中美典型产业共性技术研究机构比较分析——以两个增材制造研究院为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (12)

Download: PDF (1171 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute (NAMII)was the first research institute under the framework of the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI),and was later renamed “America Makes”.It was an important measure of the Obama administration to promote the re-industrialization of the United States.Similarly,the National Innovation Institute of Additive Manufacturing in Xi'an,China is one of the first batch of national manufacturing innovation centers to be deployed in “Made in China 2025”.Through the comparative analysis of two national additive manufacturing innovation research institutes in China and the United States,this paper explores the governance characteristics of typical industrial generic technology research institutions in the two countries.It is found that there are some differences between the two institutes in terms of resource investment,institutional management,collaborative innovation and development model.

Key words： America Make National Institute Corporation of Additive Manufacturing Generic technology

Received: 27 May 2021

PACS:

F41

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Feng Yunhao
	Cao Di
	Wu Jinxi

Cite this article:

Feng Yunhao,Cao Di,Wu Jinxi. Comparative Study on Generic Technology Research Institutions in China and the United States ——Take Two Additive Manufacturing Research Institutes as Examples[J]. , 2022, 3(3): 166-175.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I3/166

[1]万勇,黄健.国外增材制造发展政策与研究进展概述[J].新材料产业,2016 (6):2-6.
[2]National Science and Technology Council.A National Strategic Plan for Advanced Manufacturing[R/OL].https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/iam_advancedmanufacturing_strategicplan_2012.pdf,2012-02-01/2020-03-20.
[3]CHU P Y,LIN Y L,HSIUNG H H,et al.Intellectual capital:an empirical study of ITRI[J].Technological forecasting & social change,2006,73 (7):886-902.
[4]胡文国.创建以工业技术研究院为核心的新型技术创新联盟——以深圳工研院科技创新和产业发展为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30 (3):197-199.
[5]ROBERTO M,RICHARD R N.Public research institutions and economic catch-up[J].Research policy,2007,36:1512-1528.
[6]汪晓光,夏青.国际产业共性技术研究科研机构的发展模式对我国的启示[J].机电产品开发与创新,2017 (6):1-2,15.
[7]BONACCORSI A,PICCALUGA A.A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships[J].R&D management,1994,24 (3):229-247.
[8]王守文,徐顽强,颜鹏.产业技术研究院绩效评价模型研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31 (17):120-125.
[9]吴秀洁,姚庆国.产业技术研究院绩效评价研究[J].现代商业,2017,33:108-110.
[10]吴金希.公立产业技术研究院与新兴工业化经济体技术能力跃迁——来自台湾工业技术研究院的经验[J].清华大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2014,29 (3):136-167.
[11]HU M C.Evolution of knowledge creation and diffusion:the revisit of Taiwan's Hsinchu science park[J].Scientometrics,2011,88:949-977.
[12]沈和.管理机制历史性变革引爆技术创新集群式突破——江苏省产业技术研究院的积极探索与启示[J].中国发展与观察,2018 (12):48-52.
[13]胡然,范欲晓,牛婧红,等.武汉市工业技术研究院体制机制研究[J].科技创业月刊,2018 (6):114-118.
[14]THRYFT A R.NAMII funds first projects[J].Design news,2013,68 (5):32-32.
[15]Society of Manufacturing Engineers.SME to play key role in national additive manufacturing innovation institute[EB/OL]. (2012-08-20)[2020-06-02].https://www.qualitydigest.com/print/21576 /.
[16]李方正,胡福文,马立敏,等. “美国造”的运行机制、最新动态及启示[J].工业技术创新,2018,5 (4):1-6.
[17]刘亚威.从 “美国造”看制造业再回归[N].中国航空报,2020-02-11 (11).
[18]张秋菊.美国增材制造创新研究所协同创新机制研究及启示[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2015,30 (4):66-71.
[19]冷单,王影. “中国制造”能向 “美国制造”学什么[J].中国经济周刊,2016 (3):79-80.
[20]赵纪元.面向国家重大需求突破行业技术瓶颈——国家增材制造创新中心建设实践与思考[J].中国工业和信息化,2018 (12):34-40.
[21]黄卫东.建设增材制造 (3D打印)技术的科技、教育与产业发展的系统工程[J].改革与开放,2014 (15):7-10.
[22]工业和信息化部.关于完善制造业创新体系,推进制造业创新中心建设的指导意见[J].机械工业标准化与质量,2016,521 (10):7-9.
[23]中国电子信息产业发展研究院.美国制造创新研究院解读[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2018.
[24]李纪珍.产业共性技术供给体系研究[D].北京:清华大学,2002.