:国际实践、理论渊源与学术定位[J].中国行政管理,2013(12):23-27+43..
[25]SANDERSON I.Making sense of what works:evidence based policy making as instrumental rationality[J].Public policy and administration,2002,17(3):61-75.
[26]徐宏宇.证据在科技决策中的应用研究[J].现代情报,2020,40(9):90-95.
[27]郁俊莉,姚清晨.从数据到证据:大数据时代政府循证决策机制构建研究[J].中国行政管理,2020(4):81-87.
[28]ATKINS D,ECCLES M,FLOTTORP S,et al.Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I:critical appraisal of existing approaches the grade working group[J].BMC health services research,2004,4(1):1-7.
[29]GUYATT G,OXMAN A D,AKL E,et al.GRADE指南:Ⅰ导论——GRADE证据概要表和结果总结表[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(4):437-445.
[30]陈耀龙,李幼平,杜亮,等.医学研究中证据分级和推荐强度的演进[J].中国循证医学杂志,2008(2):127-133.
[31]GRANDAGE K K,SLAWSON D C,SHAUGHNESSY A F.When less is more:a practical approach to searching for evidence-based answers[J].Journal of the medical library association,2002,90(3):298-304.
[32]SEGONE M.Bridging the gap:the role of monitoring and evaluation in evidence—based policy making[R].Geneva:UNICEF,2009.
[33]李幼平,刘雪梅.系统评价的起源、发展和作用[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(1):2-6.
[34]刘勤勤,唐俊,黄河浪.Meta分析法在医学实践中的应用[J].实用临床医学,2010,11(2):128-132.
[35]史耀疆,张林秀,常芳,等.教育精准扶贫中随机干预实验的中国实践与经验[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2020,38(8):1-67.
[36]潘教峰.智库DIIS理论方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2019.
[37]铁永波,唐川.城市灾害应急能力评价指标体系建构[J].城市问题,2005(6):78-81.
[38]杨青,田依林,宋英华.基于过程管理的城市灾害应急管理综合能力评价体系研究[J].中国行政管理,2007(3):103-106.
[39]谭小群,陈国华.政府跨区域突发事件应急管理能力评估研究[J].灾害学,2010,25(4):133-138.
[40]卢文刚.城市电力应急能力评价研究:基于政府主导社会参与的评价体系建构原则思想[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(11):139-141+134.
[41]陈安,冯佳昊.2018年中国31个省市区应急表现能力评价[J].科技导报,2019,37(16):30-37.