|
|
|
| Optimize the Form of Personal Data Protection Rules Under Data Platforms ——From Soft Law Embedded in Hard Law |
| Bao Kun1,2 |
1. KoGuan School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China;
2. China Institute for Smart Court,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Personal data is an important factor of production under the data platform.To protect and keep the balance of interests in personal data is an essential issue in the digital economy.However,the tort liability law has some normative limitations.The protection of interest is subject to conflicting and weakened legal rules at the discretion of judges,and the protection of right suffers from technical limitations of legislation and high marginal costs of governance.To deal with them,technical standard as a kind of soft law plays a normative advantage in terms of the elementalization of the rules of obligation and the interest-oriented mechanism of restraint.Therefore we should take the international technical standard ISO/IEC 27701 as a soft law example to explore the way to transform the obligational rules and optimize the normative function in protection of personal data right.After analysis,we find it is still necessary to build a hard law environment for creation of technical soft law,connect the application of technical soft law in judicial trials,and promote the co-rule of hard and soft law in the protection of personal data rights in China.
|
|
Received: 20 May 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]科斯.企业、市场与法律[M].上海:上海三联书店,1990.
[2]中共中央 国务院关于构建更加完善的要素市场化配置体制机制的意见[EB/OL]. (2020-04-09)[2021-05-14].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-04/09/content_5500622.htm.
[3]梅宏.数据治理之论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2020.
[4]黄锫.大数据时代个人数据权属的配置规则[J].法学杂志,2021,42 (1):99-110.
[5]于飞.权利与利益区分保护的侵权法体系研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2012,8 (1):78.
[6]梅夏英.数据的法律属性及其民法定位[J].中国社会科学,2016 (9):151-162.
[7]罗斯科·庞德.法理学 (第四卷)[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[8]彭诚信.现代权利理论研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2017.
[9]孙山.民法上对象与客体的区分及其应用[J].河北法学,2021,39 (2):92-116.
[10]REIDENBERG J R.Lex informatica:the formulation of information policy rules through technology[J].Texas law review,1998,76 (3):553.
[11]张涛.大数据时代 “通过设计保护数据”的元规制[J].大连理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2021,42 (2):79-88.
[12]冯果,薛亦飒.从 “权利规范模式”走向 “行为控制模式”的数据信托——数据主体权利保护机制构建的另一种思路[J].法学评论,2020,38 (3):70-82.
[13]SUMNER L W,The moral foundation of right[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1987.
[14]熊继宁.系统法学导论[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2006.
[15]张民安.过错侵权责任制度研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版,2002.
[16]孙莹.大规模侵害个人信息高额罚款研究[J].中国法学,2020 (5):106-126.
[17]LANDES W M,POSNER R A.Positive economic theory of tort law[J].Georgia law review,1980,15:851.
[18]LANDES W M,POSNER R A.The economic structure of tort law[M].Cambridge:Havard University Press,1987.
[19]罗伯特·库特,托马斯·尤伦.法和经济学[M].上海:格致出版社,2010.
[20]冯·哈耶克.哈耶克论文集[M].北京:首都经济贸易出版社,2001.
[21]姜明安.软法的兴起与软法之治[J].中国法学,2006 (2):25-36.
[22]张圆.论技术标准的法律效力——以 《立法法》的法规范体系为参照[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (12):114-119.
[23]罗豪才.公共治理的崛起呼唤软法之治[J].政府法制,2009 (5):12-13.
[24]罗豪才,周强.软法研究的多维思考[J].中国法学,2013 (5):102-111.
[25]ISO/IEC 27701:2019 Security techniques-extension to ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 for privacy information management-requirements and guidelines[EB/OL]. (2020-12-11)[2021-05-16].https://www.iso.org/standard/71670.html.
[26]华为浏览器获BSI权威认证,多举措保护用户信息和隐私安全[EB/OL]. (2020-12-11)[2021-05-14]https://www.163.com/dy/article/FTJ3HI5H05310CAG.html.
[27]江必新.论软法效力 兼论法律效力之本源[J].中外法学,2011,23 (6):1163-1170.
[28]张菲菲.个人信息侵权归责实务问题研究[J].东南大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2020,22 (S2):71-75.
[29]胡群,刘文云.基于层次分析法的SWOT方法改进与实例分析[J].情报理论与实践,2009,32 (3):68-71.
[30]包建华,陈宝贵.技术标准在司法裁判中的适用方式[J].法律适用,2019 (13):121-128. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 3 
