多元主体协同驱动下创新教育四螺旋模式研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (6222 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Innovative education is a process of interaction in many fields.The traditional “university-industry-government”triple helix is more based on economic interests,while the fourth helix adds “social public”based on the triple helix,forming a new balance between economic interests and social public interests,as well as a broader perspective.On this basis,in order to promote the development of innovative education,from the perspective of multi-agent collaborative driving,the quadruple helix model of innovative education is constructed,which is led by colleges and universities,supported by industry,supported by government and supervised by the public.The dynamic mechanism and collaborative mechanism of the model are elaborated,and the construction of an all-round innovative education system,optimization of the top-level design of innovative education,and joint innovation are proposed.There are four collaborative paths to optimize innovation practice and promote innovation sustainable development.

Key words： Multiple subject Innovative education Triple helix Quadruple helix

Received: 25 February 2021

PACS:

G301

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Xu Ligang
	Zhou Yiting
	Xu Meijuan

Cite this article:

Xu Ligang,Zhou Yiting,Xu Meijuan. Research on the Quadruple Helix Mode of Innovative Education Driven by Multi-subject Cooperation[J]. , 2021, (12): 134-141.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V/I12/134

[1]MU W J,TANG X Y,ZHOU X G.Science and technology innovation promotes realization of university education concept[J].The journal of China universities of posts and telecommunications,2006 (3):107-109.
[2]PARK H W.Transition from the triple helix to n-tuple helices? An interview with Elias G.Carayannis and David F.J.Campbell[J].Scientometrics,2014,99 (1):203-207.
[3]罗贤甲.协同创新视域下大学生创业教育的现实逻辑[J].思想教育研究,2018 (11):125-129.
[4]赵东霞,郭书男,周维.国外大学科技园 “官产学”协同创新模式比较研究——三螺旋理论的视角[J].中国高教研究,2016 (11):89-94.
[5]黄斌.三螺旋理论下创新创业教育研究[J].中国高校科技,2019 (11):69-72.
[6]CARAYANNIS E G,GRIGOROUDIS E,STAMATI D,et al.Social business model innovation:a quadruple/quintuple helix-based social innovation ecosystem[J].IEEE transactions on engineering management,2019 (99):1-14.
[7]HUGO B F,MARIBEL G,ERNESTO A J.Does triple helix collaboration matter for the early internationalisation of technology-based firms in emerging economies[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2021,163:120439.
[8]LEWONTIN R.The triple helix:gene,organism,and environment[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,2000.
[9]LLEYDESDORFF L,ETZKOWITZ H.The triple helix as a model for innovation studies[J].Science and public policy,1998,25 (3):195-203.
[10]ETZKOWITZ H,LLEYDESDORFF L.The dynamics of innovation:from national systems and “mode 2”to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations[J].Research policy,2000,29 (2):109-123.
[11]YOON J.The evolution of South Korea's innovation system:moving towards the triple helix model[J].Scientometrics:an international journal for all quantitative aspects of the science of science policy,2015,104 (1):265-293.
[12]吴卫红,陈高翔,张爱美. “政产学研用资”多元主体协同创新三三螺旋模式及机理[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (5):1-10.
[13]周春彦,亨利·埃茨科威兹.双三螺旋:创新与可持续发展[J].东北大学学报 (社会科学版),2006 (3):170-174.
[14]ARNKIL R,JARVENSIVU A,KOSKI P,et al.Exploring quadruple helix outlining user-oriented innovation models[J].Tampereen yliopisto,2010.
[15]CARAYANNIS E G,DAVID F J.CAMPBELL D F. “Mode 3”and “quadruple helix”:toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem[J].International journal of technology management,2009,46 (3/4):201-234.
[16]PRAINSACK B,CARAYANNIS E G,DAVID F J.et al,Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems:21^st century democracy,innovation,and entrepreneurship for development[J].Minerva,2012,50 (1):139-142.
[17]黄瑶,王铭. “三螺旋”到 “四螺旋”:知识生产模式的动力机制演变[J].教育发展研究,2018,38 (1):69-75.
[18]吴菲菲,童奕铭,黄鲁成.中国高技术产业创新生态系统有机性评价——创新四螺旋视角[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37 (5):67-76.
[19]杨晓斐,武学超. “四重螺旋”创新生态系统构建研究[J].中国高校科技,2019 (10):30-34.
[20]霍丽娟.基于知识生产新模式的产教融合创新生态系统构建研究[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2019 (10):38-44.
[21]王成军.社会创业——基于四重螺旋的捐赠大学研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2016.
[22]王成军.大学—产业—政府三重螺旋研究[J].中国科技论坛,2005 (1):90-94.
[23]ENGELBERT J,VAN ZOONEN L,HIRZALLA F.Excluding citizens from the european smart city:the discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2019 (142):347-353.
[24]王成军,方军.知识管理——基于四重螺旋的创新创业研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2020.
[25]许礼刚,袁梦洁,徐美娟.电子商务 “双创”型人才培养的双链模式研究[J].实验技术与管理,2021,38 (3):10-14+28.
[26]邹慧明.公众参与教育改革:可为、难为与应为[J].教育研究与实验,2020 (6):24-31.
[27]黄瑶,马永红,王铭.知识生产模式Ⅲ促进超学科快速发展的特征研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,37 (6):37-45.
[28]许礼刚,徐美娟,关景文. “众创空间”视域下区域创业环境对大学生创业行为的影响[J].实验技术与管理,2020,37 (4):32-38.
[29]吴菲菲,童奕铭,黄鲁成.组态视角下四螺旋创新驱动要素作用机制研究——基于中国30省高技术产业的模糊集定性比较分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41 (7):62-77.
[30]王成军,王肖肖,付祥云.基于CiteSpace的三重螺旋研究热点分析与趋势展望[J].演化与创新经济学评论,2018,12 (2):46-58.