|
|
Research on the Systematization of National Strategic Scientific and Technological Forces |
Xu Shibo1,2, Jia jingdun2, Zhong Weijun1 |
1. School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China; 2. Torch High-Tech Industry Development Center,Ministry of Science and Technology,Beijing 100045,China |
|
|
Abstract Driven by the era of big science and industrial change,countries all over the world attach great importance to strategic science and technology.Building a national strategic scientific and technological force is a major strategic deployment made by the Party Central Committee.In view of the fact that the national strategic scientific and technological forces are under construction,this paper starts with the analysis of the structural characteristics of the national strategic scientific and technological forces,deeply analyzes the theoretical logic of systematizing and promoting the strategic scientific and technological forces,and redivides the scientific research activities and institutions into eight categories with reference to the Stokes quadrant model.On this basis,drawing on the idea of “main battle main construction”in the national defense construction system,this paper constructs a matrix coupling network model of national strategic science and technology forces,and analyzes three network coordination coupling modes in the model,so as to provide theoretical reference for better promoting the layout of strategic science and technology forces.
|
Received: 07 May 2021
|
|
|
|
|
[1]马茹,王宏伟,罗晖.中国科技创新力量布局现状研究[J].科学管理研究,2019,37 (6):2-7. [2]肖小溪,代涛,李晓轩.美国国家实验室的改革动向及启示[J].中国科学院院刊,2016,31 (3):376-382. [3]肖小溪,李晓轩.关于国家战略科技力量概念及特征的研究[J].中国科技论坛,2021 (3):1-7. [4]BUSH V.Science:the endless frontier[R].Washington:National Science Foundation,1990:15-19. [5]谭文华,曾国屏.关于基础研究及其与国家目标关系的再思考[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004 (4):19-22. [6]STOKE S D.Pasteur's quadrant:basic science and technological innovation[M].Washington:Brookings Institution Press,1997. [7]约翰·齐曼。真科学[M].曾国屏,译.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002. [8]胡鞍钢.知识与发展:21世纪新追赶战略[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001. [9]PISANO G P.Science business:the promise,the reality,and the future of biotech[M].New York:Harvard Business Press,2006. [10]李天柱,银路,苗仁涛,等. “科学商业”与 “接力创新”研究——基于生物制药[J].科学学研究,2012 (12):1881-1890. [11]张庆芝,李慧聪,雷家骕.科学家参与学术创业的程度及对成果商业化的影响[J].技术经济与管理研究,2018 (3):55-58. [12]陈捷,肖小溪.美国科赫研究所开展融合科学的实践与启示[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35 (1):27-33. [13]陈套.推动科研范式升级 强化国家战略科技力量[J].中国科技奖励,2020 (8):67-68. [14]田喜腾,田甲乐.大科学时代政府在科学知识生产中的作用——基于国家实验室的分析[J].山东科技大学学报:社会科学版,2018 (1):9-15. [15]秦旭,王树恩.论大科学时代的科技战略[J].科学管理研究,2003 (3):24-27. [16]龙云安,胡能贵,陈国庆,等.培育我国国家战略科技力量建制化新优势研究[J].科学管理研究,2017 (2):18-21. [17]樊春良.科技举国体制的历史演变与未来发展趋势[J].国家治理,2020 (42):23-28. [18]张俊芳,雷家骕.国家创新体系研究:理论与政策并行[J].科研管理,2009,30 (4):10-17. [19]黄鲁成.宏观区域创新体系的理论模式研究[J].中国软科学,2002 (1):95-98. [20]胡凯,尹继东.区域创新体系的构成及作用机制研究[J].科技管理研究,2007 (7):99-101. [21]陈红喜,姜春,袁瑜,等.基于新巴斯德象限的新型研发机构科技成果转移转化模式研究——以江苏省产业技术研究院为例[J].科技进步与对策,2018 (6):36-45. [22]王一鸣.研发活动的产业视角:一种新的象限模型[J].中国软科学,2013 (1):72-80. [23]吕波,曹庆萍.美国与德国科技研发体系比较研究[J].中国科技论坛,2005 (1):135-139. [24]裴娜.从管理学角度看军事指挥体制改革[J].科学与财富,2016 (10):287-287. [25]许江风.总部管总、板块主建、战区主战 大型油企管控可借鉴军改[J].中国石油和化工,2018 (6):56-56. |
|
|
|