|
|
|
| Research on the Organizational Cooperation Network of the US “Oscar-Level Innovation”Awarded Organization ——Based on the R&D 100 Awards Data from 1979 to 2020 |
| Yang Chao1,2 |
1. School of Public Policy and Management,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China;
2. School of Safety Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the R&D 100 awards data from 1979 to 2020,this article discusses the evolution trend of the organization cooperation network of the “Oscar-level innovation”awarded organization in recent 40 years,focusing on the analysis of the public innovation cluster ecological model centered on the U.S.federal laboratory,and provides reference suggestions for the reform of social awards on science and technology and the reforms of scientific research institutions in China.It is found that the number of awards by American enterprise R&D institutions and government research institutions in recent 40 years shows a “central axisymmetric”relationship.The Oscar-level innovation awarded organizations in the United States are mainly government research institutions,and the most prominent is the public innovation cluster centered on federal laboratories.Even small laboratories have formed mature cooperative communities.The public innovation cluster has formed three cooperative ecosystems:the operation mode of “multi-government department funding and laboratory project zoning management”,the organization embedded trusteeship mode of “contract enterprise rotation trusteeship federal laboratory”and the enterprise collaborative trusteeship mode of “non-profit organization-university-Federal Laboratory”alliance reorganization.
|
|
Received: 05 August 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]CHEN I,HSU P,OFFICER M S,et al.The Oscar goes to…:high-tech firms' acquisitions in response to rivals' technology breakthroughs[J].Research policy,2020,49 (7):104078.
[2]杨帆.R&D 100创新奖——美国科技界的 “奥斯卡”奖[J].中国科技奖励,2007 (4):72-73.
[3]VERHOEVEN D,BAKKER J,VEUGELERS R.Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators[J].Research policy,2016,45 (3):707-723.
[4]FONTANA R,NUVOLARI A,SHIMIZU H,et al.Reassessing patent propensity:evidence from a dataset of R&D awards,1977—2004[J].Research policy,2013,42 (10):1780-1792.
[5]PROKOP V,HAJEK P,STEJSKAL J.Configuration paths to efficient national innovation ecosystems[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2021,168:120787.
[6]樊春良,樊天.国家创新系统观的产生与发展——思想演进与政策应用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41 (5):89-115.
[7]王志强,卓泽林,姜亚洲.大学在美国国家创新系统中主体地位的制度演进——基于创新过程的分析[J].教育研究,2015,36 (8):139-150.
[8]方圣楠,黄开胜,江永亨,等.美国国家实验室发展特点分析及其对国家创新体系的支撑[J].实验技术与管理,2021,38 (6):1-6.
[9]周艳,赵黎明.典型国家的创新体系比较研究[J].天津大学学报 (社会科学版),2020,22 (6):497-503.
[10]沈梓鑫.美国的颠覆性技术创新:基于创新型组织模式研究[J].福建师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2020 (1):91-100.
[11]刘笑,胡雯,常旭华.颠覆式创新视角下新型科研项目资助机制研究——以R35资助体系为例[J].经济体制改革,2021 (2):35-41.
[12]BLONDEL V D,GUILLAUME J,LAMBIOTTE R,et al.Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J].Journal of statistical mechanics:theory and experiment,2008 (10):10008-10020.
[13]Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory FY 2019 Annual Report:Science and Technology on a Mission[Z].U.S.Government Printing Office,2020. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 3 
